Redundancies in External Relationships of Multinational Corporations — A Firm-Level Conceptual Model

  • Phillip C. Nell
  • Ulf Andersson
  • Björn Ambos
Chapter
Part of the The Academy of International Business book series

Abstract

The conceptualization of the multinational corporation (MNC) as a differentiated network suggests that the subsidiaries’ level of embeddedness in their local environment is crucial, as it is the basis for subsidiary-specific advantages and entrepreneur ship (Andersson et al., 2002; Frost, 2001). In addition to possessing important resources, the subsidiaries of a differentiated MNC are conceptualized as being relatively autonomous and powerful, striving at least in part for their own goals (Birkinshaw, 1997; Hedlund, 1986; Nohria and Ghoshal, 1997; Rugman and Verbeke, 2001). The headquarters’ (HQ’s) role is to design differentiated coordination and control mechanisms to ensure that the MNC acts as a differentiated but integrated network of units (Nohria and Ghoshal, 1997). However, this HQ role is very difficult to fulfil if not contradictory. Especially critical is the underlying assumption that HQs have knowledge about a large variety of subsidiary contexts, and that they are able to and possess the power to orchestrate and manage the differentiated network (Björkman and Forsgren, 2000; Holm et al., 1995).

Keywords

Foreign Direct Investment Multinational Corporation Strategic Management Journal Foreign Subsidiary International Business Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. U. Andersson, I. Björkman and M. Forsgren, ‘Managing subsidiary knowledge creation: the effect of control mechanisms on subsidiary local embeddedness’, International Business Review, 14(5) (2005) 521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. U. Andersson and M. Forsgren, ‘subsidiary embeddedness and control in the multinational corporation’, International Business Review, 5(5) (1996) 487–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. U. Andersson, M. Forsgren and U. Holm, ‘The strategic impact of external networks: subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation’, Strategic Management Journal, 23(11) (2002) 979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. U. Andersson, M. Forsgren and U. Holm, ‘Balancing subsidiary influence in the federative MNC: a business network view’, Journal of International Business Studies, 38(5) (2007) 802–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. K. Asakawa, ‘The Multinational Tension in R&D Internationalization: Strategic Linkage Mechanisms of Distant Contextual Knowledge in Japanese Multinational Companies’, INSEAD. Fontainebleau, INSEAD (1996).Google Scholar
  6. K. Asakawa, ‘Organizational tension in international R&D management: the case of Japanese firms’, Research Policy, 30(5) (2001) 735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. B. R. Baliga and A. M. Jaeger, ‘Multinational corporations: control systems and delegation issues’, Journal of International Business Studies, 15(2) (1984) 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. C. M. Beckman, P. R. Haunschild and D. J. Phillips, ‘Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection’, Organization Science, 15(3) (2004) 259–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. J. Birkinshaw, ‘Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: the characteristics of subsidiary initiatives’, Strategic Management Journal, 18(3) (1997) 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. J. Birkinshaw and M. Lingblad, ‘Intrafirm competition and charter evolution in the multi-business firm’, Organization Science, 16(6) (2005) 674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. J. Birkinshaw, O. Toulan and D. Arnold, ‘Global account management in multinational corporations: theory and evidence’, Journal of International Business Studies, 32(2) (2001) 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. I. Björkman and M. Forsgren, ‘Nordic international business research’, International Studies of Management & Organization, 30(1) (2000) 6.Google Scholar
  13. D. M. Boehe, ‘Product development in MNC subsidiaries: local linkages and global interde-pendencies’, Journal of International Management, 13(4) (2007) 488–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. C. Bouquet and J. Birkinshaw, ‘Weight versus voice: how foreign subsidiaries gain attention from corporate headquarters’, Academy of Management Journal, 51(3) (2008) 577–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. B. K. Boyd and J. Fulk, ‘Executive scanning and perceived uncertainty: a multidimensional model’, Journal of Management, 22(1) (1996) 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. D.J. Brass and M. E. Burkhardt, ‘Potential power and power use: an investigation of structure and behavior’, Academy of Management Journal, 36(3) (1993) 441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. D.J. Brass, K. D. Butterfield and B. C. Skaggs, ‘Relationships and unethical behavior: a social network perspective’, Academy of Management Review, 23(1) (1998) 14.Google Scholar
  18. R. S. Burt, Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
  19. R. E. Caves and M. E. Porter, ‘Market structure, oligopoly, and stability of market shares’, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 29(1) (1978) 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. T.-J. Chen, H. Chen and Y.-H. Ku, ‘Foreign direct investment and local linkages’, Journal of International Business Studies, 35(4) (2004) 320–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. K. S. Cook and R. M. Emerson, ‘Power, equity and commitment in exchange networks’, American Sociological Review, 43(5) (1978) 712–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. M. T. Dacin, M. J. Ventresca and B. D. Beal, ‘The embeddedness of organizations: dialogue & directions’, Journal of Management, 25(3) (1999) 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. D. H. Doty, W. H. Glick and G. P. Huber, ‘Fit, equifinality, and organizational effectiveness: a test’, Academy of Management Journal, 36(6) (1993) 1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. R. Drazin and A. H. Van de Ven, ‘Alternative forms of fit in contingency theory’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(4) (1985) 514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. A. Edström and J. R. Galbraith, ‘Transfer of managers as a coordination and control strategy in multinational organizations’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(2) (1977) 248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. M. Forsgren, ‘The Use of Network Theory in MNC Research’, in V. Mahnke and T. Pedersen (eds), Knowledge Flows, Governance and the Multinational Enterprise — Frontiers in International Management Research, (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2004), pp. 18–37.Google Scholar
  27. M. Forsgren, U. Holm and J. Johanson, The Embedded Multinational-A Business Network View, (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. N. J. Foss and T. Pedersen, ‘Transferring knowledge in MNCs: the role of sources of subsidiary knowledge and organizational context’, Journal of International Management, 8(1) (2002) 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. T. S. Frost, ‘The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries’innovations’, Strategic Management Journal, 22(2) (2001) 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. S. Ghoshal and C. Bartlett, ‘The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network’, Academy of Management Review, 15(4) (1990) 603–25.Google Scholar
  31. S. Ghoshal and N. Nohria, ‘Internal differentiation within multinational corporations’, Strategic Management Journal, 10(4) (1989) 323–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. M. Granovetter, ‘Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology, 91(3) (1985) 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. R. Gulati, ‘Alliances and networks’, Strategic Management Journal, 19(4) (1998) 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. L. Hakansson and R. Nobel, ‘Organizational characteristics and reverse technology transfer’, Management International Review, 41(4) (2001) 395–420.Google Scholar
  35. A. Halinen and J.-A. Törnroos, ‘The role of embeddedness in the evolution of business networks’, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 14(3) (1998) 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. M. T. Hansen, ‘The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1) (1999) 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. G. Hedlund, ‘The role of foreign subsidiaries in strategic decision-making in Swedish multinational corporations’, Strategic Management Journal, 1(1) (1980) 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. G. Hedlund, ‘The hypermodern MNC — a heterarchy?’, Human Resource Management, 25(1) (1986) 9–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. K. Hewett, M. S. Roth and K. Roth, ‘Conditions influencing headquarters and foreign subsidiary roles in marketing activities and their effects on performance’, Journal of International Business Studies, 34(6) (2003) 567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. U. Holm, C. Holmström and D. Sharma, ‘Competence development through business relationships or competitive environment? — subsidiary impact on MNC competitive advantage’, Management International Review (MIR), 45(2) (2005) 197.Google Scholar
  41. U. Holm, J. Johanson and P. Thilenius, ‘Headquarters’ knowledge of subsidiary network contexts in the multinational corporation’, International Studies of Management & Organization, 25(12) (1995) 97–120.Google Scholar
  42. C. L. Holmström, ‘Managing the Transfer of Externally Embedded Subsidiary Knowledge: The Role of Headquarters Control Mechanisms’, in U. Andersson and U. Holm (eds), Managing the Contemporary Multinational: The Role of Headquarters, (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2010), pp. 231–53.Google Scholar
  43. B. J. Jaworski and A. K. Kohli, ‘Market orientation: antecedents and consequences’, Journal of Marketing, 57(3) (1993) 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. B. R. Koka, R. Madhavan and J. E. Prescott, ‘The evolution of interfirm networks: environmental effects on patterns of network change’, The Academy of Management Review, 31(3) (2006) 721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. P. J. Lane and M. Lubatkin, ‘Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning’, Strategic Management Journal, 19(5) (1998) 461–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Y. Luo, ‘Organizational dynamics and global integration: a perspective from subsidiary managers’, Journal of International Management, 8(2) (2002) 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Y. Luo, ‘Industrial dynamics and managerial networking in an emerging market: the case of China’, Strategic Management Journal, 24(13) (2003) 1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. J. I. Martinez and J. C. Jarillo, ‘The evolution of research on coordination mechanisms in multinational corporations’, Journal of International Business Studies, 20(3) (1989) 489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. A. Menon, B. J. Jaworski and A. K. Kohli, ‘Product quality: impact of interdepartmental interactions’, Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 25(3) (1997) 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. M. S. Mizruchi and J. Galaskiewicz, ‘Networks of Interorganizational Relations’, in S. Wasserman and J. Galaskiewicz (eds), Advances in Social Network Analysis: Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994), pp. 230–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. S. C. Mu, D. R. Gnyawali and D. E. Hatfield, ‘Foreign subsidiaries’ learning from local environments: an empirical test’, Management International Review (MIR), 47(1) (2007) 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. R. Mudambi and P. Navarra, ‘Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows, subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs’, Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5) (2004) 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. R. Narula and A. Zanfei, ‘Globalisation of Innovation: The Role of Multinational Enterprises’, in J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery and R. Nelson (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation, (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), pp. 318–45.Google Scholar
  54. R. Nobel and J. Birkinshaw, ‘Innovation in multinational corporations: control and communication patterns in international R&D operations’, Strategic Management Journal, 19(5) (1998) 479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. N. Nohria and S. Ghoshal, ‘Differentiated fit and shared values: alternatives for managing headquarters-subsidiary relations’, Strategic Management Journal, 15(6) (1994) 491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. P. C. Nell, B. Ambos and B.B. Schlegelmilch, ‘The MNC as an externally embedded organization: An investigation of embeddedness overlap in local subsidiary networks’, Journal of World Business, 46(4) (2011) 497–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. N. Nohria and S. Ghoshal, The Differentiated Network. Organizing Multinationals for Value Creation, (San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 1997).Google Scholar
  58. W. G. Ouchi and M. A. Maguire, ‘Organizational control — two functions’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 20(4) (1975) 559–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. R. Pearce and M. Papanastassiou, ‘Global-Innovation Strategies of MNEs and European Integration: The Role of Regional R&D Facilities’, in R. Pearce (Ed.), Global Competition and Technology, (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1997), pp. 123–52.Google Scholar
  60. J. Pfeffer and G. R. Salancik, The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, (New York: Harper & Row, 1978).Google Scholar
  61. M. E. Porter, Competitive Strategy, (New York: The Free Press, 1980).Google Scholar
  62. W. W. Powell, K. W. Koput and L. Smith-Doen, ‘Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1) (1996) 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. C. K. Prahalad and R. Bettis, ‘The dominant logic: retrospective and extension’, Strategic Management Journal, 16(1) (1995) 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. D. S. Pugh, D.J. Hickson, C. R. Hinings and C. Turner, ‘Dimensions of organization structure’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 13(1) (1968) 65–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. T. G. Rawski, ‘Chinese industrial reform: accomplishments, prospects and implications’, American Economic Review, 84(2) (1994) 271–75.Google Scholar
  66. A. M. Rugman and A. Verbeke, ‘subsidiary-specific advantages in multinational enterprises’, Strategic Management Journal, 22(3) (2001) 237–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. S. Schmid and A. Schurig, ‘The development of critical capabilities in foreign subsidiaries: disentangling the role of the subsidiary’s business network’, International Business Review, 12(6) (2003) 755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. J. D. Thompson, Organizations in Action, (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967).Google Scholar
  69. W. Tsai, ‘social capital, strategic relatedness and the formation of intraorganizational linkages’, Strategic Management Journal, 21(9) (2000) 925–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. W. Tsai and S. Ghoshal, ‘social capital and value creation: the role of intrafirm networks’, Academy of Management Journal, 41(4) (1998) 464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. O. E. Williamson, Markets ana Hierarchies — Analysis and Antitrust Implications: A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization, (New York: The Free Press, 1975).Google Scholar
  72. M. Yamin and M. Forsgren, ‘Hymer’s analysis of the multinational organization: power retention and the demise of the federative MNE’, International Business Review, 15(2) (2006) 166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Phillip C. Nell, Ulf Andersson and Björn Ambos 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Phillip C. Nell
    • 1
  • Ulf Andersson
    • 1
  • Björn Ambos
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Strategic Management and GlobalizationCopenhagen Business SchoolDenmark
  2. 2.Institute of ManagementUniversity of St. GallenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations