Critical Pedagogy and Global Literature pp 213-219 | Cite as
“The Speculation of Schoolboys”: Confronting the Academy in Ulysses
Abstract
We face an inherent paradox as instructors of world literature. Although we present our students with texts that often challenge the norms of formal academic discourse, we simultaneously ask our students to respond to these texts in written assignments that enforce the very same norms. Requiring students to embrace these norms in their own writing often undermines the authors under consideration; enforcement of the formal academic standard foregrounds the underlying Western value system—clarity, directness, linearity, and so onthat many authors in the world literature cannon resist. Moreover, the formal standard mitigates the revolutionary potential of the ideas presented in world literature by reinforcing the type of intellectual training that, Lynn Bloom argues, “promulgates the middle-class values that are thought to be essential to the proper functioning of students in the academy” (656).1 Within our curriculum, then, we must locate opportunities where students can enact—not merely observe—techniques and writing strategies that complicate the implicit values of formal academic discourse; we must locate opportunities where students can demonstrate their understanding of a text not by merely recycling a prescribed form, but by authoritatively establishing their own voice.
Keywords
English Literature World Literature Prescribe Form Transcendental Ideal Write AssignmentPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Works Cited
- Bloom, Lynn Z. “Freshman Composition as a Middle-Class Enterprise,” College English 58, no. 6 (October, 1996): 654–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cheng, Vincent. “Empire and Patriarchy in ‘The Dead.’” Joyce, Race, and Empire. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995. 128–47.Google Scholar
- Ellmann, Richard. James Joyce, rev. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
- Gifford, Don, and Robert J. Seidman. Ulysses Annotated: Notes For James Joyce’s Ulysses. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989.Google Scholar
- Johnson, T. R. “School Sucks.” College Composition and Communication 52, no. 4 (June, 2001).Google Scholar
- Joyce, James. A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
- —. Ulysses. New York: Vintage International, 1990.Google Scholar
- Mullin, Katherine. James Joyce, Sexuality and Social Purity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
- Orr, Leonard, ed. Joyce, Imperialism, & Postcolonialism. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2008.Google Scholar