Global Overview: International Trends in Victimization and Recorded Crime

  • Jan van Dijk
  • Andromachi Tseloni
Part of the Crime Prevention and Security Management book series (CPSM)

Abstract

In this opening chapter, the focus is on a descriptive analysis of trends in victimization rates of a selection of mainly Western countries with a special focus on Europe. Our main sources of data are the six rounds of the International Crime Victims Survey carried out between 1989 and 2010. For some countries, the ICVS data have been checked against results from large-scale independently run national surveys, such as the National Crime Victimization Surveys of the US and the Dutch and British Crime Surveys from the same period.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aebi, M. (2004) ‘Crime Trends in Western Europe from 1990 to 2000’. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 10, pp.163–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aebi, M.F., Killias, M., Tavares, C. (2002) ‘Comparing Crime Rates: The International Crime (Victim) Survey, the European Sourcebook of Crime and Criminal Justice Statistics, and Interpol Statistics’. International Journal of Comparative Criminology, 2, pp.22–37.Google Scholar
  3. Aebi, M. and Linde, A. (2010) ‘Is There a Crime Drop in Western Europe?’ European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 15, pp.251–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, J. and Ruparel, C. (2006) Comparing BCS estimates and police counts of crime. London: Home Office. http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs06/comparingbcs.pdfGoogle Scholar
  5. Biderman, A.D. and Lynch, J.P (1991) Understanding crime incidence statistics: Why the UCR diverges from the NCS. New York: Springer Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Central Statistical Office Ireland (2004) Quarterly National Household Survey, Crime and Victimization. Quarter 4, 1998 and 2003.Google Scholar
  7. Cunningham, W., Strauchs, J., vanMeter, C. (1990) The Hallcrest Report II: Private Security Trends, 1970–2000. Stoneham, MA: Butterworths-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  8. Dijk, J.J.M. van (1994) ‘Understanding crime rates: On the interactions between the rational choices of victims and offenders’. British Journal of Criminology, 34, pp.47–65.Google Scholar
  9. Dijk, van J.J.M. (1999) The Experience of Crime and Justice, in G. Newman (ed.) Global Report on Crime and Justice. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dijk, J.J.M. van (2007) The World of Crime: Breaking the Silence on Problems of Security, Justice and Development across the World. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.Google Scholar
  11. Dijk, J.J.M. van (2008) The world of crime: Breaking the silence on problems of security, justice and development across the world. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dijk, J.J.M. van (2010) ‘The European Crime Falls: Security Driven?’ Newsletter of the European Society of Criminology, April 2010, pp.1 and 12.Google Scholar
  13. Dijk, J.J.M. van (2011) International trends in crime: The remarkable case of Georgia. Website Ministry of Justice, Georgia (www.justice.gov.ge/index.php?)Google Scholar
  14. Dijk, J.J.M. van and Steinmetz, C.H.D. (1980) The RDC victim surveys 1974–1979. The Hague: Ministry of Justice (Research and Documentation Centre). www.intervict /publications/personal pages.Google Scholar
  15. Dijk, J.J.M. van, Junger, M., and Sagel-Grande, I. (2011) ActueleCriminologie, 7e herzieneuitgave. Den Haag: SduUitgevers.Google Scholar
  16. Dijk, J.J.M. van, vanKesteren, J. and Smit, P. (2007) Criminal Victimization in an International Perspective: Key findings from the 2004–2005 ICVS and EU ICS. The Hague: Ministry of Justice/WODC.Google Scholar
  17. Flatley, J., et al. (2010) Crime in England and Wales: Findings from the British Crime Survey and from police recorded crime (Third edition). Home Office Statistical Office, July 2010.Google Scholar
  18. Farrell, G., Tilley, N., Tselon i, A. and Mailley, J. (2010) ‘Explaining and sustaining the crime drop: Clarifying the role of opportunity-related theories’. Crime Prevention and Community Safety: An International Journal, 12, pp.24–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Farrell, G, Tseloni, A., Mailley, J. and Tilley, N. (2011) ‘The Crime Drop and the Security Hypothesis’. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48, pp.147–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Farrington, D. P., Langan, P. and Tonry, M. (eds) (2004) Cross-National Studies in Crime and Justice. Washington DC: US Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  21. Freel, R. and French, B. (2008) Experience of Crime: Findings from the 2006/07 Northern Ireland Crime Survey. Research and Statistical Bulletin 1/2008. Belfast: Northern Ireland Office.Google Scholar
  22. Glonti, G. (2011) Crime and Security Survey Georgia. 2011, final report, Tbilisi: GORBI.Google Scholar
  23. Hamai, K. and Ellis, T. (2006) ‘Crime and criminal justice in modern Japan: From re-integrative shaming to popular punitivism’. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 34, pp.157–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haymoz S., Aebi M.F., Killias M., Lamon P.2009 Comparisons of crime data based on general population surveys with criminal statistics in Switzerland. In: Robert P. (eds.) Comparing Crime Data in Europe: Official Crime Statistics and Survey Based Data. Criminologische Studies, VUBPRESS Brussels Univ. Press, Brussels, pp. 127–140.Google Scholar
  25. Hope, T. (2007) Conceptualising the trend in burglary in England and Wales. Paper presented at the Colloquium on Property Crime, CRIMPREV, Brussels, 7–8 February 2007.Google Scholar
  26. Lagrange, H., Pottier, M-L., Zauberman, R., Robert, P. (2004) ‘Enquêtes de victimation et statistiques de police: les difficultés d’une comparaison’. Déviance et Société, 28, pp.285–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lynch, J.P. (1996) ‘Problems and promise of victimization surveys for cross-national research’. Crime and Justice, 34, pp.229–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McDowall, D. and C. Loftin (2007) ‘What is convergence and what do we know about it?’ In J. Lynch and L. Addington (eds) Understanding Crime Statistics: Revisiting the Divergence of the NCVS and UCR. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Meuldijk, D. (2010) Some first observations, ICVS 2010. Expert meeting, co-organised by NICIS and the Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Law, 13 October 2010, Freiburg.Google Scholar
  30. Pepper, J., Petrie, C. and Sullivan, S. (2010) ‘Measurement Error in Criminal Justice Data’. Handbook of Quantitative Criminology, 3, pp.353–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rosenfeld, R. (2007) ‘Explaining the Divergence Between UCR and NCVS Aggravated Assault Trends’. In Understanding Crime Statistics: Revisiting the Divergence of the NCVS and UCR, Lynch, J. and Addington, L. (eds) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Stepherd, J. and Sivarajasingam, V. (2005) Injury research explains conflicting violence trends. In www.injuryprevention.com.Google Scholar
  33. Tseloni, A., Mailley, J., Farrell, G. and Tilley, N. (2010) ‘The international crime drop: Trends and variations’. European Journal of Criminology, 7, pp.375–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. van Steden, R. and Sarre, R. (2007) ‘The growth of private security: trends in the European Union’. Security Journal, 20(3), pp.222–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Walker, A., Flatley, J., Kershaw, C. and Moon, D. (2009) Crime in England and Wales 2008/2009: Findings from the British Crime Survey and police recorded crime, Volume 1. Home Office Statistical Office, July 2009.Google Scholar
  36. Wittebrood, K. en Nieuwbeerta, P. (2006) ‘Een kwart eeuw stijging in geregis-treerde criminaliteit: Vooral meer registratie, nauwelijks meer criminaliteit’. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, 48, pp. 227–242.Google Scholar
  37. Wittebrood, K. (2006) Slachtoffers van criminaliteit. Feiten en achtergronden. Den Haag: SCP.Google Scholar
  38. Zauberman, R., Robert, P., Nevanen, S. and Didier, E. (2009) ‘L’acteur et la mesure. Le comptage de la délinquance entre données administratives et enquêtes’. Revue française de sociologie, 50, pp.31–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Jan van Dijk and Andromachi Tseloni 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan van Dijk
  • Andromachi Tseloni

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations