Authoritarianism, Anti-imperialism, and Intervention: The Precariousness of the Middle Ground

  • Chris Brown
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in International Relations book series (PSIR)

Abstract

At a high level of generality, the notion that it is valuable to search for the middle ground has a long and distinguished history. For Aristotle, the so-called ‘golden mean’ is the desirable middle way between two extremes (thus, he would argue, courage is the opposite both of cowardice and of recklessness); and similar ideas can be found in other traditions. The idea of the middle ground can also be fruitful at the more mundane level of political and social systems—thus, social democracy clearly occupies a kind of middle ground between unfettered capitalism and state socialism. In the realm of international theory, it is also sometimes possible to identify a middle way; members of the English School (ES) believe that their key organizing concept, International Society, can be seen as the product of two oppositions—between the notions of an international system and an international community, although whether this particular middle way is desirable or not is contested (Brown 1995, 2010).

Keywords

Political Theory Middle Ground Global Justice English School International Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barber, Benjamin (2007) ‘Review of William Connolly’, Pluralism in Ethics, 117, 4, pp. 747–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barry, Brian (1973) The Liberal Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bellamy, Alex (2009) The Responsibility to Protect. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beitz, Charles (1979/1999) Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beitz, Charles (1983) ‘Cosmopolitan Ideas and National Sentiment’, Journal of Philosophy, 80, pp. 591–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beitz, Charles (2009) The Idea of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, Chris (1995) ‘International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way’, Review of International Studies, 21, 2, pp. 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, Chris (2006) ‘From International to Global Justice’? in J. Dryzek, B. Honig and A. Phillips (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, Chris (2010) Practical Judgement and International Political Theory: Selected Essays. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Bull, Hedley (1977) The Anarchical Society. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bull, Hedley (1984) Justice in International Relations. The Hagey Lectures, Waterloo: University of Waterloo.Google Scholar
  12. Butterfield, Herbert and Martin Wight (eds.) (1966) Diplomatic Investigations. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  13. Caney, Simon (2006) Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Caney, Simon, Peter Jones and David George (eds.) (1996) National Rights, International Obligations. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  15. Cohen, Nick (2007) What’s Left. London: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  16. Connolly, William (1999) Why I am Not a Secularist. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  17. Connolly, William (2005) Pluralism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dahl, Robert (1961) ‘The Behavioural Approach in Political Science: Epitaph for a Monument to a Successful Protest’, American Political Science Review, 55, pp. 763–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Doyle, Michael (1983) ‘Kant, Liberal Legacies and Foreign Affairs’, Parts I & II, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 12, pp. 205–235, 323–353.Google Scholar
  20. Dunne, Tim (1998) Inventing International Society. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elshtain, Jean Bethke (2003) Just War Against Terror. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  22. European Journal of Political Theory (2010) Special Issue on ‘Realism and Political Theory’ 9, 4, pp. 379–512.Google Scholar
  23. Frost, Mervyn (1986) Towards a Normative Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Geras, Norman (2009) ‘Brian Barry: 1936–2009’, Normblog, March 11, 2009.Google Scholar
  25. Geuss, Raymond (2008) Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harris, Nigel (1990) The End of the Third World. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  27. Hitchens, Christopher (2011) Arguably. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  28. Jackson, Robert (2000) The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Keohane, Robert O. (ed.) (1986) Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Keohane, Robert O (1989) ‘International Relations Theory: Contributions of a Feminist Standpoint’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 18, 2, pp. 245–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Linklater, Andrew (1982) Men and Citizens in the Theory of International Relations. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McIntyre. Alasdair (1981) After Virtue. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
  33. McEwan, Ian (2010) Solar. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
  34. Nardin, Terry (1983) Law, Morality and the Relations of States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  35. O’Neill, Onora (1986) Faces of Hunger. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  36. Pogge, Thomas (2007) World Poverty and Human Rights. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  37. Rawls, John (1971) A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Rawls, John (1999) The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Roth, Kenneth (2004) ‘War in Iraq: Not a Humanitarian Intervention’, Human Rights Watch World Report http://www.hrw.orghttp:///wr2k4/3.htmGoogle Scholar
  40. Sandel, Michael (1982) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Taylor, Charles (1975) Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Taylor, Charles (1991) The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Walzer, Michael (1977) Just and Unjust Wars. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  44. Walzer, Michael (1995) ‘The Politics of Rescue’, Dissent (Winter), pp. 35–41.Google Scholar
  45. Walzer, Michael (2007) Thinking Politically: Essays in Political Theory, D. Miller (ed.) New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Walzer, Michael (2011) ‘The Case Against Our Attack on Libya’, The New Republic 20 March, http://www.tnr.comhttp:///article/world/85509/the-case-againstour-attack-libya#, Accessed 28 July 2013.Google Scholar
  47. Wheeler, Nicholas J. (1992) ‘Pluralist and Solidarist Conceptions of International Society’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 21, pp.63–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wheeler (2000) Saving Strangers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Williams, Bernard (2007) In the Beginning Was the Deed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Williams, Michael C. (ed.) (2007) Realism Reconsidered: The Legacy of Hans Morgenthau in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Youtube (2003) ‘Conservatives Protest at a Peace Rally in SF’, Accessed 19 July 2010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chris Brown 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Brown

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations