Give and Take? Child Sponsors and the Ethics of Giving

  • Frances Rabbitts
Chapter

Abstract

It is self-evident that child sponsorship (CS) should be set up to benefit the lives of its recipients in some way. Plan UK assures potential sponsors that ‘Your donations help a whole community through funding projects such as building schools, digging wells and providing vaccinations’ (Plan UK, 2013). Compassion UK argues that in its direct benefit programme ‘the faithful financial support of the individual sponsor equips the child for the future by providing for their core needs’ (Compassion UK, 2013). SOS Children, which provides homes for orphaned and abandoned children, explains its vision as ‘a loving home for every child’, where sponsorship provides children with ‘new families for life’ (SOS Children, 2013). Despite its varying setups, then, CS is unfailingly sold as a charitable act that can make a tangible difference to beneficiaries. Its success is measured and marketed accordingly, often (for instance) through ‘success stories’ of sponsored children who have become high achievers, or through statistics about community welfare. Understandably, then, debates about sponsorship focus mostly on its material and social impacts on recipients, with attention rarely paid to its other dimensions. And yet, sponsorship constructs meaning in more ways than one, shaping and impacting international non-governmental organizations (INGOs) themselves, and drawing together beneficiaries and INGOs with sponsors in sponsorship ‘relationships’.

Keywords

Global Citizenship Church Community Family Support Work Charity Donation Broad Morality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. ActionAid US (2013) What You’ll Receive, http://www.actionaid.org.uk/sponsor-a-child/what-youll-receive, date accessed 3 June 2013.Google Scholar
  2. Allahyari, R. (2000) Visions of Charity: Volunteer Workers and Moral Community (Berkeley: University of California Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett, C. and Land, D. (2007) ‘Geographies of generosity: Beyond the “moral turn”’, Geoforum, 38, 6, 1065–1075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnett, C., Cloke, P., Clarke, N. and Malpass, A. (2005) ‘Consuming ethics: Articulating the subjects and spaces of ethical consumption’, Antipode, 37, 1, 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BHA [British Humanist Association], (2013) BHA website, http://www.humanism.org.uk, date accessed 3 June 2013.Google Scholar
  6. Bornstein, E. (2001) ‘Child sponsorship, evangelism, and belonging in the work of World Vision Zimbabwe’, American Ethnologist, 28, 3, 595–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Burman, E. (1994) ‘Poor children: Charity appeals and ideologies of childhood’, International Journal of Psychology and Psychotherapy, 12, 1, 29–36.Google Scholar
  8. Cloke, P. and Beaumont, J. (2012) ‘Geographies of postsecular rapprochement in the city 1’, Progress in Human Geography, 37, 1, 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cloke, P., Johnsen, S. and May, J. (2005) ‘Exploring ethos? Discourses of “charity” in the provision of emergency services for homeless people’, Environment and Planning A, 37, 3, 385–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coles, R. (1997) Rethinking Generosity: Critical Theory and the Politics of Caritas (New York: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
  11. Compassion UK (2013) About Sponsorship, http://www.compassionuk.org/about-sponsorship, date accessed 3 June 2013.Google Scholar
  12. Derrida, J. (1992) Given Time: Counterfeit Money (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  13. Hall, S. M. (2011) ‘Exploring the “ethical everyday”: An ethnography of the ethics of family consumption’, Geofomm, 42, 6, 627–637.Google Scholar
  14. Korf, B. (2006) ‘Geography and Benedict XVI’, Area, 38, 3, 326–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Manzo, K. (2008) ‘Imaging humanitarianism: NGO identity and the iconography of childhood’, Antipode, 40, 4, 632–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mauss, M. (1924) The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. Trans. W.D. Halls (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  17. New Internationalist (1989) Simply…Why You Should Not Sponsor A Child, Issue 194, April 1989, http://newint.org/features/1989/04/05/simply/, date accessed 3 June 2013.Google Scholar
  18. Ove, P. (2013) ‘“Change a life. Change your own”: Child sponsorship, the dis-course of development, and the production of ethical subjects’. Doctoral thesis, Faculty of Graduate Studies, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  19. Plan UK (2013) Sponsor a Child, http://www.plan-uk.org/sponsor-a-child/, date accessed 3 June 2013.Google Scholar
  20. Rabbitts, F. (2012) ‘Child sponsorship, ordinary ethics and the geographies of charity’, Geoforum, 43, 5, 926–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Save the Children (2013) Sponsor a Child, http://www.savethechildren.org/ site/c.8rKLIXMGIpI4E/b.6146367/, date accessed 1 October 2013.Google Scholar
  22. Selinger-Morris, S. (2012) I Was Dumped by My Sponsor Child, http://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/6639200/I-was-dumped-by-my-sponsor-child, date accessed 3 June 2013.Google Scholar
  23. Smith, M. (2004) ‘Contradiction and change? NGOs, schools and the public faces of development’, Journal of International Development, 16, 5, 741–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. SOS Children (2013) SOS UK homepage, http://www.soschildrensvillages.org.uk/, date accessed 3 June 2013.Google Scholar
  25. Toybox (2013) What Our Sponsors Say, http://www.toybox.org/uk/give/child-sponsorship/what-our-sponsors-say.aspx, date accessed 3 June 2013.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Frances Rabbitts 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frances Rabbitts

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations