Advertisement

Total, Thus Broken: Chuch’e Sasang and North Korea’s Terrain of Subjectivity

  • Cheehyung Kim
Part of the Mass Dictatorship in the Twentieth Century book series (MASSD)

Abstract

Vinalon (vinylon) is a textile fibre made from the common chemical compound polyvinyl alcohol. In North Korea it is often called chuch’e som, or ‘cotton of self-reliance’. Vinalon was so named due to its place in North Korea’s history as a home-grown product that relieved the dire need for textiles in the post-Korean War period. Recently, this most independent fibre made a comeback in North Korea, when the February Eight Vinalon Complex — the factory where vinalon was first produced, back in 1961 — reopened in 2010 after a 16-year-long hiatus that began as North Korea’s state-socialist economy collapsed in the mid-1990s. During his visit to the factory in February 2010 to provide ‘on-the-spot guidance’ (made famous by his father), Kim Jong II (Kim Chŏngil) called the factory the model of chuch’e kongŏp (industry of self-reliance) because its workers had ‘revived the dying factory with their indomitable will’.1 His visit made the front page of Rodong Sinmun, the main party newspaper, and in the newspaper’s multiday coverage, the word chuch’e is mentioned numerous times in reference to vinalon, the factory, and the workers. The word describes not only things but also people: the fabric of self-reliance can come only from the hands of indomitably willed workers.

Keywords

Public Sphere Subject Position Private Sphere Socialist Revolution Black Panther Party 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Nodong sinmun chŏngch’i podobu, ‘Widaehan yŏngdoja Kim Chŏng-il tongji kkesŏ hyŏndaejŏk ŭro kkuryŏjin ip’al pinallon yŏnhapgiŏpso rŭl hyŏnjijido hasiyŏtda’, Nodong sinmun (8 February 2010), 1–2.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Hŏ Myŏngsuk, ‘On nara ga hŭngsŏng inda’, Rodong Sinmun (11 February 2010), 4.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    Im Chihyŏn (Jie-hyun Lim), ‘Ilsang ŭi miro e kach’in kwŏllyŏg ŭi kkum’, in Lim Jie-Hyun and Kim Yong-Woo, eds, Taejung tokjae: Ilsang ŭi yongmang kwa mimong (Seoul: Ch’aeksesang, 2007), p. 555.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    Kim Il Sung (Kim Ilsŏng), ‘Uri tang ŭi chuch’esasang kwa konghwagukjŏngbu ŭi taenaewejongch’aek ŭi myŏtkaji munje e taehayŏ’, Kim Il-sŏng chŏjakchip 27 (P’yŏngyang: Chosŏn Rodongdang Ch’ulp’ansa, 1984), pp. 390–94.Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    Hwang Changyŏp, Pukhan ŭi chinsil kwa hŏwi (Seoul: Sidae Chŏngsin, 1999), pp. 146–47.Google Scholar
  6. 8.
    Nick Mansfield, Subjectivity: Theories of the Self from Freud to Haraway (New York: New York University Press, 2000), p. 15.Google Scholar
  7. 10.
    B. R. Myers, The Cleanest Race (New York: Melville House, 2010), p. 47.Google Scholar
  8. 14.
    Terry Eagleton, Ideology (London, Verso, 2007), p. 30.Google Scholar
  9. 15.
    Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism (New York: Harcourt, 1968), p. 438.Google Scholar
  10. 16.
    Susan Buck-Morss, Dreamworld and Catastrophe (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000), p. 140.Google Scholar
  11. 17.
    Jochen Hellbeck, ‘Working, Struggling, Becoming’, Russian Review 60, no. 3 (2001), p. 358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 18.
    Choi Chatterjee and Karen Petrone, ‘Models of Selfhood and Subjectivity’, Slavic Review 67/4 (2008), 978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 19.
    Michael Robinson, ‘National Identity and the Thought of Sin Ch’aeho’, Journal of Korean Studies 5 (1984), 121–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 22.
    B. R. Myers, ‘The Watershed That Wasn’t’, Acta Koreana 9/1 (2006), 104–5.Google Scholar
  15. 23.
    Kim Il Sung, Revolution and Socialist Construction in Korea Selected Writings of Kim Il Sung (New York: International Publishers, 1971), pp. 87, 89.Google Scholar
  16. 25.
    Yoon T. Kuark, ‘North Korea’s Industrial Development during the Post-war Period’, China Quarterly 14 (1963), 61.Google Scholar
  17. 27.
    Chosŏn Chigŏp Ch’ongdongmaeng, Ch’ŏllima kisu tokbon (P’yŏngyang: Chigŏp Tongmaeng Ch’ulp’ansa, 1963), p. 26.Google Scholar
  18. 29.
    Central Statistical Board, Statistical Returns of National Economy of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (1946–1960) (P’yŏngyang: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1961), pp. 36–7.Google Scholar
  19. 32.
    Nodong sinmun sasŏl, ‘Chosŏnminjujuŭi inmingonghwaguk sahoejuŭi hŏnpŏp’, Nodong sinmun (28 December 1972), p. 2.Google Scholar
  20. 33.
    Nodong sinmun sasŏl, ‘Widaehan chuch’esasang ŭi pitballo sahoejuŭi, kongsangjuŭiŭi sŭngniŭi kirŭl palk’yŏjun tagwŏrhan magsŭ-reninjuŭi munhŏn’, Nodong sinmun (27 December 1972), p. 2.Google Scholar
  21. 34.
    Sin Ilch’ŏl, Pukhan chuch’e chŏrak yŏn’gu (P’aju: Nanam, 1993), p. 192.Google Scholar
  22. 35.
    Sin Ilch’ŏl, ‘Pukhan ideology ŭi ponjil’, Kyegan Sasang 7 (1990), 304.Google Scholar
  23. 36.
    On the international spread of chuch’e, see Charles K. Armstrong’s ‘Juche and North Korea’s global aspirations’, North Korea International Documentation Project, Working Paper #1 (Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, 2009).Google Scholar
  24. 37.
    Kim Il Sung, Li Yuk-Sa, and Eldridge Cleaver, Juche! The Speeches and Writings of Kim Il sung (New York: Grossman, 1972).Google Scholar
  25. 38.
    The story of Korean-Japanese who are pro-North Korea is complex. The membership of the General Association has declined today to around 150,000 (out of over 600,000 Korean residents in Japan), and their relationship to North Korea has changed. They no longer officially endorse chuch’e, and they are more critical of the North Korean state. Nevertheless, they maintain that the ethnic nationalism created and promoted by North Korea is important to their identity. On this topic, see Sonia Ryang’s North Koreans in Japan: Language, Ideology, and Identity (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1997).Google Scholar
  26. 39.
    The estimates of the number of people who died during the 1990s due to famine and disease range from 200,000 to 2 million. The 1990s was the most difficult period for the North Korean people since the Korean War. On the accounts of life during the 1990s, see Choŭn pŏttŭl, Pukhansaramdŭri malhanŭnpukhan iyagi (Seoul: Chŏngt’o Ch’ulp’an, 2000).Google Scholar
  27. 40.
    Han S. Park, North Korea (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2002).Google Scholar
  28. 41.
    See Andrew S. Natsios, The Great North Korean Famine (Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace Press, 2001), and Stephan Haggard and Marcus Noland, Famine in North Korea (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007).Google Scholar
  29. 43.
    Ham T’aekyŏng and Ku Kab’u, ‘Pukahan ŭi konggwa sa: ironhwa rŭl wihan pigyo’, in Yi Wuyŏng, (ed.), Pukhan tosijumin ŭi sachŏk yŏngyŏk yŏn’gu (Paju: Hanul, 2008), p. 31.Google Scholar
  30. 44.
    Slavoj Žižek, ‘Introduction: the Spectre of Ideology’, in Slavoj Žižek, ed., Mapping Ideology (London: Verso, 1994), p. 4.Google Scholar
  31. 45.
    Henri Lefebvre, Critique of Everyday Life, vol. 2 (London: Verso, 2008), pp. 180–81.Google Scholar
  32. 49.
    Ch’oe Hojin, ‘Uri nŭn wae chuch’esasang ŭro mujanghaeya hanŭnga’, Ch’ŏllima 1 (1973), 39.Google Scholar
  33. 50.
    Ch’oe Hojin, ‘Chuch’e sasang ŭi kibon e taehayŏ (che-sam hoe)’, Ch’ŏllima, 4 (1973), 57.Google Scholar
  34. 51.
    Ch’oe Hojin, ‘Chuch’e sasang ŭl kuhyŏn hagi wihan tangmyŏn chungsim kwaŏp ŭn muŏsin’ga’, Ch’ŏllima 11 (1973), 14.Google Scholar
  35. 52.
    Ch’oe Hojin, ‘Chuch’e sasang ŭi kibon e taehayŏ (che-il hoe)’, Ch’ŏllima 2 (1973), 43, 45; ‘Chuch’e sasang ŭi kibon e taehayŏ (che-i hoe)’, Ch’ŏllima 3 (1973), 30; ‘Chuch’e sasang ŭi kibon e taehayŏ (che-sa hoe)’, Ch’ŏllima 4 (1973), 25.Google Scholar
  36. 53.
    Ch’oe Hojin, ‘Uri nara nŭn widaehan chuch’esasang ŭi chogugida’, Ch’ŏllima 9 (1973), 31.Google Scholar
  37. 56.
    The malleability of human character was an important premise in the socialism of the twentieth century. As Fitzpatrick writes, ‘human remaking was part of the whole notion of transformation that was at the heart of the Soviet project’. Sheila Fitzpatrick, Everyday Stalinism: Soviet Russia in the 1930s (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), p. 75.Google Scholar
  38. 57.
    Chosŏn Yesul Yŏnghwa Ch’waryŏngso, Uriyŏllch’ap’anmaewŏn (P’yŏngyang, 1972).Google Scholar
  39. 58.
    Yi Kuyŏl, Pukhan misul osipnyŏn (Seoul: Tolbegae, 2001).Google Scholar
  40. 60.
    Ernesto Laclau, Emancipation(s) (London: Verso, 1996), p. 21.Google Scholar
  41. 61.
    Janice C. H. Kim’s To Live to Work (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2009), p. 76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 64.
    See chs 6 and 7 in Karatani Kojin, Transcritique (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Cheehyung Kim 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cheehyung Kim

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations