Germans within the British Army

  • Mark Wishon
Part of the War, Culture and Society, 1750–1850 book series (WCS)

Abstract

In the last three chapters we have examined the similarities and differences between British soldiers and their German counterparts, be they allies in a coalition army, or as auxiliaries to Britain’s armed forces. In this and the next chapter, we will turn to those German soldiers who served formally within the British Army from the mid-eighteenth to early-nineteenth centuries, focusing on the staggered progression towards direct integration into the army. Rather than following the template adhered to for the last three chapters, this chapter will survey the history of Germans within the British Army in this period, and rather than stressing the perceptions towards fellow-soldiers (in part because so few exist), the emphasis will be placed on some of the key themes in their recruitment and integration, and what made service in the British Army so desirable or undesirable. This chapter will then be followed by a case study of one particular entity that achieved a degree of structural and social integration that no previous foreign corps had attained — be they Dutch, Huguenot or German. That this force, the King’s German Legion, should come into being at the end of the period under examination is no coincidence as those factors that spurred German assimilation throughout this era were particularly acute in the quarter century of conflict with Republican and Imperial France.

Keywords

German State Royal Family Foreign Corps British Army German Army 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Kenneth Ferguson, ‘The Organization of King William’s Army in Ireland, 1689–92’, Irish Sword, XVIII(70) (1990), pp. 68–9.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Matthew H. Glozier, The Huguenots of William of Orange and the Glorious ‘Revolution’ of 1688 (Brighton: Sussex Academic Press, 2002), p. 136.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    For an insightful history of the 60th Regiment see: Alexander Campbell, The Royal American Regiment: An Atlantic History in Microcosm, 1756–1762 (Norman, Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press, 2010).Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    Such foreign contingents were only allowed to serve in the American Colonies and the Caribbean until the 1804 Act, permitting as many as 10,000 foreign men to serve in Britain. Lewis Butler, The Annals of the King’s Royal Rifle Corps: Volume I. ‘The Royal Americans’ (London: Smith & Elder, 1913), p. 208Google Scholar
  5. Richard Holmes, Redcoat: The British Soldier in the Age of Horse and Musket (London: Harper Collins: 2002), p. 329.Google Scholar
  6. 12.
    For more on these issues, see, Peter Wilson, ‘The Politics of Military Recruitment in Eighteenth-Century Germany’, English Historical Review, (472) (June 2002), p. 539.Google Scholar
  7. 15.
    See: Charles Oman, Wellington’s Army, 1809–1814 (London: Greenhill Books, 1986), p. 227Google Scholar
  8. Charles Boutflower, The Journal of an Army Surgeon Duringthe Peninsular War (Staplehurst: Spellmount, 1997), p. 53.Google Scholar
  9. 16.
    For a fascinating and highly readable monograph on the many propagandized retellings of Major von Schill’s life, see: Sam Mustafa, The Long Ride of Major von Schill: A Journey Through German History and Memory (Plymouth: Rowan & Littlefield, 2008)Google Scholar
  10. See also: Anon, Wider Napoleon! Ein Deutsches Reiterleben 1806–1815, herausgegeben von Friedrich M. Kircheisen (Stuttgart: Robert Luß, 1911), esp. vol. I.Google Scholar
  11. 19.
    The King’s German Legion have received by far the most attention of all Germans within the British Army, with the most noteworthy and significant contributions to their history from North Ludlow Beamish, History of the King’s German Legion (London: Thomas and William Boone, 1837 (1997))Google Scholar
  12. Adolf Pfannkuche, Die Königlich Deutsche Legion 1803–1816 (Hannover: Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1926)Google Scholar
  13. Anthony Brett-James, Life in Wellington’s Army (London: George Allen, 1972)Google Scholar
  14. Roger Edward Francis Guilford North, ‘The Raising and Organizing of the King’s German Legion’, JSAHR, 39 (1961), pp. 168–84Google Scholar
  15. Bernhard Heinrich Schwertfeger, Geschichte der königlich deutschen Legion, 1803–1816 (Hanover and Leipzig: Hahn’sche Buchhandlung, 1907).Google Scholar
  16. 20.
    C.T. Atkinson, ‘Hanoverian Soldiers in Gibraltar’, United Service Magazine, 180 (1919), p. 25.Google Scholar
  17. 23.
    The growth of Bexhill from a village to a town at the beginning of the nineteenth century is credited to the presence of the Legion’s headquarters, where a number of men were continuously stationed. For an account of the headquarters, see: Emanuel Biedermann, Von Malta Bis Waterloo: erinnerungen Aus den Kriegen gegen Napoleon I (Bern: Hallwag, 1941), p. 134.Google Scholar
  18. 24.
    For the letters of a soldier serving in these newly formed regiments, see: Joachim Kannicht, Mit der hanseatischen Legion gegen Napoleon: Erfahrungen eines jungen Studenten 1813–1816 (Aachen: Helios, 2008).Google Scholar
  19. 25.
    W.B. Tyler, ‘The British German Legion — 1854–1862’, JSAHR, 54 (1976), pp. 14–29.Google Scholar
  20. 36.
    Harding, Hanover and the British Empire, pp. 255–8. For a collection of William Cobbett’s arguments against this favouritism, see: Daniel Green, The Great Cobbett: The Noblest Agitator (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1983), pp. 345–8, 377.Google Scholar
  21. 40.
    For the 60th’s focus on frontier warfare: see A.J. Barker, Redcoats (London: Gordon Cremonesi, 1976), p. 145.Google Scholar
  22. 42.
    Gleig, Hussar, p. 35; René Chartrand, Émigré and Foreign Troops in British Service (I) 1793–1802 (Oxford: Osprey, 1999).Google Scholar
  23. 44.
    Conway, War of American Independence, p. 246; Lieut.-Col. Sir Frederick von Arentschildt, Instructions for Officers and Non-Commissioned Officers of Cavalry On Outpost Duty (London: Parker Furnival and Parker, 18Google Scholar
  24. 45.
    Anon, Memoirs of A Sergeant: The 43rd Light Infantry During the Peninsular War (Gloucestershire: Nonsuch, 2005).Google Scholar
  25. See also: Christopher Hibbert (ed.), A Soldier of the Seventy-First: The Journal of a Soldier of the Highland Light Infantry 1806–1815 (London: Leo Cooper, 1975), p. 33.Google Scholar
  26. 46.
    Captain George Bent, ‘Major Morris Bent, South Staffordshire Regiment, A “Royal American”’, Journal for the Society of Army Historical Research, JSAHR, 1 (1921), p. 98.Google Scholar
  27. 59.
    It should be noted that the validity of this memoir is somewhat in doubt. Anon, Adventures of a Young Rifleman in the French and English Armies, During the War in Spain and Portugal, From 1806 to 1916 (London: Henry Colburn, 1826), pp. 297–8.Google Scholar
  28. 68.
    In Canada during the Seven Years War, German soldiers who had been tricked into French service were quick to desert to the British. See: John Knox, An Historical Journal of the Campaigns in North America for the Years 1757, 1758, 1759 and 1760, edited by Sir Arthur Doughty (Toronto, ON: Champlain Society, 1914–16), vol. I, pp. 246, 323.Google Scholar
  29. 69.
    Thomas Agostini, ‘“Deserted his Majesty’s Service”, Military Runaways, the Press, and the Problem of Desertion in the Seven Years War’, Journal of Social History, 40(4) (2007), p. 967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 70.
    For Montesquieu’s opinions, see: Michael Rapport, ‘“The Germans are Hydrophobes”’: Germany and the Germans in the Shaping of French Identity’, in Alan Forrest and Peter H. Wilson, The Bee and Eagle (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2009), pp. 234–55.Google Scholar
  31. 74.
    Friedrich Lindau, Erinnerungen Eines Soldaten aus den Feldzügen der königlichdeutschen Legion (Hameln: Niemeyer, 1846), p. 8.Google Scholar
  32. 77.
    Christopher Hibbert (ed.), The Wheatley Diary: A Journal and Sketch-Book Kept During the Peninsular War and the Waterloo Campaign, 2nd ed. (Gloucestershire: Windrush Press, 1997), p. 8.Google Scholar
  33. 80.
    Peter Way, ‘Class and the Common Soldier in the Seven Years’ War’, Labor History, 44(4) (2003), p. 476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. See also: Thomas Agostini, ‘“Deserted his Majesty’s Service”, Military Runaways, the Press, and the Problem of Desertion in the Seven Years War’, Journal of Social History, 40(4) (2007), pp. 957–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 82.
    Victor Sutcliffe, Regiments of the British Army: Part 1 Infantry (East Rudham: Mulberry Coach House, 2007), p. 329.Google Scholar
  36. 88.
    Sir Augustus Simon Frazer, Letters of Colonel Sir Augustus Simon Frazer, K.C.B., edited by Major-General Edward Sabine (East Sussex: Naval Military Press, 2001), p. 263.Google Scholar
  37. 95.
    Adolf Pfannkuche, Die Königlich Deutsche Legion 1803–1816 (Hannover: Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1926), p. 18.Google Scholar
  38. 97.
    John Spencer Cooper, Rough Notes of Seven Campaigns in Portugal, Spain, France and America During the Years 1809–1815 (Staplehurst: Spellmount, 1996), pp. 14, 20.Google Scholar
  39. 100.
    Linda Colley, Captives: Britain, Empire, and the World, 1600–1815 (New York: Anchor Books, 2002), pp. 328–32.Google Scholar
  40. 101.
    Quoted in Peter Way, ‘Soldiers of Misfortune: New England Regulars and the Fall of Oswego’, Massachusetts Historical Review, 3 (2001), p. 77.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mark Wishon 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Wishon
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations