Transnational Flows of Military Talent: The Contrasting Experiences of Burma and Thailand since the 1940s

  • Nicholas Farrelly

Abstract

Parts of mainland South East Asia claim the tragic distinction of hosting the world’s longest running civil wars. Some of these wars began in the 1940s; fighters from World War II enjoyed no respite as they were quickly drawn into the local conflagrations that followed the global war. While combat, support, training and supply have remained largely the preserve of South East Asians there have been foreigners, like the ‘visitors’ introduced above, who have sought to make their own contributions. Across decades, transnational flows of foreign military talent have remained integral to the landscape of security, resistance and conflict in this region. Whether ‘government advisors’, ‘mercenaries’, ‘adventurers’ or ‘loons’ they have become enmeshed in wars of ambush and attrition where any front lines are obscured by a sometimes impenetrable mix of history, ethnicity, geography and culture. Understanding the experiences of foreign fighters requires attention to the long-term social, political and economic characteristics of the region. To explain transnational flows of military talent in mainland South East Asia this chapter explores the situation in two adjacent countries, Burma2 and Thailand, and argues that they present contrasting yet mutually reinforcing histories of foreign entanglements. The focus here is the ethnic minority forces, former colonial officers, Chinese militias, government advisors and ‘adventurers’ who have helped shape South East Asia’s long wars.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Jonathan Falla, True Love and Bartholomew: Rebels on the Burmese Border (Cambridge, 1991), p. 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 5.
    Desmond Ball and Nicholas Farrelly, ‘Eastern Burma: Long Wars Without Exhaustion’, in Edward Aspinall and Robin Jeffrey (eds), Diminishing Conflicts in Asia and the Pacific (London, 2012) [forthcoming].Google Scholar
  3. 6.
    John F. Cady, Southeast Asia: Its Historical Development (New York, 1964), p. 190;Google Scholar
  4. Christopher Duffy, Siege Warfare: The Fortress in the Early Modern World, 1494– 1660 (London, 1979), p. 230;Google Scholar
  5. Victor B. Lieberman, ‘Europeans, Trade, and the Unification of Burma, c. 1540–1620’, Oriens Extremus, 27 (1980), p. 207.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    Nicholas Tarling, The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia. Volume One, Part Two, From C.1500–C.1800 (Cambridge, 1999), p. 20;Google Scholar
  7. and see also Warren I. Cohen, East Asia at the Centre: Four Thousand Years of Engagement With the World (New York, 2000), p. 208.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Edmund Leach, Political Systems of Highland Burma (London 1954), p. 186.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    For many pertinent details on such groups, see James C. Scott, The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia (New Haven, CT, 2009).Google Scholar
  10. 12.
    Mary Patricia Callahan, Making Enemies: War and State Building in Burma (Ithaca, NY, 2004), p. 36.Google Scholar
  11. 15.
    Chao, Tzang Yanghwe The Shan of Burma: Memoirs of a Shan Exile (Singapore, 1987), p. 91, fn 22.Google Scholar
  12. 16.
    See Ian Fellowes-Gordon, Amiable Assassins: The Story of the Kachin Guerrillas of North Burma (London, 1957);Google Scholar
  13. Lance Q. Zedric and Michael F. Dilley, Elite Warriors: 300 Years of America’s Best Fighting Troops (Ventura, 1996), p. 146;Google Scholar
  14. Myihtoi Gam Awng, Myihtoi Naw A Ahtik Labau (The Biography of Subedar Major Myihtoi Naw) (Myitkyina, 2000), pp. 41–3;Google Scholar
  15. Hpauwung Tang Gun and Chyauchyi Naw Ja, Hkringhtwang Share Shagan, Jiwoi Prat Ban (Heritage Warriors from the Ancestor’s Era, Volume 1) (Myitkyina, 2003), p. 3.Google Scholar
  16. 19.
    Janet C. Sturgeon, ‘Border Practices, Boundaries, and the Control of Resource Access: A Case from China, Thailand and Burma’, Development and Change, 35, 3 (2004), p. 470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 21.
    Jim Morris, ‘Preface’, in Rob Krott (ed), Save the Last Bullet for Yourself: A Soldier of Fortune in the Balkans and Somalia (Havertown, PA, 2008), p. xi.Google Scholar
  18. 24.
    Union of Myanmar — Ministry of Information, The Conspiracy of Treasonous Minions within the Myanmar Naing-Ngan [Nation] and Traitorous Cohorts Abroad (Rangoon, 1989), p. 303.Google Scholar
  19. 28.
    David Everett with Kingsley Flett, Shadow Warrior (Camberwell, 2008).Google Scholar
  20. 29.
    Thomas James Bleming, War in Karen Country: Armed Struggle for a Free and Independent Karen State in Southeast Asia (Bloomington, IN, 2007).Google Scholar
  21. 32.
    William H. Mott, United States Military Assistance: An Empirical Perspective (Westport, CT, 2002), p. 235.Google Scholar
  22. 33.
    See Daniel Fineman, A Special Relationship: The United States and Military Government in Thailand, 1947–1958 (Honolulu, HI, 1997); Mott, United States Military, pp. 235–45.Google Scholar
  23. 34.
    For an important account of this policy, see Amos A. Jordan, Foreign Aid and the Defense of Southeast Asia (New York, 1962).Google Scholar
  24. 35.
    Jim Glassman, Thailand at the Margins: Internationalization of the State and the Transformation of Labour (Oxford, 2004), p. 68.Google Scholar
  25. 36.
    Janice E. Thomson, Mercenaries, Pirates, And Sovereigns: State-Building And Extraterritorial Violence In Early Modern Europe (Princeton, NJ, 1996), p. 94.Google Scholar
  26. 37.
    Robert Ruth, In Buddha’s Company: Thai Soldiers in the Vietnam War (Honolulu, HI, 2011).Google Scholar
  27. 38.
    Benedict Anderson, Richard O’Gorman and Ruchira Mendiones, In the Mirror: Literature and Politics in Siam in the American Era (Ithaca, NY, 1985), p. 31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Nicholas Farrelly 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas Farrelly

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations