Overloading Atlas: Samuel Bernard and the Crisis of French Banking

  • Guy Rowlands
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in the History of Finance book series (PSHF)

Abstract

In the immediate aftermath of the Huguetan affair Bernard was so overextended, thanks to the crisis and the deterioration of government revenue streams, that he came to fear his bills of exchange would be protested. He was operating in advance of payment by some 33 million livres in the summer of 1705, and his correspondents were demanding either more solid guarantees or payment up to three months in advance. This was a structural gap in war-effort-related remitting that would not shrink significantly for as long as funds needed to be sent abroad on a large scale. Bernard faced a dire situation. By the end of the year Venetian, Genoese and Milanese military officers were willing to provide one million livres to the French army of Lombardy, but were refusing to have anything to do with Bernard. In March 1706 Bernard was forced to give up his contract to supply money to French forces in Spain, and he explicitly grieved that he was being treated with far less confidence than in his previous five years of service. His lamentations that he was no longer getting the revenue instruments he wanted continued into 1707, when he exclaimed, ‘I would not have been able to imagine that after five years of service I would have attracted less confidence than that which Monseigneur [Chamillart] had in me from the start, and notably in 1702.’

Keywords

Revenue Source Full Face Fractional Reserve Banking French State Final Quarter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    AN G71120: Bernard to Chamillart, 29 June and 20 July 1705, 21 Mar. 1706, 12Mar. 1707 (quotation); Bernard to [Le Rebours?], 29 Jan. 1706; SHD A11878, no. 255: Esgrigny to Chamillart, 20 Nov. 1705; Jacques Saint-Germain (1960), Samuel Bernard, le banquier des rois (Paris), pp. 86–7.Google Scholar
  2. 5.
    Lüthy, I, pp. 188–91; André-E. Sayous (1938), ‘La Crise Financière de 1709 à Genève’, Bulletin de la société d’histoire et d’archéologie de Genève 6(4), 366–7; Jean-Pierre Mallet (1985), ‘Aux sources de la banque protestante: Les Mallet de Rouen à Paris, en passant par Genève 1557–1713’, in Michel Peronnet (ed.), Tricentenaire de la Révocation de l’Édit de Nantes. La révocation et l’extérieur du royaume 1685 (Montpellier), p. 357.Google Scholar
  3. 8.
    SHD A11613, no. 182: Montargis to Chamillart, 7 Mar. 1702; André-E. Sayous (1938), ‘La crise financière de 1709 à Lyon et à Genève’, Revue d’histoire économique et sociale 24, 60; AN G71776, no. 393: note, 27 Sep. 1704; Victor de Swarte (1893), Un banquier du Trésor Royal au XVIIIesiècle. Samuel Bernard. Sa vie — sa correspondance (1651–1739) (Paris/Nancy), pp. 25–6, 29; CCG, II, p. 192: Montézan to Chamillart, 9 June 1704.Google Scholar
  4. 14.
    AN G71120: Bernard to [Le Rebours?] [late July 1707] (quotation). On the Neuchâtel succession, see Wilhelm Oechsli (1922), History of Switzerland, 1499–1914 (Cambridge), pp. 229–31.Google Scholar
  5. 16.
    Lüthy I, pp. 192–3; AN G71780: no. 13: petition from Planchut [Aug. 1707]; G71119: Leonardo Fragoni to Chamillart, 10 July 1707; ‘Memoire des Srs. Sacerdotte’, 20 Aug. 1707; Pierre Crozat to Chamillart, 25 Sep. 1707; André-E. Sayous (1937), ‘Le financier Jean-Henri Huguetan à Amsterdam et à Genève’, Bulletin de la société d’histoire et d’archéologie de Genève 6(3), 269.Google Scholar
  6. 21.
    AN G71093: Méliand to Desmaretz, 14 July 1708; W. Gregory Monahan (1993), Year of Sorrows. The Great famine of 1709 in Lyon (Columbus, OH), p. 54; Esnault, II, p. 204: Bergeyck to Chamillart, 22 July 1708; AN G71121: ‘Compte des Fournitures faites en Flandres pour l’Exre. des Guerres 1708’ [Feb. 1709].Google Scholar
  7. 31.
    Paul Harsin (1973), ‘Le problème de l’escompte des lettres de change en France aux XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles’, International Review of the History of Banking 7, 195;Google Scholar
  8. Paul Harsin (1933), Crédit public et Banque d’État en France du XVIeau XVIIIesiècle (Paris), pp. 15, 26–36;Google Scholar
  9. Earl J. Hamilton (1969), ‘The Political Economy of France at the Time of John Law’, History of Political Economy 1, 141–3; AAE MD France 1137bis, fos 119r, 121v-2v: two memoranda from 10 July 1705, envisaging the complete incorporation of bankers on the model of notaries and agents de change.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 33.
    AN G71120: Bernard to Desmaretz, 7 July 1708; Nicolas to Desmaretz, 21 Aug. 1708; Harsin, Credit public, p. 41; Gary B. McCollim (2012), Louis XIV’s Assault on Privilege. Nicolas Desmaretz and the Tax on Wealth (Woodbridge), pp. 155–6.Google Scholar
  11. 39.
    Monahan, Year, p. 84; CCG, III, p. 98: Ravat to Desmaretz, 15 Feb. 1709; Lüthy I, p. 211; Germain Martin and Marcel Bezançon (1913), L’histoire du crédit en France sous le règne de Louis XIV (Paris), p. 184; SHD A12182, no.s 95 and 96: Desmaretz to Chamillart, 3 Mar. and 6 Mar. (quotation) 1709.Google Scholar
  12. 50.
    Guy Chaussinand-Nogaret, Les Financiers de Languedoc au XVIIIesiècle (Paris, 1970), pp. 50–1, 54–6; CCG, III, pp. 312, 337: Ravat to Desmaretz, 2 and 16 Sep. and 27 Dec. 1710; Sébastien Charléty (1902), ‘La ruine de Lyon sous Louis XIV, Revue de Paris (1 June 1902), 638–9, 647–8; Alfred Bonzon (1903), ‘La banque à Lyon aux XVIe, XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles’, Revue d’histoire de Lyon 2, 61.Google Scholar
  13. 56.
    Daniel Dessert (1984), Argent, pouvoir et société au Grand Siècle (Paris), p. 201; Dangeau, XVI, p. 500;Google Scholar
  14. Claude Badalo-Dulong (1951), Banquier du Roi. Barthélemy Hervart 1606–1676 (Paris), p. 158; Lüthy I, p. 286;Google Scholar
  15. Jacob M. Price (1973), France and the Chesapeake. A History of the French Fobacco Monopoly, 1674–1791, and Its Relationship to the British and American Fobacco Frades (Ann Arbor), I, p. 229; Saint-Germain, Bernard, p. 210.Google Scholar
  16. 57.
    Dangeau, XVI, pp. 212, 236; Saint-Germain, Bernard, pp. 235–6, 249; Mathieu Marais, Journal et mémoires de Mathieu Marais, avocat au Parlement de Paris, sur la régence et le règne de Louis XV (1715–1737), ed. by Adolphe de Lescure (Paris, 1863), I, p. 357; Dessert, Argent, pp. 129, 731; Anne Muratori-Philip (2000), Le roi Stanislas (Paris), p. 97.Google Scholar
  17. 58.
    In 1643 prices, to allow a comparison with Richelieu and Mazarin, these 33 million livres were some 17 million. Even il one allows the tact that Bernard had more of his assets in paper, this still puts him in the same league as Richelieu and the princely house of Bourbon-Condé. Calculation in Thierry Sarmant and Mathieu Stoll (2010), Régner et gouverner. Louis XLV et ses ministres (Paris), p. 495.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Guy Rowlands 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guy Rowlands
    • 1
  1. 1.University of St AndrewsUK

Personalised recommendations