Advertisement

Employer Anti-Unionism in Democratic Indonesia

  • Michele Ford

Abstract

In post-authoritarian Indonesia, the exclusionary corporatism of Suharto’s New Order (1967–1998) has given way to a complex and ideologically diverse labour movement, free to engage in workplace organising and to attempt to exert influence on the national industrial relations landscape. This remarkable transformation was brought about by dramatic legislative shifts in the early post-Suharto period that heralded the arrival of far more inclusionary policies towards organised labour. Backed by the international labour movement and much optimism, dozens of union federations and several national centres emerged within a matter of years, all seeking to stake their claim on behalf of workers. Their capacity to do so was bolstered by dramatic changes to the industrial relations system, which shifted the emphasis from stateled tripartism to a combination of regional tripartite mechanisms and firm-level bipartism, in the process dramatically increasing the space available for collective bargaining, but also for legislative and public relations campaigns. Initially, employers were taken by surprise by the resurgence of organised labour in both the workplace and the policy arena. During the Suharto years, the developmentalist state had formed a strong alliance with capital in its efforts to achieve rapid economic growth, guaranteeing political and industrial stability in return for unquestioning loyalty and financial support.

Keywords

Minimum Wage Trade Union Collective Bargaining Comparative International Development Industrial Relation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ACILS (2010) Core Labor Rights in Indonesia 2010: A Survey of Violations in the Formal Sector, American Center for International Labor Solidarity, Jakarta.Google Scholar
  2. Akatiga, TURC and Lab Sosio UI (2006) Promoting Fair Labour Regulations in Indonesia: A Study and Advocacy in Improving Local Level Investment Environment in Tangerang and Pasuruan (sic), Akatiga, Bandung.Google Scholar
  3. Caraway, T. (2004) ‘Protective repression, international pressure, and institutional design: Explaining labor reform in Indonesia’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 39/3: 28–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caraway, T. (2008) ‘Explaining the dominance of legacy unions in new democracies: Comparative insights from Indonesia’, Comparative Political Studies, 41/10: 1371–1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caraway, T. (2009) ‘Labor rights in Asia: Progress or regress?’ Journal of East Asian Studies, 9/2: 153–186.Google Scholar
  6. Caraway, T. (2010) ‘Labour standards and labour market flexibility in East Asia’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 45/2: 225–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cribb, R. (ed.) (1990) The Indonesian Killings of 1965–66: Studies from Java and Bali, Centre of Southeast Asian Studies, Monash University, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  8. Departemen Tenaga Kerja dan Transmigrasi (2005) ‘Daftar serikat pekerja/seri-kat buruh nasional yang memenuhi syarat keterwakilan dalam kelembagaan hubungan industrial sesuai pasal 5 Kepmenakerj no. Kep. 201/men/2001 berdasarkan data jumlah propinsi dan jumlah anggota SP/SB’, unpublished document.Google Scholar
  9. Ford, M. (1999) ‘Testing the limits of corporatism: Reflections on industrial relations institutions and practice in Suharto’s Indonesia’, Journal of Industrial Relations, 41/3: 371–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ford, M. (2000) ‘Continuity and change in Indonesian labour relations in the Habibie interregnum’, Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 28/2: 59–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ford, M. (2004) ‘A challenge for business? Developments in Indonesian trade unionism after Soeharto’ in Basri, M. and van der Eng, P. (eds) Business in Indonesia: New Challenges, Old Problems, ISEAS, Singapore, 221–233.Google Scholar
  12. Ford, M. (2008) ‘Indonesia: Separate organizing within unions’ in Broadbent, K. and Ford, M. (eds) Women and Labour Organizing in Asia: Diversity, Autonomy and Activism, Routledge, London, 15–33.Google Scholar
  13. Ford, M. (2009) Workers and Intellectuals: NGOs, Trade Unions and the Indonesian Labour Movement, NUS/Hawaii/KITLV, Singapore.Google Scholar
  14. Ford, M. (2010) ‘A victor’s history: A comparative analysis of the labour historiography of Indonesia’s New Order’, Labor History, 51/4: 523–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hadiz, V. (1997) Workers and the State in New Order Indonesia, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  16. Juliawan, B. (2010) ‘Extracting labor from its owner: Private employment agencies and labor market flexibility in Indonesia’, Critical Asian Studies, 42/1: 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. KASBI (2012a) ‘Dukungan perjuangan buruh PT SC Enterprises’. Available at http://finance.dir.groups.yahoo.com/group/jaringan_L2P/message/3364 (accessed 22 June 2012).Google Scholar
  18. KASBI (2012b) ‘Pernyataan sikapatas serangandan penganiayaanoleh sekelompok orang tidak dikenal (preman) terhadap Para Buruh PT. intan pertiwi industri yang sedang mogok kerja’. Available at http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/jaringan_L2P/message/3377 (accessed 22 June 2012).Google Scholar
  19. Kammen, D. (1997) ‘A time to strike: Industrial strikes and changing class relations in New Order Indonesia’, PhD thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca.Google Scholar
  20. Kammen, D. and McGregor, K. (2012) (eds) The Contours of Mass Violence in Indonesia: 1965–1998, NUS Press/KITLV/Hawai’i University Press, Singapore.Google Scholar
  21. LIPS (1999) Untitled Report on LIPS’ Worker-NGO Workshop, LIPS, Bogor.Google Scholar
  22. MacIntyre, A. (1994) ‘Power, prosperity and patrimonialism: Business and government in Indonesia’ in MacIntyre, A. (ed.) Business and Government in Industrialising Asia, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 244–267.Google Scholar
  23. Moertopo, A. (1975) Buruh dan Tani dalam Pembangunan, Center for Strategic and International Studies, Jakarta.Google Scholar
  24. Reeve, D. (1985) Golkar of Indonesia: An Alternative to the Party System, Oxford University Press, Singapore.Google Scholar
  25. Rokhani, E. (2006) ‘Konflik antar serikat buruh: Suatu studi pada tiga perusahaan yang memiliki serikat buruh lebih dari satu’, Masters Thesis, University of Indonesia, Jakarta.Google Scholar
  26. Rokhani, E. (2008) ‘Inter-union conflict in three Indonesian factories’, Labor and Management in Development, 9. Available at http://www.nla.gov.au/openpublish/index.php/lmd/article/viewFile/1362/1645 (accessed 15 April 2012).Google Scholar
  27. SMERU (2002) Industrial Relations in Jabodetabek, Bandung, and Surabaya during the Freedom to Organize Era, SMERU, Jakarta.Google Scholar
  28. Sukarno, M. (1979) Pembaharuan Gerakan Buruh di Indonesia dan Hubungan Perburuhan Pancasila, Alumni, BandungGoogle Scholar
  29. Suryomenggolo, J. (2008) ‘Labour, politics and the law: A legal-political analysis of Indonesia’s labour law reform program’, Labour and Management in Development, 9. Available at http://www.nla.gov.au/openpublish/index.php/lmd/article/viewFile/1358/1642 (accessed 15 April 2012).Google Scholar
  30. Tjandra, S. (2008) ‘Understanding workers’ law reform in Indonesia 1998–2004’, Labour and Management in Development, 9. Available at http://www.nla.gov.au/openpublish/index.php/lmd/article/viewFile/1357/1641 (accessed 10 February 2012).Google Scholar
  31. Tjandra, S. (2010) ‘Disputing labour dispute settlement: Indonesian workers’ access to justice’, Law, Social Justice & Global Development Journal, 1. Available at http://www.go.warwick.ac.uk/elj/lgd/2010_1/tjandra (accessed 10 February 2012).Google Scholar
  32. Tjandraningsih, I. and Nugroho, H. (2008) ‘The flexibility regime and organised labour in Indonesia’, Labour and Management in Development, 9. Available at http://www.nla.gov.au/openpublish/index.php/lmd/article/viewFile/1360/1643 (accessed 15 April 2012).Google Scholar
  33. Tjandraningsih, I., Nugroho, H. and Tjandra, S. (2008) Buruh vs. Investasi? Mendorong Peraturan Perburuhan yang Adil di Indonesia, Akatiga, Bandung.Google Scholar
  34. Warouw, N. (2006) ‘Community-based agencies as the entrepreneur’s instruments of control in post-Suharto’s Indonesia’, Asia Pacific Business Review, 12/2: 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. WRC (2008) WRC Assessment re PT Mulia Knitting (Indonesia): Findings, Recommendations, and Status Report, Workers’ Rights Consortium. Available at http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu (accessed 10 February 2012).Google Scholar
  36. Yanti, E. (2003) ‘The GSBI experience in Indonesia’, Asian Labour Update, 48 (July–September). Available at http://www.amrc.org.hk/alu_article/union_ busting/the_gsbi_experience_in_indonesia (accessed 1 May 2012).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Michele Ford 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michele Ford

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations