Advertisement

Understanding Neoliberalism as Economization: The Case of the Environment

  • Fikret Adaman
  • Yahya M. Madra
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)

Abstract

In the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, governments and international finance organizations began to call for and take regulatory measures in order to prevent similar breakdowns in the future, causing some commentators to quickly pronounce neoliberalism dead. Consider, for instance, a recent example: while writing this chapter, a special report in the 21–27 January 2012 issue of The Economist — embellished with a red and black portrait of Lenin on the cover, triumphantly holding a cigar with a dollar sign on it — lamented that the ‘emerging world’s new model’ would be ‘the rise of state capitalism’. Yet, this line of argument is based on a rather simplified and narrow reading of neoliberalism, as a purer laissez-fair regime where spontaneous markets reign free with minimal role for governments. A closer look at its brief history challenges this reading of neoliberalism as a project of marketization that unfolds on both the practical and ideational levels. Practically speaking, governments have always played an active role in designing, instituting and facilitating the operation of markets, not only before but also under neoliberalism. In other words, the track record of three decades of neoliberal hegemony at a global scale demonstrates that the much-invoked dichotomy between state and private capitalism fails to do justice to the intensity and depth of technocratic—bureaucratic state involvement in implementing neoliberalism (Harvey 2005; Peck 2010).

Keywords

Private Property Abatement Cost Environmental Governance Private Partnership Chicago School 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adaman, F. (2012) ‘Power Inequalities in Explaining the Link between Natural Hazards and Unnatural Disasters’, Development and Chang 43(1): 395–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adaman, F. and P. Devine (1996) ‘The Economic Calculation Debate: Lessons for Socialists’, Cambridge Journal of Economic 20(5): 523–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adler, J.H. (2002) ‘Book Review of Free Market Environmentalis by Anderson and Leal’, The Cato Journa 22(1): 182–8.Google Scholar
  4. Adler, J.H. (2009) ‘Taking Property Rights Seriously: The Case of Climate Change’, Social Philosophy and Polic 26(2): 296–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, T.L. and D.R. Leal (2001) Free Market Environmentalism, second edition, New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arrow, K.J. (1974) The Limits of Organization, New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  7. Arsel, M. and B. Biischer (2012) ‘Changes and Continuities in Neoliberal Conservation and Market-based Environmental Policy’, Development and Chang 43(1): 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bardhan, P. and J. Roemer (1992) ‘Market Socialism: A Case for Rejuvenation’, Journal ofEconomic Perspective 6(3): 101–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baron, D.P. and R.B. Myerson (1982) ‘Regulating a Monopolist with Unknown Costs’, Econometric 50(4): 911–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Becker, G.S. (1976) The Economic Approach to Human Behavior, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bockmann, J. (2007) ‘The Origins of Neoliberalism between Soviet Socialism and Western Capitalism: A Galaxy without Borders’, Theory and Societ 36(4): 343–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bowles, S. and S.H. Hwang (2008) ‘Social Preferences and Public Economics: Mechanism Design When Social Preferences Depend on Incentives’, Journal of Public Economic 92(8–9): 1811–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brennan, G. and J. Buchanan (1985) The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy, Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, Inc.Google Scholar
  14. Campbell, J.L. (1998) ‘Institutional Analysis and the Role of Ideas in Political Economy’, Theory and Societ 27(3): 377–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cerny, G.P. (2008) ‘Embedding Neoliberalism: The Evolution of a Hegemonic Paradigm’, The Journal oflnternational Trade and Democrac 2(1): 1–46.Google Scholar
  16. Coase, R.H. (1960) ‘The Problem of Social Cost’, Journal of Law and Economic 3(4): 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cordato, R. (2004) ‘Toward an Austrian Theory of Environmental Economics’, The Quarterly Journal ofAustrian Economic 7(1): 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. calrg(an, K. and M. Callon (2009) ‘Economization, Part 1: Shifting Attention from the Economy towards Processes of Economization’, Economy and Societ 38(3): 369–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. calr*an, K. and M. Callon (2010) ‘Economization, Part 2: A Research Programme for the Study of Markets’, Economy and Society, 39(1): 1–32.Google Scholar
  20. Davis, M. (2006) Planet of Slums, London & New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  21. Dawson, G. (2011) ‘Free Markets, Property Rights and Climate Change: How to Privatize Climate Policy’, Libertarian Paper 3(10): 1–29.Google Scholar
  22. del Mar, D.P. (2011) Environmentalism, New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  23. Duménil, G. and D. Levy (2011) The Crisis of Neoliberalism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Epstein, G.A. (ed.) (2005) Financialization and the World Economy, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  25. Fine, B. and D. Milonakis (2009) From Economics Imperialism to Freakonomics: The Shifting Boundaries between Economics and Other Social Sciences, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Foucault, M. (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Coll’ege de France 1978/1979, Michel Senellart (ed.) and Graham Burchell (trans.), Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Friedman, M. (1962) Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Gibbard, A. (1973) ‘Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General Result’, Econometric 41(4): 587–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gibson-Graham, J.K. (2006) A Postcapitalist Politics, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  30. Gottinger, H.W. (2001) ‘Incentive Compatible Environmental Regulation’, Journal of Environmental Managemen 63(2): 163–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hardin, G. (1968) ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’, Scienc 162(3859): 1243–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harvey, D. (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hayek, F.A. (1948) Individualism and Economic Order, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Heynen, N., J. McCarthy, S. Prudham, and P. Robbins (2007) Neoliberal Environments: False Promises and Unnatural Consequences, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Hurwicz, L. (2008) ‘But Who Will Guard the Guardians?’ American Economic Revie 98(3): 577–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. IMF (2012) World Economic Outlook: Coping with High Debt and Sluggish Growth Available online: http://www.imf.org. (accessed: 15 December 2012).Google Scholar
  37. Jacobs, M. (1997) ‘Environmental Valuation, Deliberative Democracy and Public Decision-Making Institutions’, in J.B. Foster (ed.) Valuing Nature? Economics, Ethics, Environment, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Jebgerg, L. and L. Lando (1997) ‘Regulating a Polluting Firm under Asymmetric Information’, Environment and Resource Economic 10(3): 267–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kirzner, I.M. (2000) The Driving Force of the Market: Essays in Austrian Economics, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Klein, N. (2008) The Shock Doctrine: The Rise ofDisaster Capitalism, Toronto: Vintage.Google Scholar
  41. Krueger, A.O. (1974) ‘The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society’, American Economic Revie 64(3): 291–303.Google Scholar
  42. Leys, C. (2008) Total Capitalism: Market Politics, Market State, London: Merlin Press.Google Scholar
  43. MacKenzie, D. (2009) Material Markets: How Economic Agents Are Constructed, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. MacKenzie, D., F. Muniesa, and L. Siu (eds) (2007) Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity ofEconomics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Madra, Y.M. (2010) ‘Political Economy of Oil’, in R. Free (ed.) 21st Century Economics: A Reference Handbook, Newberry Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  46. Madra, Y.M. and F. Adaman (2010) ‘Public Economics after Neoliberalism: A Theoretical-Historical Perspective’, European Journal of History of Economic Though 17(4): 1079–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Marazzi, C. (2011) The Violence of Financial Capitalism, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  48. Martinez-Alier, J., G. Munda, and J. O’Neil (1999) ‘Commensurability and Compensability in Ecological Economics’, in M. O’Connor and C. Spash (eds) Valuation and the Environment: Theory, Method and Practice, Cheltenham & Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  49. Medema, S. (1994) Ronald H. Coase, London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Medema, S. (2009) The Hesitant Hand: Taming Self-Interest in the History of Economic Ideas, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mirowski, P. and D. Plehwe (eds) (2005) The Road from Mont Pelerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought Collective, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Mitchell, T. (2011) Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil, London & New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  53. Munda, G. (2008) Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation for a Sustainable Economy, Heidelberg & New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  54. Ozkaynak, B., F. Adaman, and P. Devine (2012) ‘The Identity of Ecological Economics: Retrospects and Prospects’, Cambridge Journal of Economic 36(5): 1123–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Peck, J. (2010) Constructions of Neoliberal Reason, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Peck, J. and N. Theodore (2010) ‘Mobilizing Policy: Models, Methods, and Mutations’, Geoforu 41(2): 169–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Peck, J., N. Theodore, and N. Brenner (2010) ‘Postneoliberalism and Its Malcontents’, Antipod 41(Supplement S1): 94–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pennington, M. (2005) ‘Liberty, Markets and Environmental Values: A Hayekian Defense of Free Market Environmentalism’, Independent Revie 10(1): 39–57.Google Scholar
  59. Peterson, J.M. and R.N. Boisvert (2004) ‘Incentive-Compatible Pollution Control Policies Under Asymmetric Information on Both Risk Preferences and Technology’, American Journal ofAgricultural Economic 86(2): 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Plehwe, D., B. Walpen, and G. NeunhOffer (eds) (2006) Neoliberal Hegemony: A Global Critique, London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  61. Plihon, D. (2011) ‘Financialization of the Economy — A Brief Introduction’, Conference Report, European Cross Networking Meeting on the Global Crises, 28–29 October 2011, Paris.Google Scholar
  62. Polanyi, K. (1944) The Great Transformation, Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  63. Ravetz, J.R. (2011) ‘Postnormal Science and the Maturing of the Structural Contradictions of Modern European Science’, Future 43(2): 142–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Resnick, S.R. and R.D. Wolff (2010) ‘The Economic Crisis: A Marxian Interpretation’, Rethinking Marxis 22(2): 170–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rothbard, M.N. (1982) ‘Law, Property Rights, and Air Pollution’, The Cato Journa 2(1): 55–99.Google Scholar
  66. Rubinstein, A. (1979) ‘Equilibrium in Supergames with the Overtaking Criterion’, Journal ofEconomic Theor 21(1): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Spash, C.L. (2011) ‘Carbon Trading: A Critique’, in J. Dryzek, R. Norgaard, and D. Schlossberg (eds) Oxford Handbook on Climate Change and Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Spulber, D.F. (1988) ‘Optimal Environmental Regulation with Asymmetric Information’, Journal of Public Economic 35(2): 163–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stavins, R.N. (2008) ‘Environmental Economics’, in S.N. Durlauf and L.E. Blume (eds) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economic (Second Edition), London & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  70. Stiglitz, J.E. (1993) Post Walrasian and Post Marxian Economics’, Journal of Economic Perspective 7(1): 109–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stiglitz, J.E. (1994) Whither Socialism Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  72. Stiglitz, J.E. (2010) Freefall, New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  73. Stroup, R.L. (2008) ‘Free-Market Environmentalism’, Library of Economics and Liberty Available online: www.econlib.org/library/Enc/FreeMarketEnvironmentalism.html. (accessed: 12 October 2011).Google Scholar
  74. Tickell, A. and J. Peck (2003) ‘Making Global Rules: Globalizaton or Neoliberalization?’, in J. Peck and H. Yeung (eds) Remaking the Global Economy, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  75. Tribe, K. (2009) ‘Political Economy of Modernity: Michel Foucault’s College de France Lectures of 1978 and 1979’, Economy and Societ 38(4): 679–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Turner, R.K., D. Pearce, and I. Bateman (1993) Environmental Economics: An Elementary Introduction, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  77. US Environmental Protection Agency (2000) Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses, Washington, DC: US EPA.Google Scholar
  78. Vanberg, V. (2001) The Constitution of Markets: Essays in Political Economy, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vanberg, V. (2009) ‘Liberal Constitutionalism, Constitutional Liberalism and Democracy’, Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics, 09/04, Freiburg: Walter Eucken Institute.Google Scholar
  80. Yamawaki, N. (2001) ‘Walter Eucken and Wilhelm Ropke: A Reappraisal of their Economic Thought and the Policy of Ordoliberalism’, in Y. Shionoya (ed.) The German Historical School: The Historical and Ethical Approach to Economics, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Fikret Adaman and Yahya M. Madra 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fikret Adaman
  • Yahya M. Madra

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations