A Place of Greater Safety? Securing Judgement in International Ethics

  • Kimberly Hutchings
Chapter

Abstract

To be vulnerable is to be able to be wounded, painfully transformed from the outside, in ways over which one has no control. Nussbaum points out that in a tradition of normative thinking going back to the Stoics, acknowledgement of vulnerability is the enemy of good judgement (Nussbaum 2001: 19–88). The ideal of judgement is one in which self-sufficient reason alone holds sway. Within this tradition of thought, authority and invulnerability become bound together — the judgements you can trust are the judgements that are safe from the literal and metaphorical knives of the world. As other chapters in this volume demonstrate, this Stoic legacy, mediated through enlightenment rationalism, is influential in predominant responses to human vulnerability in international politics. Theoretical and policy-oriented explanations and prescriptions relating to inequity, injury, harm and suffering in the contemporary world anchor their authority in an ideal of invulnerable judgement, that is to say a judgement that may be mistaken but cannot be wounded.

Keywords

Moral Judgement Actual World Political Theory Ethical Judgement Political Theorist 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Altman, A. and Wellman, C. H. (2008) ‘From humanitarian intervention to assassination: human rights and political violence’, Ethics Vol. 118, 228–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhabha, H. (1994) The Location of Culture (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  3. Brigg, M. and Bleiker, R. (2010) ‘Autoethnographic IR: exploring the self as a source of knowledge’, Review of International Studies Vol. 36, No. 3, 779–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brock, G. and Harry Brighouse, H. (eds) (2005) The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  5. Brown, C. (2002) Sovereignty, Rights and Justice (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar
  6. Caney, S. (2005) Justice beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chakrabarty, D. (2000) Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference (Princeton, NJ & Oxford: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, G. A. (2003) ‘Facts and Principles’, Philosophy and Public Affairs Vol. 3, No. 31, 211–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dauphinee, E. (2010) ‘The Ethics of Autoethnography’, Review of International Studies Vol. 36, No. 3, 799–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doty, R. L. (2010) ‘Autoethnography: making human connections’, Review of International Studies Vol. 4, No. 36, 1047–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dower, N. (2007) World Ethics: A New Agenda, 2nd Edition (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).Google Scholar
  12. Fabre, C. (2009) ‘Guns, food and liability to attack in war’, Ethics Vol. 120, 36–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fanon, F. (1986) Black Skin/White Masks, Markmann C. L. (trans.) (London: Pluto Press).Google Scholar
  14. Hutchings, K. (2010) Global Ethics: An Introduction (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar
  15. Löwenheim, O. (2010) ‘The “I” in IR: an autoethnographic account’, Review of International Studies Vol. 36, No. 4, 1023–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Miller, D. (2008) ‘Political Philosophy for Earthlings’, in Leopold D. and Stears M. (eds) Political Theory: Methods and Approaches (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 29–48.Google Scholar
  17. Nandy, A. (2002) Time Warps: Silent and Evasive Pasts in Indian Politics and Religion (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press).Google Scholar
  18. Nandy, A. (2004) Bonfire of the Creeds: The Essential Ashis Nandy in Esteva G. and Prakash M. S. (eds) (New Delhi: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  19. Nandy, A. (2009) The Intimate Enemy: Loss and Recovery of the Self Under Colonialism, 2nd Edition (New Delhi: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  20. Nussbaum, M. (2000)Women and Human Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nussbaum, M. (2001) Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pogge, T. (ed.) (2001) Global Justice (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
  23. Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  24. Rawls, J. (1999) The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  25. Rushing, S. (2010) ‘Preparing for politics: Judith Butler’s ethical dispositions’, Contemporary Political Theory Vol. 9, No. 3, 284–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Simmons, A. J. (2010) ‘Ideal and non-ideal theory’, Philosophy and Public Affairs Vol. 38, No. 1, 5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Singer, P. (1985) ‘On famine, affluence and morality’, in Beitz, C. R. et al. (eds) International Ethics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), pp. 247–261.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kimberly Hutchings 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kimberly Hutchings

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations