Advertisement

Giving in Mexico: Generosity, Distrust and Informality

Chapter

Abstract

Even before Spanish conquest in 1521, Mexico had a tradition of strong, centralized authority (Krauze, 1998). In the words of the nation’s Nobel Laureate, Octavio Paz, ‘Except during the interregnums of anarchy and civil war, we Mexicans have lived in the shadow of governments that have been despotic or paternalistic in turn, but have always been strong: the Aztec priest-king, the viceroy, the dictator, Mr. President’ (Paz, 1985, p. 381). Philanthropy and self-help have always existed, but often on the periphery of power and at the community level.

Keywords

Civil Society Mexico City Social Trust Civil Society Organization Religious Attendance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ablanedo, T.I. (2009). Las organizaciones de la sociedad civil en la legislatión mexkana [Civil Society Organizations in Mexican Legislation]. Retrieved July 20, 2013, from http://.icnl.org/research/library/files/Mexico/Ablanedo_Estudio_Final.pdf.Google Scholar
  2. Ablanedo, T.I., & Garcia, S. (2007). Promotion de una agenda fiscal para el desarrollo de las organizaciones de la sociedad civil: sistematización de la experiencia mexicana [The Promotion of a Fiscal Agenda for the Development of Civil Society Organizations: A Systematization of the Mexican Experience]. Retrieved July 20, 2013, from http://www.icnl.org/research/library/files/Mexico/FiscalAgenda.pdf.Google Scholar
  3. Ablanedo, TL, Garcia Olson, L., Garcia, S., & Layton, M.D. (2007). Defining a Fiscal Agenda for the Development of Civil Society Organizations in Mexico. Retrieved July 20, 2013, from http://www.icnl.org/research/library/files/Mexico/FiscalAgenda_eng.pdf.Google Scholar
  4. Arrom, S.M. (2005). Catholic Philanthropy and Civil Society: The Lay Volunteers of St. Vincent de Paul in 19th-century Mexico. In C. Sanborn & F. Portocarrero (Eds.), Philanthropy and Social Change in Latin America (pp. 31–62). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Association of Fundraising Professionals (AFP) (2012). Chapters. Retrieved July 20, 2013, from http://www.afpnet.org/audiences/chapters.cfm.Google Scholar
  6. Báez-Jorge, F. (1995). La Virgen de Guadalupe [The Virgin of Guadalupe]. In E. Florescano (Ed.), Mitos Mexicanos (pp. 179–188). Mexico City, Mexico: Nuevo Siglo-Aguilar.Google Scholar
  7. Barrett, F.J., Salerno, J.A., & Teunissen, O. (2008). A Summary of Mexico’s New ‘flat tax’ Regime. Retrieved July 14, 2013, from http://www.pwc.com/en_US/us/alternative-investment/assets/mc-ny-08–0420-pwc-alt-mex.pdf.Google Scholar
  8. Bekkers, R., & Wiepking, P. (2011). Accuracy of Self-reports on Donations to Charitable Organizations. Quality & Quantity, 45(6), pp. 1369–1383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bonfil Batalla, G. (1996). México Profunda: Reclaiming a Civilization (P.A. Dennis, Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  10. CAF (2013). Future World Giving: Unlocking the Potential of Global Philanthropy. Retrieved July 13, 2013, from https://www.cafonline.org/PDF/Future_World_Giving_Report_250212.pdf.Google Scholar
  11. Capgemini, & Merrill Lynch. (2007). World Wealth Report 2007. Retrieved September 27, 2012, from://.de.capgemini.com/m/de/tl/World_Wealth_Report_2007.pdf.Google Scholar
  12. Carlos Slim Hélu. (2007). Social Activity. Retrieved September 27, 2012, from http://www.carlosslim.com/responsabilidad_ing.html.Google Scholar
  13. Carrillo, C.P., Mayec Vargas Arias, S., Tapia, A.M., & Layton, M.D. (2009). Study of Corporate Philanthropy in Mexico. Mexico City, Mexico: Alternativas y Capacidades.Google Scholar
  14. Centro Mexicano para la Filantropía (n.d.). Indicadores de institucionalidad y transparencia. Retrieved July 21, 2013, from http://www.cemefi.org/proyectos/indicadores-de-institucionalidad-y-transparencia.html.Google Scholar
  15. Chamber of Deputies (2004). Ley federal de fomento a las actividades realizadas por las organizaciones de la sociedad civil [Federal Law to Encourage the Activities of Civil Society Organizations]. Retrieved September 27, 2012, from http://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/266.pdf.Google Scholar
  16. Chronicle of Philanthropy (2012). Search for Carlos Slim. Retrieved September 27, 2012, from http://philanthropy.com/search/?search_siteId=6&contextId=&action=rem&searchQueryString=carlos+slimGoogle Scholar
  17. Clinton Global Initiative (2012). President Clinton to Honor Six Recipients at the Sixth Annual Clinton Global Citizen Awards. Retrieved October 2, 2012, from http://press.clintonglobalinitiative.org/press_releases/president-clinton-to-honor-six-recipients-at-the-sixth-annual-clinton-global-citizen-awards/.Google Scholar
  18. Confío (n.d.) Construyendo Organizaciones Civiles Transparantes A.C. Retrieved July 21, 2013, from http://confio.org.mx/inicio/.
  19. Council for Advancement and Support of Education (CASE) (2011). CASE to Establish Ongoing Presence in Latin America. Retrieved October 4, 2012, from http://www.case.org/about_case/newsroom/press_release_archive/case_to_establish_ongoing_presence_in_latin_america.html.Google Scholar
  20. Estrella, J., Navarro Arredondo, A., & Ocejo, A. (2009). Estudio diagnóstico sobre los pro-gramas y acciones de fomento a las actividades de las organizaciones de la sociedad civil realizadas por la Administratión Publica Federal durante el período 2006 y 2007 [Diagnostic Study of Actions and Programs Undertaken by the Federal Administration Meant to Encourage Civil Society Organizations in 2006–2007]. Mexico City, Mexico: Comisión de Fomento de las Actividades de las Organizaciones de la Sociedad Civil (CIESAS).Google Scholar
  21. Filantrofilia (n.d.). Filantrofilia. Retrieved July 21, 2013, from http://www.filantrofilia.org/.
  22. Forbes (2012a). The World’s Billionaires: Carlos Slim Hélu & Family. Retrieved September 28, 2012, from http://www.forbes.com/profile/carlos-slim-helu/.Google Scholar
  23. Forbes (2012b). The World’s Billionaires: Alfredo Harp Hélu & Family. Retrieved September 28, 2012, from http://www.forbes.com/profile/alfredo-harp-helu/.Google Scholar
  24. Forbes (2012c). The World’s Billionaires: Jeronimo Arango & Family. Retrieved September 28, 2012, from http://www.forbes.com/profile/jeronimo-arango/.Google Scholar
  25. Forbes (2012d). The World’s Billionaires: Roberto Hernandez Ramirez. Retrieved September 28, 2012, from http://www.forbes.com/profile/roberto-hernandez-ramirez/.Google Scholar
  26. Forment, C. (2003). Democracy in Latin America, 1760–1900: Civic Selfhood and Public Life in Mexico and Peru, Volume 1. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Fox, J. (1994). The difficult transition from clientelism to citizenship: Lessons from Mexico. World Politics, 46(2), pp. 151–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guadarrama, G. (2007a). Tiempo, circunstancia y particularidades de la asistencia privada en el Estado de México [Time, Circumstance and the Peculiarities of Private Assistance in the State of Mexico]. State of Mexico, Mexico: El Colegio Mexiquense.Google Scholar
  29. Guadarrama, G. (2007b). Las Instituciones de asistencia privada en el Estado de México [Private Aid Institutions in the State of Mexico]. In Secretaría de Desarrollo Social [Ministry of Social Development] (Ed.), La sociedad y su participación en la asistencia privada (pp. 17–49). State of Mexico, Mexico: Editorial Council for the State’s Public Administration.Google Scholar
  30. Inglehart, R., Basañez, M., Catterberg, G., Díez-Medrano, J., Moreno, A., Norris, P., Siemienska, R., & Zuasnabar, I. (2010). Changing Human Beliefs and Values, 1981–2007: A Cross-cultural Sourcebook Based on the World Values Surveys and European Values Studies. Mexico City, Mexico: Siglo XXI Editores, S.A.Google Scholar
  31. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía (INEGI) (2010). Censos de Población y Vivienda, 1950 a 2010. Características culturales de la población — Volumen y porcentaje de la población según profese alguna religión y tipo de religión, 1950 a 2010 [Population Census 1950–2010: Cultural Characteristics — Volume and Percentage of Population that Professed Religion and Which Type They Declared]. Retrieved September 27, 2012, from http://.inegi.org.mx/sistenias/sisept/default.aspx?t=nirel01&s=est&c=27645.Google Scholar
  32. Krauze, E. (1998). Biography of Power. New York: Perennial.Google Scholar
  33. Layton, M.D. (2007). Flat taxes, Santa Claus, and charity: The need to strengthen civil society in Mexico. The International Journal of Not-for-Proflt Law, 9(4), pp. 84–87.Google Scholar
  34. Layton, M.D. (2008). Las dos paradojas de la generation del capital social en México [The Two Paradoxes in the Creation of Social Capital in Mexico]. In Transparencia, confianza ciudadana e Instituciones: Memoria Seminario Internacional 2007 (pp. 231–238). Mexico City, Mexico: Instituto de Acceso a la Information Publica del Distrito Federal (IFAI-DF).Google Scholar
  35. Layton, M.D. (2009). A paradoxical generosity: Resolving the puzzle of community philanthropy in Mexico, Giving — Thematic Issues on Philanthropy and Social Innovation. Issue on Community Philanthropy, 9(1), pp. 87–102.Google Scholar
  36. Layton, M.D. (2013). Website Aims to Offer Trustworthy Data on Mexico’s Civil Sector. Hispanics in Philanthropy: HIP Blog. Retrieved July 27, 2013, from http://www.hiponline.org/resources/hip-blog/blog/417-website-aims-to-offer-trustworthy-data-on-mexicos-civil-sector.Google Scholar
  37. Layton, M.D., Garcia, S., & Rosas, A.P. (2012). Análisis de la information disponible en el Portal de Transparencia de las donatarias autorizadas del Servicio de Administration Tributaria (SAD para el ejercicio fiscal 2007 [Analysis of the Information Available in the Transparency Portal of the Tax Administration Service for Fiscal Year 2007]. In M.D. Layton (Ed.), Pinanciamiento de las organizaciones de la sociedad civil en México: Donativos Privados 2007 (pp. 109–130). Ciudad Juárez, Mexico: Universidad Autónoma de Ciudad Juárez.Google Scholar
  38. Layton, M.D., & Moreno, A. (2010). Filantropía y sociedad civil en Mexico. Análisis de la ENAPI 2005–2008 [Philanthropy and Civil Society in Mexico: An Analysis of the ENAFI 2005–2008]. Mexico City, Mexico: Miguel Angel Porrua.Google Scholar
  39. Layton, M.D., Sánchez, M., & Terán, M. (2011). Resultados del análisis de la information disponible en el portal de transparencia de las donatarias autorizadas: comparativo entre los ejercicios fiscales 2007 y 2008 [Results from the Analysis of Available Information from the Authorized Donees Transparency Website: A Comparison Between the 2007 and 2008 Fiscal Years] (Unpublished Memo). Mexico City, Mexico: Philanthropy and Civil Society Project — ITAM.Google Scholar
  40. Loteria National (n.d.). Loteria. Retrieved July 14, 2014, from http://www.lotenal.gob.mx/.Google Scholar
  41. Monsiváis, C. (2005). No sin nosotros: Los días del terremoto 1985–2005 [Not Without us: The Days of the Earthquake 1985–2005]. Mexico City, Mexico: Ediciones Era.Google Scholar
  42. Moreno, A. (2005). Nuestros valores: los mexicanos en México y en Estados Unidos al inicio del siglo XXI [Our Values: Mexicans in Mexico and the United States at the Beginning of the 21st Century]. Mexico City, Mexico: Banamex.Google Scholar
  43. Murua, S.L., & Meza, Y (2001). Asistencia privada: caridad o derecho [Private Assistance: Charity or Right]. Mexico City, Mexico: Ediciones Quinto Sol.Google Scholar
  44. OECD (2012a). Public Social Expenditures in OECD Countries. Retrieved September 25, 2012, from http://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?datasetcode=SOCX_AGGGoogle Scholar
  45. OECD (2012b). México: Mejores políticas para un desarrollo incluyente [Mexico: Better Policies for Comprehensive Growth]. Retrieved September 27, 2012, from http://.oecd.org/centrodemexico/Mexico%202012%20FINALES%20SEP%20eBook.pdf.Google Scholar
  46. Olvera, A. (2010). The elusive democracy: Political parties, democratic institutions, and civil society in Mexico. Latin American Research Review, 45, pp. 78–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Paz, O. (1985). The Philanthropic Ogre. In The Labyrinth of Solitude and Other Writings (pp. 377–398). New York: Grove Weidenfeld.Google Scholar
  48. Rueschemeyer, D., Huber Stephens, E., & Stephens, J.D. (1992). Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  49. Salamon, L.M., & Sokolowski, S.W. (2004). Global Civil Society: Dimensions of the Nonprofit Sector, 2. Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  50. Salamon, L.M., Sokolowski, S.W., & Anheier, H.K. (2000). Social origins of civil society: An overview. Working Papers of the Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project, No. 38. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Center for Civil Society Studies.Google Scholar
  51. Sanborn, C, & Portacarrero, F. (2005). Philanthropy and Social Change in Latin America. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University, David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies.Google Scholar
  52. Servicio de Administratión Tributaria (2012). Donatarias Autorizadas: Requisitos, ventajas y obligaciones fiscales. Mexico City, Mexico: Servicio de Administratión Tributaria (SAT).Google Scholar
  53. Tapia, A.M., & Robles, A.G. (2006). Retos Institucionales del Marco Legal y Financiamiento a las Organizaciones de la Sociedad Civil [Institutional Challenges to the Legal Framework and Financing of Civil Society Organizations]. Mexico City, Mexico: Alternativas y Capacidades A.C.Google Scholar
  54. Tapia, A.M., & Robles A.G. (2007). Accountability in the Allocation and Use of Public Resources by Civil Society Organizations. In J. Fox, L. Haight, H. Hofbauer, & T. Sánchez Andrade (Eds.), Mexico’s Right-to-Know Laws: Civil Society Perspectives (pp. 238–246). Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.Google Scholar
  55. Teletón (2012). Teletón México y Teletón USA. Retrieved October 4, 2012, from http://www.teleton.org.mx/teleton/sala-de-prensa/noticias/pdf/74/.Google Scholar
  56. The World Bank (2012). World Development Report 2013: fobs. Retrieved October 2, 2012, from http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTNWDR2013/Resources/8258024–1320950747192/8260293–1322665883147/WDR_2013_Report.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. United States International Grantmaking (USIG) (2012). Country Information: Mexico, Updated August 2012. Retrieved September 24, 2012, from http://usig.org/countryinfo/mexico.asp#Knowledge.Google Scholar
  58. Valero, A. (2010). La caridad y la filantropía en la Nueva España [Charity and Philanthropy in the Viceroyalty of New Spain]. In J. Villalobos (Ed.), Filantropía y Acción Solidaria en la Historia de México (pp. 29–57). Mexico City, Mexico: Centro Mexicano para la Filantropía.Google Scholar
  59. Vargas Llosa, M. (1992). La dictadura perfecta [The Perfect Dictatorship]. Retrieved July 10, 2014 from http://elpais.com/diario/1992/06/01/opinion/707349616_850215.html.Google Scholar
  60. Verduzco, G. (2003). Organizaciones no lucrativas: visión de su trayectoria en México [Nonprofit Organizations: A Vision of Their Trajectory in Mexico]. Mexico City, Mexico: El Colegio de México and Centro Mexicano para la Filantropía.Google Scholar
  61. Verduzco, G., List, R., & Salamon, L. (1999). Mexico. In L. Salamon, H. Anheier, R. List, S. Toepler, & S.W. Sokolowski (Eds.), Global Civil Society: Dimensions of the Nonprofit Sector (pp. 429–443). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins Centre for Civil Society.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Michael D. Layton and Valérie Mossel 2015

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations