Abstract

A container for the body, the skin is the largest sensory organ and therefore the most open to touch. It forms a comparatively vast, haptic boundary between body and world, putting the body in touch with the world as well as putting the body in touch with itself: the skin feels and communicates pain, pleasure, itch, burn, shiver, and a plethora of other sensations. Steven Connor, drawing on Michel Serres, views skin not merely as a surface, but as a milieu: a meeting point where “world and body touch, defining their common border.” 1 The skin is both physiological—a sensory apparatus—and imaginary: a containing border, which demarcates inner and outer, “I” and “you.” In this way, we have both an inner and an outer skin—an outer skin of the body and an inner one of the mind, an imaginary container for selfhood.

Keywords

Television Screen External Space Outer Skin Dark Space Actual Mother 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Steven Connor, The Book of Skin ( New York: Cornell, 2003 ), 28–29.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jean-Luc Nancy, Corpus , trans. Richard A. Rand (New York: Fordham University Press, 2008), 15. emphasis in original.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    See Freud, The Ego and the Id, trans. Joan Riviere ( London: Hogarth, 1927 ).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Didier Anzieu, Skin Ego , trans. C. Turner (New Haven: Yale, 1989), 101, emphasis in original.Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    James Knowlson, Damned to Fame ( London: Bloomsbury, 1996 ), 616.Google Scholar
  6. 9.
    Mary Bryden, Women in Samuel Beckett’s Prose and Drama: Her Own Other ( Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1993 ), 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 11.
    See also Jennifer Jeffers, Beckett’s Masculinity ( New York: Palgrave, 2009 ).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 12.
    Anna McMullan, “From Matron to Matrix: Gender, Authority and (Dis) embodiment in Beckett’s Theater,” in Women in Irish Drama: A Century of Authorship and Representation, ed. Melissa Sihra (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007 ), 98.Google Scholar
  9. 14.
    See Minako Okamuro, “… but the clouds… and a Yeatsian Phantasmagoria,” SBTA 19 (2006).Google Scholar
  10. 16.
    Jonathan Bignell, Beckett on Screen: The Television Plays ( Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2009 ), 145–146.Google Scholar
  11. 19.
    See Laura Marks, The Skin of the Film ( Durham: Duke University Press, 2000 ).Google Scholar
  12. 20.
    Gilles Deleuze, “The Exhausted,” trans. Christian Kerslake, Parallax 3 (1996): 127.Google Scholar
  13. 21.
    Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Colin Smyth (London: Routledge, 2002 ), 283.Google Scholar
  14. 24.
    Samuel Beckett, Company (London: Calder, 1984 ), 7.Google Scholar
  15. 26.
    Anna McMullan, Performing Embodiment in the Work of Samuel Beckett ( New York: Routledge, 2010 ), 88.Google Scholar
  16. 28.
    William Gruber, “Empire of Light: Luminosity of Space in Beckett’s Theater,” in Samuel Beckett: A Casebook, ed. Jennifer Jeffers (New York and London: Garland, 1998 ), 217.Google Scholar
  17. 30.
    Anna McMullan, Theatre on Trial: Samuel Beckett’s Later Drama ( London: Routledge, 1993 ), 110.Google Scholar
  18. 31.
    Jean-Luc Nancy, Listening, trans. Charlotte Mandell (New York: Fordham University Press, 2007 ), 17.Google Scholar
  19. 32.
    Mladen Dolar, “The Object Voice,” in Gaze and Voice as Love Objects, ed. Renata Salecl and Slovoj Žiž ek (Durham and London: Duke University Press, 1996 ), 13.Google Scholar
  20. 33.
    Julia Kristeva, The Kristeva Reader, ed. Toril Moi (Oxford: Blackwell, 1986 ), 94–95.Google Scholar
  21. 39.
    Elin Diamond, “Feminist Readings of Beckett,” in Palgrave Advances in Beckett Studies ed. by Lois Oppenheim (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004 ), 60.Google Scholar
  22. 41.
    Christine Jones, “Bodily Functions: A Reading of Gender Performativity in Samuel Beckett’s Rockaby,” in Samuel Beckett: A Casebook, ed. Jennifer M. Jeffers ( London: Routledge, 1998 ), 189.Google Scholar
  23. 49.
    From Asmus, “Rehearsal Notes for the German Première of Beckett’s That Time and Footfalls,” quoted in Theatrical Notebooks of Samuel Beckett: The Shorter Plays, ed. S. E. Gontarski ( London: Faber, 1992 ), 283–284.Google Scholar
  24. 51.
    William Worthen, Print and the Poetics of Modern Drama ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009 ), 174.Google Scholar
  25. 52.
    David Pattie, “Space, Time and the Self in Beckett’s Late Theater,” Modern Drama 43 (2000): 400.Google Scholar
  26. 57.
    Luce Irigaray, Ethics of Sexual Difference, trans. Carolyn Burke and Gillian Gill (London: Athlone Press, 1993 ), 41–42.Google Scholar
  27. 59.
    Anna McMullan, “Samuel Beckett’s Theater: Liminal Subjects and the Politics of Perception,” Princeton University Library Chronicle 67 (2006): 445.Google Scholar
  28. 62.
    Luce Irigaray, Speculum of the Other Woman, trans. Gillian C. Gill ( Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985 ), 116.Google Scholar
  29. 63.
    Peter Gidal, Understanding Beckett: A Study of Monologue and Gesture in the Works of Samuel Beckett (London: Macmillan, 1986), 163, quoted in McMullan, Theatre on Trial, 101.Google Scholar
  30. 64.
    Samuel Beckett, The Beckett Trilogy: Molloy, Malone Dies, The Unnamable (London: Pan Books, 2006 ), 352.Google Scholar
  31. 69.
    James Knowlson and John Pilling, Frescoes of the Skull: The Later Prose and Drama of Samuel Beckett ( London: Calder, 1979 ), 227.Google Scholar
  32. 70.
    Martha Dow Fehsenfeld and Lois More Overbeck, eds., The Letters of Samuel Beckett 1929–1940 ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009 ), 518.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Trish McTighe 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Trish McTighe

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations