Organizing a Buddhist Way

  • Dian Marie Hosking

Abstract

In the last 30 or 40 years, the field of organization studies has been marked by discussion of what have variously been called paradigms, discourses of science, thought styles or cultures of inquiry (Alvesson and Deetz, 2000; Bentz and Shapiro, 1998; Chia, 1995; Guba and Lincoln, 1994). These, let’s call them ‘cultures’, differ in their assumptions about what exists, what we humans can know about what exists and how that knowledge can be produced. They also differ in whether they centre an individual inquirer or relational processes, in whether they present inquiry as if it were with or ‘without philosophy’ (Bentz and Shapiro, 1998) and in whether inquiry is presented as with or without cultural and historical embeddedness (Hosking, 2011).

Keywords

Relational Process Light Structure Relational Reality Appreciative Inquiry Positivist Science 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alvesson, M. and Deetz, S. (2000) Doing Critical Management Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, H. (1997) Conversation, Language and Possibilities: A Postmodern Approach to Therapy. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  3. Barrett, F. (2006) ‘Living in Organizations: Lessons from Jazz Improvisation’, in D. M. Hosking and S. McNamee (eds), The Social Construction of Organiza tion.Google Scholar
  4. Malmo, Sweden: Liber and Copenhagen Business School Press, pp. 269–77Google Scholar
  5. Bateson, G. (1972) Steps to an Ecology of Mind. New York: Chandler. Organizing a Buddhist Way 87Google Scholar
  6. Bateson, G. and Bateson, M. C. (1987) Angels Fear: Toward an Epistemology of the Sacred. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Bentz, V. M. and Shapiro, J. J. (1998) Mindful Inquiry in Social Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Berendt, J. E. (1992). The Third Ear. NY: Henry Holt and Co.Google Scholar
  9. Berman, M. (1981) The Re-enchantment of the World. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Berman, M. (1990) Coming to Our Senses. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  11. Billig, M. (1987) Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bohm, D. (2004) On Dialogue. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Chasin, R., Herzig, M., Roth, S., Chasin, L. and Becker, C. (1996) ‘From Diatribe to Dialogue on Divisive Public Issues: Approaches Drawn from Family Therapy’, Mediation Quarterly 13.4: 323–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chia, R. (1995) ‘From Modern to Postmodern Organizational Analysis’, Organization Studies 16.4: 579–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chödrön, P. (1995) When Things Fall Apart. Boston, MA: Shambhala Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Chödrön, P. (2001) The Places that Scare You: A Guide to Fearlessness in Difficult Times. Boston, MA: Shambhala Publications.Google Scholar
  17. Clegg, S., Kornberger, M. and Rhodes, C. (2005) ‘Learning, Becoming/Organizing’, Organization 12.2: 147–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cooperrider, D. L. and Shrivastva, S. (1987) ‘Research into Organizational Change and Development’, in R. W. Woodman and W. A. Pasmore (eds), Appreciative Inquiry into Organizational Life. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V., pp. 129–69.Google Scholar
  19. Corradi Fiumara, G. (1990) The Other Side of Language: A Philosophy of Listening. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Dachler, H. P. and Hosking, D. M. (1995) ‘The Primacy of Relations in Socially Constructing Organizational Realities’, in D. M. Hosking, H. P. Dachler and K. J. Gergen (eds), Management and Organization: Relational Alternatives to Individualism. Aldershot: Avebury, pp. 1–29.Google Scholar
  21. Falzon, C. (1998) Foucault and Social Dialogue: Beyond Fragmentation. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Fine, M. (1994) ‘Working the Hyphens: Reinventing Self and Other in Qualitative Research’, in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage, pp. 70–82.Google Scholar
  23. Foucault, M. (1980) Power/Knowledge – Selected Interviews and Other Writings. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  24. Gergen, K. J. (1994) Realities and Relationships: Soundings in Social Construction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gergen, K. J. (1995) ‘Relational Theory and the Discourses of Power’, in D. M. Hosking, H. P. Dachler and K. J. Gergen (eds), Management and Organization: Relational Alternatives to Individualism. Aldershot: Avebury, pp. 29–51.Google Scholar
  26. Gergen, K. J. (1999) An Invitation to Social Construction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Gergen, K. J. and Hosking, D. M. (2006) ‘If You Meet Social Construction along the Road: A Dialogue with Buddhism’, in M. Kwee, K. J. Gergen and F. Koshikawa (eds), Horizons in Buddhist Psychology. Chagrin Falls, OH: Taos Institute Publications, pp. 299–314.Google Scholar
  28. Gergen, K. J. and Thatchenkery, T. J. (1996) ‘Organization Science as Social Construction: Postmodern Potentials’, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 32.4: 356–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gergen, K., McNamee, S. and Barrett, F. (2001) ‘Toward Transformative Dialogue’, International Journal of Public Administration 24.7/8: 679–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Guba, E. G. and Lincoln, Y. S. (1994) ‘Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research’, in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage, pp. 105–17.Google Scholar
  31. Harding, S. (1986) The Science Question in Feminism. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Harding, S. (1991) Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Harding, S. (1998) Is Science Multicultural? Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hora, E. (1992) ‘The Dialogical Self: Beyond Individualism and Rationalism’, American Psychologist 47.1: 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hosking, D. M. (2000) ‘Ecology in Mind, Mindful Practices’, European Journal of Work and Organisational Psychology 9.2: 147–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hosking, D. M. (2006) ‘Discourses of Relations and Relational Processes’, in O. Kyriakidou and M. Ozbilgin (eds), Relational Perspectives in Organization Studies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 265–77.Google Scholar
  37. Hosking, D. M. (2007a) ‘Can Constructionism Be Critical?’, in J. Holstein and J. Gubrium (eds), Handbook of Constructionist Research. New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
  38. Hosking, D. M. (2007b) ‘Sound Constructs: A Constructionist Discourse of Sound Processes and Listening’, Revue Sciences de Gestion 55: 55–75.Google Scholar
  39. Hosking, D. M. (2011) ‘Telling Tales of Relations: Appreciating Relational Constructionism’, Organization Studies 32.1: 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hosking, D. M., Dachler, H. P. and Gergen, K. J. (eds) (1995) Management and Organisation: Relational Alternatives to Individualism. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
  41. Hosking, D. M. and Kleisterlee, E. (2009) ‘Centering the Path’, paper presented to Critical Management Studies Conference, University of Warwick, UK, July 2009. www.relational-constructionism.org/media.Google Scholar
  42. Hosking, D. M. and Morley, I. E. (1991) A Social Psychology of Organising. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  43. Isaacs, W. M. (1993) ‘Taking Flight: Dialogue, Collective Thinking and Organizational Learning’, Organizational Dynamics 22.2: 24–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Isaacs, W. M. (1996) ‘The Process and Potential of Dialogue in Social Change’, Educational Technology ( January/February): 20–30Google Scholar
  45. Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  46. McNamee, S., Gergen, K. J. and associates (1999) Relational Responsibility: Resources for Sustainable Dialogue. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. McNamee, S. and Hosking, D. M. (2012) Research and Social Change: A Relational Constructionist Approach. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Mipham Rinpoche, Jamgon (1997) Gateway to Knowledge, vol. 1. Trans. Erik Pema Kunsang. Hong Kong: Ranjung Yeshe Publications.Google Scholar
  49. Mipham, Sakyong (2005) Ruling Your World. New York: Morgan Books.Google Scholar
  50. Newman, F. and Holzman, L. (1977) The End of Knowing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Ong, W. J. (1967) The Presence of the Word. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Ray, R. A. (2000) Indestructable Truth. Boston and London: Shambhala Publications.Google Scholar
  53. Reason, P. (1994) Participation in Human Inquiry. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Reason, P. and Bradbury, H. (2008) Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rinpoche, Sogyal (2002) The Tibetan Book of Living and Dying. London: Random House.Google Scholar
  56. Sampson, E. E. (1993) Celebrating the Other. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  57. Stenner, P. and Eccleston, C. (1994) ‘On the Textuality of Being’, Theory and Psychology 4.1: 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thich Nhat Hanh (1987) Interbeing: Fourteen Guidelines for Engaged Buddhism. Berkeley: Parallax Press.Google Scholar
  59. Toulmin, S. and Gustavsen, B. (1996) Beyond Theory. Changing Organizations through Participation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Traleg Kyabgon Rinpoche (2005) ‘The Way of Basic Sanity: Chogyam Trungpa Rinpoche’s Perspective on Sutric Buddhism’, in Fabrice Midal (ed.), Recalling Chögyam Trungpa. Boston and London: Shambhala Publications. www. thebuddhadharma.com/issues/2006/spring/traleg-trungpa.html.Google Scholar
  61. Trungpa, C. (1973) Cutting through Spiritual Materialism. London and Boston: Shambhala.Google Scholar
  62. Trungpa, C. (1995) The Path Is the Goal. Boston: Shambhala South Asia Editions.Google Scholar
  63. Trungpa, C. (1991) Orderly Chaos. London and Boston: Shabhala Publications.Google Scholar
  64. Trungpa, C. (1996) Meditation in Action. London and Boston: Shambhala Publications.Google Scholar
  65. Vico, G. (1992) ‘The Dialogical Self: Beyond Individualism and Rationalism’, American Psychologist 47.1: 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Watzlawick, P. (1978) The Language of Change: Elements of Therapeutic Communication. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  67. Watzlawick, P., Weakland, J. and Fisch, R. (1974) Change: Principles of Problem Formation and Problem Resolution. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  68. Weick, K. E. (1979) The Social Psychology of Organising. 2nd edn. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  69. Weick, K. E. (1998) ‘Improvisation as a Mindset for Organizational Analysis’, Organization Science 9.5: 543–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wertsch, J. V. (1991) Voices of the Mind. A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  71. Wittgenstein, L. (1953) Philosophical Investigations. Trans. G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dian Marie Hosking 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dian Marie Hosking

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations