‘We’re Not Making Forward Progress’: Postfeminist Hypermasculinity in Heat

  • Vincent M. Gaine
Chapter

Abstract

Michael Mann is a director who, seemingly, lives up to his surname. Over the course of a career of more than 30 years, Mann has come to be regarded as a director of films that are, according to BBC film critic Mark Kermode, ‘about guys’.1 In its portrayal of male cultural identity, Mann’s 1995 crime drama Heat displays a hypermasculinity that spirals into an implosive vortex that has a destructive effect on social relations. The film presents gender identities and relations that are unsustainable, and the characters’ insistence upon such identities and relations generates the implosive vortex. The construction of gender undertaken by the film’s characters is not simply traditional and pre-feminist, but post-feminist, as the construction of gender includes an assumption that the goals of feminism have been accomplished. This assumption both underpins the postfeminist sensibility within the film, and excludes the possibility of dialogue between genders, leading to the eventual disintegration of human interaction. Through its portrayal of postfeminist masculinity, Heat demonstrates the need for dialogue between the sexes and the dangers of failing to attend to this need.

Keywords

Popular Culture Male Character Female Character Feminist Politics Masculine Identity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Pam Cook, ‘Border Crossings: Women and Film in Context’, in Women and Film: A Sight and Sound Reader, ed. by Pam Cook and Philip Dodd (London: Scarlet Press, 1993), p. x.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Tania Modleski, Feminism Without Women: Culture and Criticism in a ‘Postfeminist’ Age (London: Routledge, 1991), p. 3.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Diane Negra and Yvonne Tasker, ‘Introduction: Feminist Politics and Postfeminist Culture’, in Interrogating Post-Feminism: Gender and the Politics of Popular Culture, ed. by Diane Negra and Yvonne Tasker (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007), p. 22.Google Scholar
  4. 8.
    Vicki Coppock, Deena Haydon and Ingrid Richter, The Illusions of ‘Post-Feminism’: New Women, Old Myths (Abingdon: Taylor and Francis, 1995)Google Scholar
  5. Liz Sperling and Mairead Owen, Women and Work: The Age of Post-feminism? (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2000).Google Scholar
  6. 9.
    Carol J. Clover, ‘Falling Down and the Rise of the Average White Male’, in Women and Film: A Sight and Sound Reader, ed. by Pam Cook and Phillip Dodd (London: Scarlet Press, 1993), pp. 138–147Google Scholar
  7. Linda Ruth Williams, ‘Everything in Question: Women and Film in Prospect’, in Women and Film: A Sight and Sound Reader, ed. by Pam Cook and Phillip Dodd (London: Scarlet Press, 1993), pp. xxiv–xxixGoogle Scholar
  8. Lisa Purse, Contemporary Action Cinema (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 12.
    Angela McRobbie, Postmodernism and Popular Culture (London: Routledge, 1994), p. 72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Imelda Whelelan, Overloaded: Popular Culture and the Future of Feminism (London: The Women’s Press, 2000), p. 93.Google Scholar
  11. 13.
    Nick James, Heat (London: BFI, 2002), p. 8.Google Scholar
  12. 14.
    Ian Shadoian, Dreams and Dead Ends: The American Gangster Film (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
  13. Fran Mason, American Gangster Cinema: From Little Caesar to Pulp Fiction (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Martin Rubin, Thrillers (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)Google Scholar
  15. Edward Mitchell, ‘Apes and Essences: Some Sources of Significance in the American Gangster Film’, in Film Genre Reader III, ed. by Barry Keith Grant (Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 2003), pp. 219–228.Google Scholar
  16. 20.
    Rosalind Gill and David Hansen-Miller, “Lad Flicks”: Discursive Reconstructions of Masculinity in Film’, in Feminism at the Movies, ed. by Hilary Radner and Rebecca Stringer (New York: Routledge, 2011), pp. 36–50.Google Scholar
  17. 30.
    Laura Kipnis, ‘Adultery’, Critical Inquiry, 24:2 (1998), p. 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 31.
    Susan Leonard, ‘“I Hate My Job, I Hate Everybody Here”: Adultery, Boredom, and the “Working Girl” in Twenty-First Century American Cinema’, in Interrogating Post-Feminism: Gender and the Politics of Popular Culture, ed. by Diane Negra and Yvonne Tasker (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2007), pp. 100–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 35.
    Mark E. Wildermuth, Blood in the Moonlight: Michael Mann and Information Age Cinema (Jefferson: McFarland and Company, Inc., 2005), pp. 135–150.Google Scholar
  20. 36.
    See Wildermuth, Blood in the Moonlight, p. 148; James, Heat, p. 73; Vincent M. Gaine, Existentialism and Social Engagement in the Films of Michael Mann (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011), p. 102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 37.
    Steven Rybin, The Cinema of Michael Mann (Plymouth: Lexington Books, 2007), p. 127.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Vincent M. Gaine 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vincent M. Gaine

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations