The Tempest as Theatrical Magic

  • Andrew Gurr
Part of the Palgrave Shakespeare Studies book series (PASHST)

Abstract

We all suffer from delusions of control, even over storms and shipwrecks. We use that delusion whenever we edit or criticise Shakespeare, and as editor for the last 29 years of the New Variorum (NV) edition of our play, I share it more thoroughly than most. New Variorum editing is the ultimate postmodern activity, since it deals not with the play itself but with all subsequent editions and criticisms about it. Over the years as a NV editor I have read and collated over seventy editions and thousands of critiques about The Tempest. But whether we edit or criticise, on page or on stage, the play becomes a less rich phenomenon than it should be, even when viewed, bare as it is, on the pages of the First Folio. What I am offering here is an example of my own paranoid delusion of control, by means of a rapid overview, with just a few items from the available horde of possible examples, offering just one aspect of the multiple criticisms of the play through the last two and a bit centuries, the play as theatrical magic.

Keywords

Paranoid Delusion Magical Thinking Subsequent Edition Supernatural Agency Late Play 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works cited

  1. Bate, Jonathan (1989) Shakespearean Constitutions: Politics, Theatre, Criticism 1730–1830, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brower, Reuben A. (1951) Fields of Light, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bullough, Geoffrey (1975) Narrative and Dramatic Sources of Shakespeare, VIII, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, Thomas (1838) The Dramatic Works of William Shakespeare, I, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Dowden, Edward (1962) A Critical Study of his Mind and Art (3rd edn 1877), London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Dowden, Edward (1968) “The Serenity of The Tempest”, in David J. Palmer (ed.), Shakespeare, The Tempest: A Casebook, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Greenblatt, Stephen (2004) Will in the World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare, London: Norton.Google Scholar
  8. Greer, Germaine (1986) Shakespeare: Past Masters, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hamilton, Donna B. (1990) Virgil and The Tempest, Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hawkins, Harriett (1960) “Fabulous Counterfeits: Dramatic Construction and Dramatic Perspectives in The Spanish Tragedy, A Midsummer Night’s Dream, and The Tempest”, Shakespeare Studies 6: 51–65.Google Scholar
  11. Hill, Geoffrey (2008) “The Lords of Limit”, in Kenneth Hayes (ed.), Collected Critical Writings, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 58–70.Google Scholar
  12. Jordan, Constance (1997) Shakespeare’s Monarchies. Ruler and Subject in the Romances, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Kernan, Alvin B. (1979) The Playwright as Magician: Shakespeare’s Image of the Poet in the English Public Theater, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kipling, Rudyard (1916) “How Shakespeare Came to Write The ‘Tempest”, Introduction by Ashley Thorndike, Printed for the Dramatic Museum of Columbia University (originally published as a letter in The Spectator 2 July 1898).Google Scholar
  15. Lytton Strachey, Giles (1924) “Shakespeare’s Final Period”, in Books and Characters, London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
  16. McDonald, Russ (2006) Shakespeare’s Late Style, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McMullan, Gordon (2007) Shakespeare and the Idea of Late Writing: Authorship in the Proximity of Death, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mowat, Barbara (1976) The Dramaturgy of Shakespeare’s Romances, Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  19. Mowat, Barbara (1981) “Prospero, Agrippa, and Hocus-Pocus”, English Literary Renaissance 11(3): 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Muir, Kenneth (1961) Last Periods of Shakespeare, Racine, and Ibsen, Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Nelson, Robert (1958) Play within a Play: The Dramatist’s Conception of His Art. Shakespeare to Anouilh, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Nevo, Ruth (1987) Shakespeare’s Other Language, London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  23. Orgel, Stephen (1998) “Marginal Jonson”, in David Bevington and Peter Holbrook (eds), The Politics of the Stuart Court Masque, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 144–75.Google Scholar
  24. Stoll, Edgar Elmer (1932) “The Tempest”, PMLA 47, 699–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Woodbridge, Linda (1994) The Scythe of Saturn, Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Andrew Gurr 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Gurr

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations