Suffering Art Gladly pp 45-67 | Cite as
A Lust of the Mind: Curiosity and Aversion in Eighteenth-Century British Aesthetics
Abstract
Theories that offer hedonic analyses of aesthetic value confront a stubborn version of a traditional question: What accounts for the profound value found in art that arouses disturbing emotions, if that value comprises enjoyment or pleasure? Tragedy arouses pity and terror, as well as grief, sorrow, even despair. Other forms of art deliberately prompt disgust, indignation, anxiety, dread, and a host of other uneasy affects hard to give precise names. All of these emotions are in some way ‘negative’; psychologically speaking, they are ‘painful’. This raises the familiar puzzle: How come human beings seek out experiences that produce pain of any sort? And what kind of pain is this anyway?
Keywords
Negative Emotion Eighteenth Century Phenomenal Quality Grave Disturbance Painful EmotionPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Addison, Joseph (1962 [1712]). Selections from The Tatler and The Spectator. Robert J. Allen (ed.) (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston).Google Scholar
- Austen, Jane (1989 [1818]). Northanger Abbey. Introduction by Margaret Drabble (New York: Penguin Signet Classic).Google Scholar
- Beattie, James (1996 [1783]). From Dissertations Moral and Political. Excerpted in Andrew Ashfield and Peter de Bolla (eds), The Sublime: A Reader in British Eighteenth-Century Aesthetic Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 182–194).Google Scholar
- Benedict, Elizabeth (2001). Curiosity: A Cultural History of Early Modern Inquiry (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
- Burke, Edmund (1958 [1757]). A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful. James T. Boulton (ed.) (South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press).Google Scholar
- Carroll, Noël (1990). The Philosophy of Horror: Or Paradoxes of the Heart (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
- Currie, Gregory (1995). ‘Imagination as Simulation: Aesthetics Meets Cognitive Science’, in Martin Davies and Tony Stone (eds), Mental Simulation: Evaluations and Applications (Oxford: Blackwell, 151–169).Google Scholar
- De Sousa, Ronald (1987). The Rationality of Emotions (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).Google Scholar
- Ekman, Paul (2003). ‘Sixteen Enjoyable Emotions’, Emotion Researcher 18: 6–7.Google Scholar
- Feagin, Susan (1992). ‘Monsters, Disgust, and Fascination’, Philosophical Studies 65: 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fisher, Philip (2003). Wonder, the Rainbow, and the Aesthetics of Rare Experiences (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
- Gaut, Berys (2008). ‘The Paradox of Horror’, in Alex Neill and Aaron Ridley (eds), Arguing about Art, 3rd edn (London: Routledge, 317–329).Google Scholar
- Gerard, Alexander (1963 [1759]). An Essay on Taste (Gainesville, FL: Scholars’ Facsimiles and Reprints).Google Scholar
- Goldie, Peter (2000). The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
- Hobbes, Thomas (1958 [1651]). Leviathan, Parts 1 and 2. Herbert W. Schneider (ed.) (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill).Google Scholar
- Hume, David (1964 [1757]). ‘Of Tragedy’, in T. H. Green and T. H. Grose (eds), David Hume: Philosophical Works (Aalen: ScientiaVerlag [reprint of London 1882], 258–265).Google Scholar
- Hume, David (1973 [1739]). A Treatise of Human Nature. (London: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
- Hutcheson, Francis (1969 [1742]). An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections. Introduction by Paul McReynolds. (Gainesville, FL: Scholars’ Facsimiles and Reprints).Google Scholar
- Hutcheson, Francis (1973 [1725]). An Inquiry Concerning Beauty, Order, Harmony, Design. Peter Kivy (ed.) (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff).Google Scholar
- Ibrahim, Annie (2012). Qu’est-ce que la curiosité? (Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin).Google Scholar
- Inan, Ilhan (2012). The Philosophy of Curiosity (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
- Korsmeyer, Carolyn (2011). Savoring Disgust: The Foul and the Fair in Aesthetics (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Levinson, Jerrold (1990). ‘Music and Negative Emotion’, in Levinson, Jerrold (ed.), Music, Art, and Metaphysics: Essays in Philosophical Aesthetics (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 306–335).Google Scholar
- Levinson, Jerrold (1996). ‘Pleasure and the Value of Works of Art’, in Levinson, Jerrold (ed.), The Pleasures of Aesthetics: Philosophical Essays (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 11–24).Google Scholar
- Levinson, Jerrold (1997). ‘Emotion in Response to Art: A Survey of the Terrain’, in Mette Hjort and Sue Laver (eds), Emotion and the Arts (New York: Oxford University Press, 20–34).Google Scholar
- Merivale, Amyas (2011). ‘Mixed Feelings, Mixed Metaphors: Hume on Tragic Pleasure’, British Journal of Aesthetics 51: 259–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Neill, Alex (1992). ‘On a Paradox of the Heart’, Philosophical Studies 65: 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Neill, Alex (1999). ‘Hume’s Singular Phaenomenon’, British Journal of Aesthetics 39: 112–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Robinson, Jenefer (2005). Deeper than Reason: Emotion and its Role in Literature, Music, and Art (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schier, Flint (1983). ‘Tragedy and the Community of Sentiment’, in Peter Lamarque (ed.), Philosophy and Fiction (Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press, 73–92).Google Scholar
- Stocker, Michael (1983). ‘Psychic Feelings: Their Importance and Irreducibility’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61: 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smith, Adam (1984 [1759]). The Theory of the Moral Sentiments, D. D. Raphael and A. L. Macfie (eds) (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund).Google Scholar
- Solomon, Robert (1980). ‘Emotions and Choice’, in Amélie Oksenberg Rorty (ed.), Explaining Emotions (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 251–281).Google Scholar
- Townsend, Dabney (2001). Hume’s Aesthetic Theory (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
- Whitaker, Katie (1996). ‘The Culture of Curiosity’, in Cultures of Natural History (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 75–90).Google Scholar