The Age of Assassination: Monarchy and Nation in Nineteenth-Century Europe

  • Rachel G. Hoffman

Abstract

Over the course of the long nineteenth century, assassination emerged as a violent phenomenon across Europe. In contrast to the relative quiet of the eighteenth century, the nineteenth saw renewed the surge of political murder that had characterized the early modern period.1 In the late nineteenth century alone, assassins tried to kill nearly every major European ruler and head of state, including Emperor Franz Joseph of Austria, the Kaisers Wilhelm I, Friedrich III and Wilhelm II of Germany, the Tsars Alexander II, Alexander III and Nicholas II of Russia, the kings Victor Emmanuel II, Umberto I and Victor Emmanuel III of Italy, and various presidents of France, as well as numerous prominent politicians. During her long reign, Queen Victoria famously survived seven attempts on her life, while her husband, Prince Albert, and the future kings of England, Edward VII and George V, were targeted. It was not only the actual attacks that inspired fear among European royalty. The period was rife with rumours of assassination. The mere hint of conspiracy to commit political murder caused distress and anxiety at every European court. As monarchs, state ministers and police authorities grew concerned, so, too, did society at large. Assassination attempts provoked mass public demonstrations of loyalty to the state, with crowds gathering in their thousands to sing patriotic hymns, to illuminate and flag their streets, and to convene religious services and vigils.

Keywords

Security Measure Royal Family National Anthem Interior Minister Constitutional Monarchy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    See the short essay by Franklin L. Ford, ‘Assassination in the Eighteenth Century: The Dog That Did Not Bark in the Night’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 120: 3 (1976), 211–215.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    For a study of the phenomenon in nineteenth- and early-twentieth-century Germany see Rachel G. Hoffman, ‘Political Murder Plots in Germany, 1840s–1914’ (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge, 2013).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Few studies have addressed assassination as a phenomenon in itself; see, most notably, Franklin L. Ford, Political Murder: From Tyrannicide to Terrorism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
  4. One classic study of a particular assassination attack is Roland Mousnier, L’Assassinat d’Henri IV, 14 mai 1610 (Paris: Gallimard, 1964).Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    See Ernst H. Kantorowicz, The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957).Google Scholar
  6. See also, for example, Glenn Burgess, ‘The Divine Right of Kings Reconsidered,’ The English Historical Review, 107: 425 (1992), 837–861;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. W.H. Bruford, ‘The Organisation and Rise of Prussia’, in J.O. Lindsay (ed.), The New Cambridge Modern History Volume 7: The Old Regime, 1713–1763 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1957), 292–317,CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Julian H. Franklin, Jean Bodin and the Rise of Absolutist Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973);Google Scholar
  9. G.R. Elton, ‘The Divine Right of Kings’, in G.R. Elton (ed.), Studies in Tudor and Stuart Politics and Government, vol. II Parliament Political Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 193–214.Google Scholar
  10. 6.
    John Barrell, ‘Imagining the King’s Death: The Arrest of Richard Brothers,’ History Workshop 37: 1 (1994), 1–32;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. John Barrell, Imagining the King’s Death: Figurative Treason, Fantasies of Regicide, 1793–1796 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
  12. 7.
    See, for instance, Jean Rapp, Mémoires du general Rapp, aide-de-camp de Napoléon/Memoirs of General Count Rapp, first aide-de-camp to Napoleon (London: H. Colburn and Co., 1823), 141–146;Google Scholar
  13. Archibald Alison, History of Europe During the French Revolution, vol. V From the Commencement of the French Revolution in 1789, to the Restoration of the Bourbons in 1815 (10 vols., Edinburgh: William Blackwood and Sons, 1833–1842), 709–711;Google Scholar
  14. Napoleon Bonaparte to Joseph Fouché (Minister of Police of Paris), 12 October 1809, Schönbrunn, in J.M. Thompson (ed.), Letters of Napoleon (Oxford: Blackwell, 1934), 255–256.Google Scholar
  15. 8.
    For an useful overview see Hsi-Huey Liang, ‘International Cooperation of Political Police in Europe, 1815–1914: An Essay Based on some Austrian Archival Sources,’ Mitteilungen des Österreichischen Staatsarchivs, 33 (1980), 193–217.Google Scholar
  16. 9.
    See, for instance, Richard Bach Jensen, The Battle against Anarchist Terrorism: An International History, 1878–1934 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 10.
    Quoted in David I. Kertzer, Prisoner of the Vatican: The Popes’ Secret Plot to Capture Rome from the New Italian State (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 2004), 174; on La Civiltà Cattolica see 88–89.Google Scholar
  18. 12.
    See John Doyle Klier, Russians, Jews, and the pogroms of 1881–1882 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011);Google Scholar
  19. see also the contributions in John Doyle Klier and Shlomo Lambroza (eds.), Pogroms: Anti-Jewish Violence in Modern Russian History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
  20. 13.
    On the concept of ‘negative integration’ see Wolfgang Sauer, ‘Das Problem des deutschen Nationalstaates,’ Politische Vierteljahresschrift 3 (1962), 159–186;Google Scholar
  21. Guenther Roth, The Social Democrats in Imperial Germany: A Study in Working-Class Isolation and Negative Integration (Totowa, NJ: Bedminster Press, 1963);Google Scholar
  22. Dieter Groh, Negative Integration und revolutionärer Attentismus: Die deutsche Sozialdemokratie am Vorabend des ersten Weltkrieges (Frankfurt am Main: Propyläen, 1973);Google Scholar
  23. Hans-Ulrich Wehler, Das deutsche Kaiserreich, 1871–1918 (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 1973), 96–99,121.Google Scholar
  24. 14.
    See, for instance, Peter Domann, Sozialdemokratie und Kaisertum unter Wilhelm II. (Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1974);Google Scholar
  25. Nicholas Stargardt, The German Idea of Militarism: Radical and Socialist Critics, 1866–1914 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
  26. 16.
    George L. Mosse, ‘Caesarism, Circuses and Monuments’, Journal of Contemporary History 6: 2 (1971), 167–182;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Charles Rearick, ‘Festivals and Politics: The Michelet Centennial of 1898’, in Walter Laqueur and George L. Mosse (eds.), Historians in Politics (Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1974), 59–78;Google Scholar
  28. Charles Rearick, ‘Festivals in Modern France: The Experience of the Third Republic,’ Journal of Contemporary History, 12: 3 (1977), 435–460;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. David Cannadine, ‘The Context, Performance and Meaning of Ritual: The British Monarchy and the “Invention of Tradition”, c. 1820–1977’, in Eric J. Hobsbawm and Terence O. Ranger (eds.), The Invention of Tradition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983), 101–164;Google Scholar
  30. David E. Barclay, ‘Ritual, Ceremonial, and the “Invention” of a Monarchical Tradition in Nineteenth-Century Prussia’, in Heinz Duchhardt, Richard A. Jackson and David Sturdy (eds.), European Monarchy: Its Evolution and Practice from Roman Antiquity to Modern Times (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 1992), 207–220;Google Scholar
  31. Johannes Paulmann, Pomp und Politik: Monarchenbegegnungen in Europa zwischen Ancien Régime und Erstem Weltkrieg (Paderborn: F. Schöningh, 2000);Google Scholar
  32. John Plunkett, Queen Victoria: First Media Monarch (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003);Google Scholar
  33. Jan Rüger, The Great Naval Game: Britain and Germany in the Age of Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 93–139;Google Scholar
  34. see also the contributions in Andreas Biefang, Michael Epkenhans and Klaus Tenfelde (eds.), Das politische Zeremoniell im Deutschen Kaiserreich, 1871–1918 (Düsseldorf: Droste, 2008).Google Scholar
  35. 17.
    See, for example, H.W. von der Dunk, ‘The Dutch Monarchy in Europe’, in D.J. Elzinga (ed.), The Dutch Constitutional Monarchy in a Changing Europe (Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer, 2007), 81–95;Google Scholar
  36. Christiane Wolf, ‘Representing Constitutional Monarchy in Britain, Germany, and Austria’, in Laurence Cole and Daniel Unowsky (eds.), The Limits of Loyalty: Imperial Symbolism, Popular Allegiances, and State Patriotism in the Late Habsburg Monarchy (Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2007), 199–222.Google Scholar
  37. On the centrality of the public representation of rulers in a wider context see Clifford Geertz, ‘Centers, Kings, and Charisma: Reflections on the Symbolics of Power’, in Clifford Geertz (ed.), Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology (New York: Basic Books, 1983), 121–146.Google Scholar
  38. 18.
    With regard to the medieval period see Janet L. Nelson, Charles the Bald (London: Longman, 1992), 56, 70–71;Google Scholar
  39. John W. Bernhardt, Itinerant Kingship and Royal Monasteries in Early Medieval Germany, c. 936–1075 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), 49–50;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Simon MacLean, Kingship and Politics in the Late Ninth Century: Charles the Fat and the End of the Carolingian Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 21.
    Carolly Erickson, Her Little Majesty: The Life of Queen Victoria (London: Robson, 1997), 229.Google Scholar
  42. 22.
    See Paul Thomas Murphy, Shooting Victoria: Madness, Mayhem, and the Rebirth of the British Monarchy (London: Head of Zeus, 2012).Google Scholar
  43. 26.
    See also William Macdonald Sinclair, William and Frederick (German Emperors): Two Sermons preached at St. Paul’s Cathedral, St. Stephen’s, Westminster, and at St. Alban’s, Dedham (London: Hatchards, 1888).Google Scholar
  44. 28.
    A.G. Gardiner, The Life of Sir William Harcourt, vol. I1827–1886 (2 vols., London: Constable, 1923), 406.Google Scholar
  45. 29.
    Arthur von Brauer, Im Dienste Bismarcks: Persönliche Erinnerungen, edited by Helmuth Rogge (Berlin: Mittler, 1936), 134.Google Scholar
  46. 31.
    See Carola Dietze and Frithjof Benjamin Schenk, ‘Traditionelle Herrscher in moderner Gefahr. Soldatisch-aristokratische Tugendhaftigkeit und das Konzept der Sicherheit im spaten 19. Jahrhundert,’ Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 35: 3 (2009), 368–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 32.
    Jane Ridley, Bertie: A Life ofEdward VII (London: Chatto and Windus, 2012), 339–340.Google Scholar
  48. 35.
    Hildegard von Spitzemberg, Das Tagebuch: Aufzeichnungen aus der Hofgesellschaft des Hohenzollernreiches, edited by Rudolf Vierhaus (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 1961), 378.Google Scholar
  49. 39.
    Albert (Prince Consort of Victoria) to Ernst II (Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha), 12 June 1840, in Hector Bolitho (ed.), The Prince Consort and His Brother: Two Hundred New Letters (London: Cobden-Sanderson, 1933), 19–20;Google Scholar
  50. Charles Greville, diary entry for 12 June 1840, in Charles Greville, The Greville Memoirs: A Journal of the Reigns of King George IV, King William IV and Queen Victoria, vol. IV, edited by Henry Reeve (8 vols., London: Longmans, Green, 1888), 297–298;Google Scholar
  51. Elizabeth Longford (ed.), The Oxford Book of Royal Anecdotes (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989), 372.Google Scholar
  52. 40.
    Elizabeth Longford, Victoria R.I. (3rd edn, London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1998), 446.Google Scholar
  53. 44.
    On Germany, see, for example, Fritz Schellack, Nationalfeiertage in Deutschland von 1871 bis 1945 (Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang, 1990);Google Scholar
  54. Karin Friedrich, Festive Culture in Germany and Europe from the Sixteenth to the Twentieth Century (Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 2000);Google Scholar
  55. Ute Schneider, ‘Einheit ohne Einigkeit: Der Sedantag im Kaiserreich’, in Alexander Nützenadel (ed.), Inszenierungen des Nationalstaats: Politische Feiern in Italien und Deutschland seit 1860/71 (Cologne: SH-Verlag, 2000), 27–44;Google Scholar
  56. Jeffrey R. Smith, ‘The Monarchy versus the Nation: The “Festive Year” 1913 in Wilhelmine Germany,’ German Studies Review, 23: 2 (2000), 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 47.
    Carl E. Schorske, Fin-de-siècle Vienna: Politics and Culture (3rd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981), 24–115;Google Scholar
  58. James J. Sheehan, German History, 1770– 1866 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989), 531;Google Scholar
  59. Werner Telesko, Kulturraum Österreich: Die Identitilt der Regionen in der bildenden Kunst des 19. Jahrhunderts (Vienna: Böhlau, 2008), 77–102.Google Scholar
  60. See also Eugene S. Bagger, Francis Joseph: Emperor of Austria–King of Hungary (New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons, 1927), 215.Google Scholar
  61. 48.
    Michael S. Flier, ‘The Church of the Savior on the Blood: Projection, Rejection, Resurrection’, in Robert P. Hughes and Irina Paperno (eds.), Christianity and the Eastern Slavs, vol. II Russian Culture in Modern Times (3 vols., Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1994), 25–48;Google Scholar
  62. Michael S. Flier, ‘At Daggers Drawn: The Competition for the Church of the Savior on the Blood’, in Michael S. Flier and Robert P. Hughes (eds.), For SK: In Celebration of the Life and Career of Simon Karlinsky (Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Slavic Specialties, 1994), 97–115. See also Georgii Butikov, The Church of the Savior on the Blood (St-Petersburg, n.d.).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Rachel G. Hoffman 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rachel G. Hoffman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations