The Aftermath of Suffrage pp 159-180 | Cite as
‘We Were Done the Moment We Gave Women the Vote’: The Female Franchise Factor and the Munich By-elections, 1938–1939
Abstract
From the immediate post-war and post-enfranchisement years to the outbreak of the Second World War two issues preoccupied press, politicians and public. The first was how the universal franchise — particularly the women’s vote — would redraw the political landscape and alter the nature of politics. Already in 1918 Lord Esher set a fretful tone by foreseeing that ‘an avalanche of women has been hurled into the political chaos. Institutions as well as ideas will have to be re-sorted’.1 The second area of deep uncertainty was the reconstruction of the international order after the rupture and annihilation of the Great War. The mass electorate’s imagination was captured by the recasting of international relations, the expectancy placed on the League of Nations, the menace of extremist alternatives at home and abroad, and myriad campaigns promising the path to world peace.2 The scholarship on each of these themes is vast and varied but, ultimately, quite discrete, tending not to recognise how intimately the two issues were, in fact, overlapping and intrinsic. Indeed, one of the main objections to women’s enfranchisement was on the grounds that as a sex they were not suited to decide foreign and imperial affairs. This attitude persisted even after the war, and was well illustrated, for instance, by the state’s reluctance to remove the bar to women joining the diplomatic service.
Keywords
Public Opinion Foreign Policy Foreign Affair Recent Crisis Woman CandidatePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
- 1.Lord Esher, After the War (1918).Google Scholar
- 2.See Helen McCarthy, ‘Parties, Voluntary Associations, and Democratic Politics in Interwar Britain’, Historical Journal, 50,4 (2007), pp. 891–912, and Helen McCarthy, The British People and the League of Nations: Democracy, Citizenship and Internationalism, c. 1918–1945 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
- 3.‘Electoral Reform: Peers and Franchises for Women’, Manchester Guardian, 10 Jan. 1918. Lord Loreburn’s amendment to delete the women’s suffrage clause from the Reform Bill was defeated by an unexpectedly large majority of 134 to 71.Google Scholar
- 4.Julie V. Gottlieb, ‘Guilty Women?’, BBC History Magazine, 12:13 (December, 2011), pp. 26–9.Google Scholar
- 5.Susan Kingsley Kent, Making Peace: The Reconstruction of Gender in Inter-war Britain (Princeton, 1993), p. 99.Google Scholar
- 6.Oct. 1938, ed. Nigel Nicolson, Harold Nicolson: Diaries and Letters 1930–1939 (London, 1966), p. 376.Google Scholar
- 7.Daniel Hucker, Public Opinion and the End of Appeasement in Britain and France (Farnham: Ashgate, 2011) is a step towards closing this gap in the historiography.Google Scholar
- 8.See eds Chris Cook and John Ramsden, By-Elections in British Politics (London: UCL Press, 1997), p. 5.Google Scholar
- 10.Krista Cowman, Women in British Politics, c. 1689–1979 (Basingstoke, 2010), p. 170.Google Scholar
- 11.Roger Eatwell, ‘Munich, Public Opinion, and Popular Front’, Journal ofContemporary History, Vol. 6, No. 4 (1971), pp. 122–39.Google Scholar
- 12.Iain McLean, ‘Oxford and Bridgwater’, in Chris Cook and John Ramsden (eds), By-elections in British Politics (London: UCL Press, 1997), pp. 130–50.Google Scholar
- 13.M. Pugh, ‘The Impact of Women’s Enfranchisement in Britain’, in C. Daley and M. Nolan (eds), Suffrage and Beyond (New York, 1994), p. 318. Women also were more successful winning their seats at by-elections.Google Scholar
- 14.Martin Ceadel, ‘The First British Referendum: The Peace Ballot, 1934–5’, English Historical Review, Vol. 95, No. 377 (Oct. 1980), pp. 810–39.Google Scholar
- 15.Norman Rose, ‘The Resignation of Anthony Eden’, Historical Journal, 25, 4 (1982), pp. 911–31.Google Scholar
- 18.See Penny Summerfield, “Our Amazonian Colleague”: Edith Summerskill’s Problematic Reputation’, in R. Toye and J. Gottlieb (eds), Making Reputations: Power, Persuasion and the Individual in Modern British Politics (London: I.B. Tauris, 2005), pp.135–50.Google Scholar
- 20.Julie Gottlieb, ‘Varieties of Feminist Anti-Fascism’, in Nigel Copsey and Andrzej Olechnowicz (eds), Varieties of Anti-Fascism: Britain in the Inter-war Period (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 101–18.Google Scholar
- 25.Martin Pugh, Women and the Women’s Movement in Britain (Basingstoke, 2000).Google Scholar
- 31.Roger Eatwell, ‘Munich, Public Opinion, and Popular Front’, Journal ofContemporary History, Vol. 6, No. 4 (1971), pp. 122–39.Google Scholar
- 35.Noakes notes that Harrisson constructed women ‘as a separate and problematic group’. Lucy Noakes, War and the British: Gender, Memory and National Identity (London, 1998), p. 87.Google Scholar
- 38.Iain McLean, ‘Oxford and Bridgwater’, in Chris Cook and John Ramsden (eds), By-elections in British Politics (London: UCL Press, 1997), pp. 130–50.Google Scholar
- 45.‘The By-Elections: Mr Bartlett Making Headway at Bridgwater’, Manchester Guardian, 11 Nov. 1938.Google Scholar
- 50.Stuart Ball, ‘The Politics of Appeasement: the Fall of the Duchess of Atholl and the Kinross and West Perth By-election, December 1938’, Scottish Historical Review, Vol. LXIX, No. 187 (Apr. 1990), pp. 49–83.Google Scholar
- 53.Stuart Ball, ‘The Politics of Appeasement: the Fall of the Duchess of Atholl and the Kinross and West Perth By-election, December 1938’, Scottish Historical Review, Vol. LXIX, No. 187 (Apr. 1990), pp. 49–83.Google Scholar
- 54.Ibid.Google Scholar
- 55.Ibid.Google Scholar
- 64.Laura Drummond Beers, ‘Whose Opinion?: Changing Attitudes Towards Opinion Polling in British politics, 1937–1964’, Twentieth Century British History, vol. 17, no. 2, 2006, pp. 177–205. Eleanor Rathbone made reference to polls during her incursions into foreign policy debates in the House. New Chronicle headline ‘Widespread demand for National Register in Public Opinion Survey: 57 per cent for Chamberlain: 43 per cent Against: More Women than Men are in his Favour’,. News Chronicle, 19 Oct. 1938.Google Scholar
- 65.The Marchioness of Londonderry, Retrospect (London, 1938), p. 145.Google Scholar