Skip to main content

The Challenge of Implementing Strategic Management Reforms in the US Department of Transportation

  • Chapter
  • 244 Accesses

Part of the book series: IIAS Series: Governance and Public Management ((GPM))

Abstract

Twenty years ago, Congress enacted the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA). This legislation was intended to reform the strategic management practices of federal government agencies by requiring agency leaders to develop a strategic plan with outcome-oriented goals, identify performance measures and targets for each of the goals, and annually report their progress in achieving these goals. Following the implementation of GPRA, the Bush administration introduced additional strategic management reforms that applied to all large agencies, which are also referred to as Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Act agencies within the federal government. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) initiated these reforms to address perceived shortcomings in agency management practices following the passage of GPRA. Most importantly, studies of agency implementation practices suggested that managers were not consistently using the performance information that was being routinely reported to Congress to effectively manage their programmes and available resources. In 2011, Congress enacted the first significant update to GPRA by passing the GPRA Modernization Act (G PR AM A). Among other things, the legislation codified management practices introduced in the Bush administration, set the cycle of agency strategic planning to coincide with a new presidential term and required agencies to consult more frequently with Congress and others with an interest or stake in the achievement of the goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • S. Borins (2010) ‘Strategic Planning from Robert McNamara to Gov 2.0’, Public Administration Review. December, S220-S221.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Brown (2010) ‘The Evolution of Public Sector Strategy’, Public Administration Review, December, S212-S214.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Dubnick and H.G. Fredenckson (2011) Public Accountability: Performance Measurement, the Extended State, and the Search for Trust (Washington, DC: National Academy of Public Administration and the Kettering Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • General Accountability Office (GAO) (2005) Performance Budgeting: Efforts to Restructure Budgets to Better Align Resources with Performance, GAO-05-117SP (Washington, DC: General Accountability Office), February, http://www.gao.gov/assets/210/202585.pdf, date accessed 4 April 2014.

  • General Accountability Office (GAO) (2013) Managing for Results: Executive Branch Should More Fully Implement the GPRA Modernization Act to Address Pressing Governance Challenges. E-Supplement to GAO-13-S78. 117SP (Washington, DC: General Accountability Office), June, http://www.gao.gov/special.pubs/gao-13-519sp/dot/results.htm#question_22, date accessed 4 April 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Joyce (2013) ‘Strategic Management and Change in the Public Services’. In S.P. Osborne and L. Brown (eds), Handbook of Innovation in Public Services (Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing), 210–223.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • R.S. Kaplan and D.P. Norton (2006) Alignment (Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercatus Center (2009) Measuring GPRA’s Results, Table 2. Scorecard Summary and Ranking, FY 2008. (Fairfax, VA: George Mason University) http://mercatus.org/sites/default /files/Executive%20Summary%20and%20Rankings_fy08.pdf, date accessed 4 April 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • S.H. Metzenbaum (2009) Performance Management Recommendations for the New Administration (Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government), http://www.businessofgovernment.org/report/performance-management-recommendations-new-administration, date accessed 4 April 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • D.P. Moynihan (2008) The Dynamics of Performance Management — Constructing Information and Reform (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • OMB (2009) ExpectMore.gov: DOT Programs (Washington, DC: Office of Management and Budget), http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/omb/expectmore/agency/021.html,date accessed 4 April 2014.

  • OMB (2010) Analytical Perspectives on the FY 2011 Budget (Washington, DC: Office of Management and Budget), http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/budget/fy2011/as sets/management.pdf, date accessed 4 April 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • OMB (2011) Delivering on the Accountable Government Initiative and Implementing the GPRA Modernization Act of 2011 (Washington, DC: Office of Management and Budget), 14 April, http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2011/m 11–17.pdf, date accessed 4 April 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • OMB (2012a) Analytical Perspectives on the FY 2013 Budget (Washington, DC: Office of Management and Budget), http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/ files/omb/budget/fy2013/assets/management.pdf, date accessed 4 April 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • OMB (2012b) Circular No. A-ll, Preparation, Submission, and Execution of the Budget (Washington, DC: Office of Management and Budget), http://www.white-house.go v/sites/default/files/omb/assets/al l_cunent_year/a_l l_2012.pdf, date accessed 4 April 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • OMB (2013) FY 2015 Budget Guidance (Washington, DC: Office of Management and Budget), 29 May http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2013/m-13-14.pdf, date accessed 4 April 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partnership for Public Service (2013) Taking Measure: Moving From Process to Practice in Performance Management (Washington, DC: Grant Thornton LLP), http://ourpublicservice.org/OPS/publications/viewcontentdetails.php?id=232, date accessed 4 April 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Radin (2006) Challenging the Performance Movement (Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • P.S. Ring and J.L. Perry (1985) ‘Strategic Management in Public and Private Organizations: Implications of Distinctive Contexts and Constraints’, Academy of Management Review, 10, 2, 276–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.W. Stanley (2012) ‘Applying Performance-Based Management Practices in the U.S. Federal Highway Administration: A Practitioner’s Perspective’, International Review of Public Administration, 17, 3, 117–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Transportation (2010) FY 2012–2016 DOT Strategic Plan (Washington, DC: US DOT), http://www.dot.gov/sites/dot.dev/files/docs/990_355_DOT_StrategicPlan_5081owres.pdf, date accessed 4 April 2014.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 J. Woody Stanley

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stanley, J.W. (2014). The Challenge of Implementing Strategic Management Reforms in the US Department of Transportation. In: Joyce, P., Bryson, J.M., Holzer, M. (eds) Developments in Strategic and Public Management. IIAS Series: Governance and Public Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137336972_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics