“Something Old, Something New … ”: WikiLeaks and the Collaborating Newspapers — Exploring the Limits of Conjoint Approaches to Political Exposure

  • Hopeton S. Dunn
Chapter

Abstract

New media are now contributing to the democratization of access to information, its creation, and its consumption. This has effectively altered the coveted gatekeeping and public agenda setting roles usually ascribed to traditional media. At the same time, a new relationship is emerging between these Web 2.0 media platforms and their traditional media counterparts, especially print media. While newspapers sometimes rely on less encumbered online sources for cutting-edge news exposés, the new-media entities also often count on the long-established traditional media institutions to provide credibility and critical analysis of new media’s Web-generated news content. It is this notion of a conjoint approach to political exposure that was evident in the WikiLeaks engagement of and association with traditional news entities such as the New York Times, the Guardian, Der Spiegel, the Jamaica Gleaner, and other newspapers as outlets for its classified secret content. The chapter argues that this collaboration, although an uneasy marriage of necessity, may eventually settle into a stable cohabitation of the public sphere and will help to redefine the character of media and the meaning of “news.”

Keywords

Public Sphere Agenda Setting Traditional Medium Network Society Content Creation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Althaus, S. and Tewksbury D. (2000). Agenda Setting and the “new” News: Patterns of Issue Importance Among Readers of the Paper and Online Versions of the New York Times, Communications Research 29 (2), 180–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bueti, C. and Obiso, M. (2007). Content Delivery Platforms in a Converging World. Retrieved June 30, 2012 from http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/stn/digital-content/Presentations/Day1/Session4/21%20June-Bueti-Obiso.pdfGoogle Scholar
  3. Cammaerts, B. and Audenhove, L. (2005). Online Political Debate, Unbounded Citizenship, and the Problematic Nature of a Transnational Public Sphere. Political Communication 22, 179–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castells, M. (2000). The Rise of Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell PublishersGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, B. (1963). The Press and Poreign Policy. Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  6. Dahlgren, P. (2000). The Internet and the Democratization of Civic Culture. Journal of Political Communication 17, 335–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dearing, J. W. and Rogers, E. M. (1966). Agenda Setting. London: SageGoogle Scholar
  8. Dunn, H. (2008). Regulating the Changing Face of Electronic Media in Jamaica. Retrieved June 25, 2012 from http://www.broadcastingcommission.org/speeches_and_presentations#speeches-and-presentationsGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellison, S. (February 11, 2011). The Man Who Spilled the secrets. Retrieved September 10, 2012 from http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2011/02/the-guardian-201102Google Scholar
  10. Gleaner Newspaper Online. (July 13, 2011). WikiLeaks: what We Published. Retrieved August 15, 2012 from http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20110713/lead/lead6.htmlGoogle Scholar
  11. Gleaner Newspaper Online. (May 22, 2011). Wikileaks Secrets! Busted. Retrieved August 15, 2012 from http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20110522/lead/lead1.htmlGoogle Scholar
  12. Hardey, M. (2007). The City in the Age of Web 2.0: A New Synergistic Relationship between Place and People. Information, Communication, & Society 10 (6), 867–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heald, E. (2012). The Impact of WikiLeaks on Professional Media. Retrieved June 20, 2012 from http://www.editorsweblog.org/2012/02/16/the-impact-of-WikiLeaks-on-professional-mediaGoogle Scholar
  14. Howard, P. (2011). Castells and the Media. United Kingdom: Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  15. Innis, H. A. (1951). The Bias of Communication. Toronto: University of Toronto PressGoogle Scholar
  16. Keller, Bill. (2011, January 26). Dealing with Assange and the WikiLeaks Secrets. The New York Times Google Scholar
  17. Lagerkvist, A. (2009). Transitional Times: “New Media”, Novel Histories and Trajectories. Nordicom Review30(1), 3–18Google Scholar
  18. Leigh, D. and Harding, L. (2011). WikiLeaks. Inside Julian Assange’s War on Secrecy. Great Britain: Guardian BooksGoogle Scholar
  19. Jenkins, H. (2009). Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. Chicago: MacArthur FoundationGoogle Scholar
  20. McCombs, M. E., and Shaw, D. L. (1972). The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. Public Opinion Quarterly 36, 176–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McLuhan, M. (1962). The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto PressGoogle Scholar
  22. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: MentorGoogle Scholar
  23. Meraz, S. (2009). Is there an Elite Hold? Traditional Media to Social Media Agenda Setting Influence in Blog Networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14, 682–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ong, W. (1982). Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. New York: MethuenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Postman, N. (1985). Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business. New York: PenguinGoogle Scholar
  26. Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. New York: KnopfGoogle Scholar
  27. Press, A. L., Williams, Bruce, A. (2010). The New Media Environment: An Introduction. Oxford: Wiley-BlackwellGoogle Scholar
  28. Russell, A. (2011). Networked: A contemporary History of News in Transition. Polity PressGoogle Scholar
  29. Shrivastava, K. M. (1998). Media Towards 21st Century. New Delhi India: Sterling Publishers Private LtdGoogle Scholar
  30. Toffler, A. (1980). The Third Wave. New York: Bantam BooksGoogle Scholar
  31. US Government. (2010). Espionage Act and the Legal and Constitutional Issues Raised by WikiLeaks. Hearings before the Committee of the Judiciary House of Representatives. One Hundred Eleventh Congress. Second Session. December 2010. Retrieved August 29, 2012 from http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/printers/111th/111-160_63081.PDFGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Hopeton S. Dunn 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hopeton S. Dunn

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations