Management Control and Uncertainty pp 255-268 | Cite as
Middle-Range Thinking and Management Control Systems
Abstract
For over 25 years, we have undertaken research that has used a research approach called Middle-Range Thinking (MRT) (cf. Laughlin, 1995, 2004; Broadbent & Laughlin, 2008) as a means of seeking to develop understanding of the role of accounting in change in the social world. In considering change in both society and organizations, we have concentrated on wide-ranging management controls, particularly those using accounting technologies, which have been implemented in the attempt to implement the required change. This chapter explores some elements of MRT both generally and specifically in the context of understanding control in conditions of uncertainty.
Keywords
Social World Steering Mechanism Management Control System Resource Flow Performance Management SystemPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Balls, E., Grice, J. O’Donnell, G. (2004). MicroeconomicReform in Britain Delivering Opportunities for AU. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
- Baitunek, J. M. (1984). Changing Interpretive Schemes and Organizational Restructuring: The Example of a Religious Order. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), 355–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Beny, A.J., Broadbent, J. & Otley, D. (1995). Management Control: Theories, Issues and Practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Broadbent, J. & Laughlin, R. (2008). Middle-Range Thinking. In R. Thorpe & R. Holt (Eds) The Sage Dictionary of Qualitative Management Research. London: Sage, 130–133.Google Scholar
- Broadbent, J. & Laughlin, R. (2009). Performance Management Systems: A Conceptual Model. Management Accounting Research, 20(4), 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Broadbent, J. & Laughlin, R. (2013). Accounting Control and Controlling Accounting: Interdisciplinary and Critical Perspectives. Bradford: Emerald.Google Scholar
- Broadbent, J., Gallop, C. & Laughlin, R. (2010). Analysing Societal Regulatory Control Systems with Specific Reference to Higher Education in England. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 23(4), 506–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Broadbent, J., Laughlin, R. & Read, S. (1991). Recent Financial and Administrative Changes in the NHS: A Critical Theory Analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 2(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Emmanuel, C, Otley, D. & Merchant, K. (1990). AccountingforManagement Control (Second edition). London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
- Feneira, A. & Otley, D. (2009). The Design and Use of Performance Management Systems: An Extended Framework for Analysis. Management Accounting Research, 20(4), 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hinings, C. R. & Greenwood, R. (1988). The Tracks and Dynamics of Strategic Change, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Laughlin, R. (1991). Environmental Disturbances and Organisational Transitions and Transformations: Some Alternative Models. Organization Studies, 12(2), 209–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Laughlin, R. (1995). Empirical Research in Accounting: Alternative Approaches and a Case for “Middle Range” Thinking. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8(1), 63–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Laughlin, R. (2004). Puttingthe Record Straight: A Commentary on “Methodological Choices and the Construction of Facts: Some Implications from the Sociology of Knowledge”. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 15(2), 261–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Laughlin, R., Broadbent, J., Sheam, D. & Willig-Atherton, H. (1994). Absorbing LMS: The Coping Mechanisms of a Small Group. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 7(1), 59–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Otley, D. & Berry, T. (1980). Control, Organization and Accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5(2), 231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schutz, A. (1967). The Phenomenology of the Social World, trans. G. Walsh and F. Lehnert. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar