The Natural History of Humankind and the Natural History of Man

  • Silvia Sebastiani
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Cultural and Intellectual History book series (CIH)

Abstract

In his lectures on jurisprudence and moral philosophy, given in Glasgow between the 1750s and 1760s, Adam Smith proposed a stage scheme for interpreting the historical evolution of legal, social, and political systems. This marked a turning point in the reflection about human diversity in Scottish intellectual circles. Developing and modifying Smith’s formulation, the leading Scottish historians—Adam Ferguson, William Robertson, John Millar, and Henry Home (Lord Kames)—shaped an original conception of history that became a distinctive feature of the Scottish Enlightenment. Rather than examining heroes, kings, and the political events of kingdoms and states, which formed the core of traditional history, they looked at issues of universal scope, such as manners, customs, and feelings. This new approach disregarded chronology, and outlined the path of peoples toward civilization: a “history of civil society.”

Keywords

Civil Society National Character Moral Philosophy Human Species Commercial Society 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    John Millar, Origin of the Distinction of Ranks (1779), in William C. Lehmann, John Millar of Glasgow 1735–1801: His Life and Thought and His Contributions to Sociological Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 1960), 176.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Paul Wood, “The Fittest Man in the Kingdom: Thomas Reid and the Glasgow Chair of Moral Philosophy,” Hume Studies 23 (1997): 277–313. Smith was appointed professor of Moral Philosophy at the University of Glasgow in 1752, after Thomas Craigie’s death. In 1764, his place was taken by Thomas Reid, who held the chair for the following 30 years until his death in 1796.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anne Robert Jacques Turgot, Plan d’un ouvrage sur la géographie politique (1750), in Œuvres et documents le concernant, ed. Gustave Schelle, 5 vols. (Paris: Librairie Felix Alcan, 1913–23), I: 257.Google Scholar
  4. See Michael Heffernan, “On Geography and Progress: Turgot’s Plan d’un ouvrage sur la géographie politique (1751) and the Origins of Modern Progressive Thought,” Political Geography 13 (1994): 328–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    John Locke, Two Treatises on Government (1689), ed. Peter Laslett (Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 1970), 319.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Turgot, Plan des deux discours sur l’histoire universelle, in Œuvres de Turgot, ed. Eugène Daire, 2 vols. (Paris: Guillaumin, 1844. Reprint Osnabrück: Otto Zeller, 1966), II: 646.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    John Millar, An Historical View of the English Government, from the Settlement of the Saxons in Britain to the Revolution in 1688, ed. John Craig and James Mylne, 4 vols. (London: Mawman, 1803), IV: 286–87.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Paul B. Wood, “The Natural History of Man in the Scottish Enlightenment,” History of Science 27 (1989): 89–123.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dugald Stewart, Account of the Life and Writings of Adam Smith, in Biographical Memoirs of Adam Smith, L.L.D., of William Robertson, D.D. and of Thomas Reid, D.D. (Edinburgh: W. Creech, 1811), 14.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stewart, Account of the Life and Writings of Adam Smith, 50. See also Stewart, Dissertation: Exhibiting the Progress of Metaphysical, Ethical, and Political Philosophy, since the Revival of Letters in Europe, in Collected Works, ed. William Hamilton (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clarck, 1854), I: 177.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Duncan Forbes, “Scientific Whiggism: Adam Smith and John Millar,” Cambridge Journal 7 (1954): 630–70.Google Scholar
  12. Ronald L. Meek, Social Science and the Ignoble Savage (Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 1976), 99–130.Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    Adam Smith, Lectures on Jurisprudence, ed. Ronald L. Meek, David D. Raphael, and Peter G. Stein (Oxford: Oxford U. P., 1978), 14–16.Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    From a huge literature, see Manfred Riedel, “Gesellschaft, bürgerliche,”, Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, ed. Otto Brunner, Werner Conze, and Reinhart Koselleck (Stuttgart: Klett, 1975), II: 719–800.Google Scholar
  15. Adam B. Seligman, The Idea of Civil Society (New York: Free Press, 1995).Google Scholar
  16. Specifically on the British context: Civil Society in British History: Ideas, Identities, Institutions, ed. Jose Harris (Oxford: Oxford U. P., 2003).Google Scholar
  17. 14.
    John Keane, “Despotism and Democracy: The Origins and Development of the Distinction between Civil Society and the State, 1750–1850,”, Civil Society and the State: New European Perspectives, ed. John Keane (London and New York: Verso, 1988), 35–71.Google Scholar
  18. 15.
    Lawrence E. Klein, Shaftesbury and the Culture of Politeness: Moral Discourse and Cultural Politics in Early Eighteenth-Century England (Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Klein, “Politeness and the Interpretation of the British Eighteenth Century,” The Historical Journal 45 (2002): 869–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 16.
    Jane Rendall, “The Progress of Civilization: Women, Gender, and Enlightened Perspectives on Civil Society c. 1750–1800,”, Civil Society and Gender Justice: Historical and Comparative Perspectives, ed. Gunilla Budde, Karen Hagemann, and Sonya Michel (New York: Berghahn, 2008), 59–78.Google Scholar
  21. Mary Catherine Moran, “‘The Commerce of the Sexes’: Gender and the Social Sphere in Scottish Enlightenment Accounts of Civil Society,”, Paradoxes of Civil Society: New Perspectives on Modern German and British History, ed. Frank Trentmann (New York and Oxford: Berghahn, 2000), 61–85.Google Scholar
  22. 17.
    Bernard Mandeville, The Fable of the Bees or Private Vices, Publick Benefits (1714), ed. Frederick B. Kaye, 2 vols. (1924) (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1988).Google Scholar
  23. See Edward G. Hundert, The Enlightenment Fable: Bernard Mandeville and the Discovery of Society (Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 18.
    Among the extensive literature about the concept of civilization, see: Norbert Elias, The Civilizing Process (1939), trans. Edmund Jephcott (Oxford: Blackwell, 1982).Google Scholar
  25. Lucien Febvre, “Civilisation: évolution d’un mot et d’un groupe d’idées” (1930), in Pour une histoire à part entière (Paris: SEVPEN, 1962), 481–528.Google Scholar
  26. Jean Starobinski, “Le mot civilisation,”, Le Remède dans le mal. Critique et légitimation de l’artifice à l’âge des Lumières (Paris: Gallimard, 1989), 11–59. In recent years, see: Johan Goudsblom, “Civilization: The Career of a Controversial Concept,” History and Theory 45 (2006): 288–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Bertrand Binoche, “La civilisation: équivoques statutaires,”, La raison sans l’histoire: échantillons pour une histoire comparée des philosophies de l’histoire (Paris: PUF, 2007), 301–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 19.
    William Robertson, The History of the Reign of the Emperor Charles V: With a View of the Progress of Civil Society in Europe from the Subversion of the Roman Empire to the Beginning of the Sixteenth Century (London, 1769), 21–22.Google Scholar
  29. 20.
    Robertson, Histoire du règne de l’empereur Charles-Quint, trans. Jean-Baptiste-Antoine Suard, 6 vols. (Amsterdam, 1771), I: 23 and 41–42. In the passage quoted above, “refinement” was translated as “politesse.” See Febvre, “Civilisation,” 489–90.Google Scholar
  30. “On Monday, March 23 [1772], I found him [Johnson] busy, preparing a fourth edition of his folio Dictionary. […] He would not admit civilization, but only civility. With great deference to him, I thought civilization, from to civilize, better in the sense opposed to barbarity, than civility; as it is better to have a distinct word for each sense, than one word with two senses, which civility is, in his way of using it.”. See James Boswell, Life of Samuel Johnson (1791), ed. Robert W. Chapman (Oxford: Oxford U. P., 1980), 466. In French, the term was first used in L’ami des hommes ou traité de la population (1756) by the Marquis de Mirabeau.Google Scholar
  31. 22.
    Despite the numerous revisions Johnson made in the fourth edition of his Dictionary, he made no changes in the three entries on “civilisation,” “civility,” and “to civilise.” “Civilisation” was defined as “a law, act of justice, or judgment, which renders a criminal process civil; which is performed by turning an information into an inquest, or the contrary”; “Civility” as “1. Freedom from barbarity; the state of being civilised. 2. Politeness; complaisance; elegance of behaviour. 3. Rule of decency, practice of politeness”; while the definition for “to civilise” was: “to reclaim from savageness and barbarity to instruct in the arts of regular life.” See Samuel Johnson, The Dictionary of the English Language, 2 vols., IV ed. (London: W. Strahan, 1773), I: 401.Google Scholar
  32. 23.
    Anthony Pagden, “The ‘Defence of Civilization’ in Eighteenth-Century Social Theory,” History of the Human Sciences 1 (1988): 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 24.
    Fania Oz-Salzberger, “Civil Society in the Scottish Enlightenment,”, Civil Society. History and Possibilities, ed. Sudipta Kaviraj and Sunil Khilnani (Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 2001), 58–83.Google Scholar
  34. Oz-Salzberger, Translating the Enlightenment: Scottish Civic Discourse in Eighteenth-Century Germany (Oxford: Oxford U. P., 1995), 148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 25.
    From an extensive literature: Hans Medick, Naturzustand und Naturgeschichte der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft: Die Ursprunge der bürgerlichen Sozialtheorie als Geschichtsphilosophie und Sozialwissenschaft bei Samuel Pufendorf, John Locke und Adam Smith (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1973).Google Scholar
  36. John G. A. Pocock, The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Tradition (Princeton: Princeton U. P., 1975).Google Scholar
  37. Duncan Forbes, “Natural Law in the Scottish Enlightenment,”, The Origins and Nature of the Scottish Enlightenment, ed. Roy H. Campbell and Andrew S. Skinner (Edinburgh: J. Donald, 1982), 186–204.Google Scholar
  38. Knud Haakonssen, The Science of a Legislator: The Natural Jurisprudence of David Hume and Adam Smith (Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Haakonssen, Natural Law and Moral Philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment (Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment, ed. Istvan Hont and Michael Ignatieff (Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 1983).Google Scholar
  41. 26.
    Adam Smith, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776), ed. Roy H. Campbell, Andrew S. Skinner, and William B. Todd, 2 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976), I: 26–27.Google Scholar
  42. 27.
    Istvan Hont, Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective (Cambridge and London: Harvard U. P., 2005), 159–84.Google Scholar
  43. 28.
    Nicholas Phillipson, “The Pursuit of Virtue in Scottish University Education: Dugald Stewart and Scottish Moral Philosophy in the Enlightenment,”, Universities, Society and the Future, ed. Nicholas Phillipson (Edinburgh, Edinburgh U. P. 1983), 92.Google Scholar
  44. Phillipson, “Language, Sociability and History: Some Reflections on the Foundation of Adam Smith’s Science of Man,”, Economy, Polity and Society: British Intellectual History, 1750–1950, ed. Stefan Collini, Richard Whatmore, and Brian Young (Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 2000), 70–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 29.
    David Hume, Treatise of Human Nature (1739), ed. Lewis A. Selby-Bigge, II edn. with Revisions and Notes by Peter H. Nidditch (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1985), 603–4. See Sunil Khilnani, “Introduction: Ideas of Civil Society” and “The Development of Civil Society,”, Civil Society, 1–8 and 11–32, respectively.Google Scholar
  46. 30.
    Oz-Salzberger, “Civil Society in the Scottish Enlightenment,” 64; Janet Todd, Sensibility: An Introduction (New York: Methuen, 1986).Google Scholar
  47. John Mullan, Sentiment and Sociability: The Language of Feeling in the Eighteenth Century (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988).Google Scholar
  48. Philip Carter, Men and the Emergence of Polite Society in Britain, 1660–1800 (Harlow: Longman, 2001).Google Scholar
  49. John Tosh, “The Old Adam and the New Man: Emerging Themes in the History of Masculinity,”, English Masculinities, 1660–1800, ed. Tim Hitchcock and Michèle Cohen (London: Longman, 1999), 217–38.Google Scholar
  50. 31.
    Nicholas Phillipson, Hume (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1989), 32ff.Google Scholar
  51. 32.
    Hume, Treatise, 486–90; Hume, “That Politics May Be Reduced to a Science,”, Essays Moral, Political and Literary (I edn. 1742; 1777), ed. Eugene F. Miller (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1985), 14–31.Google Scholar
  52. on which see Duncan Forbes, Hume’s Philosophical Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 1975), 229–30.Google Scholar
  53. 37.
    Adam Ferguson, An Essay on the History of Civil Society (1767), ed. Duncan Forbes (Edinburgh: Edinburgh U. P., 1966), 145; on which, see Oz-Salzberger, “Civil Society in the Scottish Enlightenment,” 68.Google Scholar
  54. 38.
    In private, Hume expressed his disappointment at Ferguson’s Essay and the fear that his republican approach could damage the reputation of the literati of Edinburgh. See Hume to Blair, February 11, 1766, and April 1, 1767, in The Letters of David Hume, ed. John Y. T. Greig, 2 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1932), II: 11–12, 133.Google Scholar
  55. This reaction contrasted with Hume’s high personal appreciation of Ferguson, on which see Richard B. Sher, Church and University in the Scottish Enlightenment: The Moderate Literati of Edinburgh (Edinburgh: Edinburgh U. P., 1985), 195–98.Google Scholar
  56. 40.
    Ronald Hamowy, The Scottish Enlightenment and the Theory of Spontaneous Order (Carbondale: Southern Illinois U. P., 1987).Google Scholar
  57. Daniele Francesconi, L’età della storia. Linguaggi storiografici dell’Illuminismo scozzese (Bologna: Il Mulino, 2003).Google Scholar
  58. 42.
    Montesquieu, Lettres persanes (1721), Letters XI–XIV, in Œuvres complètes de Montesquieu, ed. André Masson (Paris: Nagel, 1950), I: 26–36.Google Scholar
  59. Richard B. Sher, “From Troglodytes to Americans: Montesquieu and the Scottish Enlightenment on Liberty, Virtue, and Commerce,”, Republicanism, Liberty and Commercial Society, 1649–1776, ed. David Wootton (Stanford: Stanford U. P., 1994), 369–71.Google Scholar
  60. John G.A. Pocock, “The Varieties of Whiggism from Exclusion to Reform: A History of Ideology and Discourse,”, Virtue, Commerce, and History: Essays on Political Thought and History, Chiefly in the Eighteenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 1985), 215–310. All the essays in Wealth and Virtue, which I have often mentioned here, revolve around this problematic tension.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 45.
    Pocock, Machiavellian Moment, 499–500; David Spadafora, The Idea of Progress in Eighteenth-Century Britain (New Haven: Yale U. P., 1990), chap. 7.Google Scholar
  62. Malcolm Jack, Corruption & Progress. The Eighteenth-Century Debate (New York: AMS Press, 1989), chaps. 4 and 5.Google Scholar
  63. Montesquieu, De l’Esprit des lois (1748), in Œuvres, I: book XI, chap. 6, 207–22 and book XIX, chap. 27, 432–44. Ferguson’s Essay has been defined by Pocock as “perhaps the most Machiavellian of the Scottish disquisitions of this theme,”, Machiavellian Moment, 499.Google Scholar
  64. 47.
    Ferguson, History of Civil Society, 269n. See Fania Oz-Salzberger, “Scots, Germans, Republic and Commerce,”, Republicanism, A Shared European Heritage, ed. Martin Van Gelderen and Quentin Skinner, 2 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 2002), II: 197–226. Marco Geuna, “Republicanism and Commercial Society in the Scottish Enlightenment: The Case of Adam Ferguson,”, Republicanism, II: 177–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Geuna, “La tradizione repubblicana e i suoi interpreti: famiglie teoriche e discontinuità concettuali,” Filosofia politica 12 (1998): 101–32.Google Scholar
  66. 48.
    Hume, “Of the Coalition of Parties” (1758), in Essays, 493.Google Scholar
  67. 51.
    Adam Ferguson, The History of the Progress and Termination of the Roman Republic, 3 vols. (London and Edinburgh: Strahan, Cadell & Creech, 1783). Francesconi stresses that the eulogy of conflict totally disappears in Ferguson’s Roman history, in L’età della storia, 227–81.Google Scholar
  68. 53.
    Millar, Origin of the Distinction of Ranks, 175–81; Christopher J. Berry, The Social Theory of the Scottish Enlightenment (Edinburgh: Edinburgh U. P., 1997), 64.Google Scholar
  69. 54.
    Ferguson, History of Civil Society, 79. See Mark S. Phillips, “‘If Mrs. Mure Be Not Sorry for the Poor King Charles’: History, Novel, and The Sentimental Reader,” History Workshop Journal 43 (1997), 110–31.Google Scholar
  70. Phillips, Society and Sentiments: Genres of Historical Writing in Britain 1740–1820 (Princeton: Princeton U. P., 2000), 179–84.Google Scholar
  71. 55.
    Adam Smith, Lectures on Rhetoric and Belles Lettres, ed. J. C. Bryce (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1985), 154–62.Google Scholar
  72. 56.
    Robertson, A View of the Progress of Civil Society in Europe, 69–72; Millar, The Origin of the Distinction of Ranks, 214–18; Ferguson, History of Civil Society, 201–3; Henry Home, Lord Kames, Sketches of the History of Man (1774), 4 vols. (Edinburgh and London: W. Creech, W. Strahan and T. Cadell, 1778), book I, II: 90, 92–97.Google Scholar
  73. 59.
    Robertson, A View of the Progress of Civil Society in Europe, 76; Hume, “Of Refinement in the Arts,” 271, 276–78; Hume, “Of Commerce,” 255–56, 262, 265–66. On the meaning and value of commerce in eighteenth-century Britain, see John G. A. Pocock, “Clergy and Commerce: The Conservative Enlightenment in England,”, L’età dei lumi. Studi storici sul Settecento europeo in onore di Franco Venturi, ed. Raffaele Ajello, Massimo Firpo, Luciano Guerci, and Giuseppe Ricuperati, 2 vols. (Naples: Jovene, 1985), I: 525–62.Google Scholar
  74. John Brewer, “Commercialization and Politics,”, The Birth of a Consumer Society: The Commercialization of Eighteenth-Century England, ed. Neil McKendrick, John Brewer, and John H. Plumb (London: Europa, 1982), 197–262.Google Scholar
  75. 60.
    Hume, “Of the Jealousy of Trade” (1758), in Essays, 331, on which, see Hont, Jealousy of Trade, 11–36.Google Scholar
  76. 64.
    William Robertson, The History of America (1777), 3 vols., V edn. (London: Strahan, 1788), book IV, II: 30–31; see also Millar, Origin of the Distinction of Ranks, 177.Google Scholar
  77. 67.
    See Jürgen Osterhammel, “Modi di rappresentazione dell’estraneo nel Settecento: l’esperienza della distanza,” Comunità XLIII (1989): 36–68.Google Scholar
  78. Reinhart Koselleck, “Space of Experience and Horizon of Expectations: Two Historical Categories,”, Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time (1979), trans. Keith Tribe (New York: Columbia U. P., 2004), 255–75.Google Scholar
  79. Henry Vyverberg, Human Nature, Cultural Diversity and the French Enlightenment (Oxford: Oxford U. P., 1989), 53–63.Google Scholar
  80. Phillips, “Distance and Historical Representation,” History Workshop Journal 57 (2004): 123–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 70.
    Turgot, Plan d’un ouvrage sur la géographie politique, in Œuvres, ed. Schelle, I: 259–60; Tableau philosophique, in Œuvres, ed. Schelle, I: 216–18; and Plan des deux discours, in Œuvres, ed. Daire, II: 631–32, 646. See Ronald L. Meek, Turgot on Progress, Sociology and Economics (Cambridge: Cambridge U.P., 1973), 8–12.Google Scholar
  82. 74.
    Voltaire, Traité de métaphysique (1734), in Œuvres complètes, ed. Louis Moland (Paris: Garnier frères, 1877–85. Reprint Nendeln, Liechtenstein: Kraus Reprint, 1967), XXII: 192.Google Scholar
  83. John S. Spink, French Free-Thoughts from Gassendi to Voltaire (London: Athlone Press, 1960), 321.Google Scholar
  84. 75.
    William Petty, The Petty Papers: Some Unpublished Writings of Sir William Petty, Edited from the Bowood Papers by the Marquis of Lansdowne (London: Houghton Mifflin Co.; Boston and New York: Constable & Co., 1927), II: 30–31.Google Scholar
  85. See Giuliano Gliozzi, Adamo e il Nuovo Mondo. La nascita dell’antropologia come ideologia coloniale: dalle genealogie alle teorie razziali 1500–1700 (Florence: Sansoni, 1977), 594–621.Google Scholar
  86. 76.
    John Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1689), ed. Peter H. Nidditch (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975), 453–54.Google Scholar
  87. 78.
    Voltaire, Eléments de la philosophie de Newton mis à la portée de tout le monde (1738), in Œuvres, XXII: 430. In Britain they appeared in the same year as: The Elements of Sir Isaac Newton’s Philosophy … Revised and Corrected by J. Hanna (London: Stephen Austen, 1738; II edn. Glasgow: Robert Urie, 1764).Google Scholar
  88. 79.
    Voltaire, Histoire de Jenni (1775), in Œuvres, XXI: 560; Voltaire, “Population,” Dictionnaire philosophique, in Œuvres, XX: 254–55;Google Scholar
  89. Voltaire, Essai sur les mœurs et l’esprit des nations (1756), ed. René Pomeau, 2 vols. (Paris: Garnier frères, 1963), I: 7.Google Scholar
  90. 80.
    Michèle Duchet, Anthropologie et histoire au siècle des Lumières (1971), Postface Claude Blanckaert (Paris: Albin Michel, 1995), 281–321.Google Scholar
  91. Jean-Michel Moureaux, “Race et altérité dans l’anthropologie voltairienne,”, L’idée de “race” dans les sciences humaines et la littérature (XVIIIe et XIXe siècles), ed. Sarga Moussa (Paris: L’Harmattan, 2003), 41–53.Google Scholar
  92. 81.
    Arthur O. Lovejoy, The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea (Cambridge: Harvard U. P., 1936), 208ff; Voltaire, “Monstres,” Dictionnaire philosophique, in Œuvres, XX: 107–9; Voltaire, Essai sur les mœurs, II: 319.Google Scholar
  93. 82.
    La philosophie de l’histoire (Amsterdam: Changuion, 1765)—censured by French clergy in August 1765 and placed on the Index in December 1768—was among those works by Voltaire that the publisher Robert Urie in Glasgow brought out within a year of the appearance of the French edition; in 1764 he reedited The Newtonian Philosophy compared with that of Leibnitz. See John H. Brumfitt, “Scotland and the French Enlightenment,”, The Age of Enlightenment: Studies Presented to Theodore Besterman, ed. William H. Barber et al. (Edinburgh and London: Oliver & Boyd, 1967), 322–28.Google Scholar
  94. 83.
    Voltaire, Essai sur les mœurs, I: 215; II: 305–6, 319; Voltaire, Relation touchant un Maure Blanc amené à Paris en 1744, in Œuvres, XXIII: 189–91; Voltaire, “Chaîne des êtres créés” and “Monstres,” Dictionnaire philosophique, in Œuvres, XVIII: 123–25; XX: 108–9. See Michèle Duchet, Le partage des savoirs: Discours historique, discours ethnologique (Paris: La Découverte, 1985), 53–63.Google Scholar
  95. 87.
    Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Discours sur l’origine et les fondements de l’inégalité parmi les hommes (1755), in Œuvres complètes, ed. Bernard Gagnebin and Marcel Raymond (Paris: Gallimard, 1964), III: 132–33. See Duchet, Anthropologie et histoire, 329–35.Google Scholar
  96. 88.
    Rousseau, Essai sur l’origine des langues, Introduction et notes Angèle Kremer-Marietti (Paris: Aubier Montaigne, 1974), 192–94.Google Scholar
  97. 89.
    Ann Thomson, “From l’Histoire Naturelle de l’Homme to the Natural History of Mankind,” British Journal for Eighteenth-Century Studies 9 (1986): 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. See Gunnar Broberg, Linnaeus: Progress and Prospects in Linnaean Research (Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell, 1980).Google Scholar
  99. 91.
    Sergio Moravia, “Moral-Phisique: Genesis and Evolution of a Rapport”, in Enlightenment Studies in Honour of Lester G. Crocker, ed. Alfred J. Bingham and Virgil W. Topazio (Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 1979).Google Scholar
  100. Robert Wokler, “From l’homme physique to l’homme moral and Back: Towards a History of Enlightenment Anthropology,” History of Human Sciences 6 (1993): 121–38; Rousseau, Discours sur l’origine et les fondements de l’inégalité, 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 92.
    Wood, “The Natural History of Man”; Sergio Moravia, “The Enlightenment and the Sciences of Man,” History of Science 18 (1980): 247–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 93.
    Adam Smith, “Letter to the Edinburgh Review”, in Essays on Philosophical Subjects, ed. William P. D. Wightman and J. C. Bryce (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1982), 242–54. Besides the works of Rousseau, Smith’s library also contained Buffon’s Histoire naturelle and many of Linnaeus’s texts, including the Philosophia Botanica (1751), Genera Plantarum (1762), Species Plantarum (1762–63), and the XIV edition of the Systema Naturae (1768). Smith explicitly used Linnaeus’s observations in his planned essay “Of the External Senses,”, Essay on Philosophical Subjects, 162, 164, 166. See Bonar, A Catalogue of the Library of Adam Smith, 101–2.Google Scholar
  103. 96.
    Ferguson, History of Civil Society, 1–10, 16. On the social nature of man: Norbert Waszek, Man’s Social Nature: A Topic of the Scottish Enlightenment in Its Historical Setting (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 1986).Google Scholar
  104. 97.
    Buffon, Histoire naturelle générale et particulière (Paris: Imprimerie Royale, 1749–89), IV (1753): 438–40.Google Scholar
  105. Michèle Duchet, “L’anthropologie de Buffon,” in Georges-Louis L. Buffon, De l’Homme, ed. Michèle Duchet (Paris: Maspero, 1971), 21.Google Scholar
  106. 102.
    Claude Blanckaert, “Contre la méthode. Unité de l’homme et classification dans l’anthropologie des Lumières,”, La Fabrication de l’humain dans les cultures et en anthropologie, ed. Claude Calame and Mondher Kilani (Lausanne: Payot, 1999), 111–26.Google Scholar
  107. Phillip R. Sloan, “The Buffon-Linneaus Controversy,” Isis 67 (1975): 356–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Giulio Barsanti, “Linné et Buffon: deux visions différentes de la nature et de l’histoire naturelle,” Revue de synthèse 113–114 (1984): 83–111.Google Scholar
  109. 103.
    Edward Tyson, Orang-Outang, sive Homo Sylvestris: Or, the Anatomy of a Pygmie Compared With That of a Monkey, an Ape, and a Man, 2 vols. (London: T. Bennet, 1699). See Franck Tinland, L’homme sauvage. Homo ferus et homo sylvestris: de l’animal à l’homme (1968) (Paris: L’Harmattan, 2003) chap. 3.Google Scholar
  110. Robert Wokler, “Tyson and Buffon on the Orang-Utan,” Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century 155 (1976): 2301–19.Google Scholar
  111. 104.
    Rousseau, Discours sur l’origine et les fondements de l’inégalité, 208–12, note X. According to Robert Wokler, Rousseau was the first to hypothesize a human descent from the apes: “Perfectible Apes in Decadent Cultures: Rousseau’s Anthropology Revisited,” Daedalus 107 (1978): 107–34.Google Scholar
  112. 106.
    Peter H. Reill, “Science and the Science of History in the Spätaufklärung”, in Aufklärung und Geschichte: Studien zur deutschen Geschichtswissenschaft im 18. Jahrhundert, ed. Hans E. Bödeker, Georg G. Iggers, Jonathan B. Knudsen, and Peter H. Reill (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1992), 430–51, esp. 433–36.Google Scholar
  113. 107.
    See Paul B. Wood, “Buffon’s Reception in Scotland: The Aberdeen Connection,” Annals of Science 44 (1987): 171–72, 177; Wood, “The Natural History of Man,” 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Ian Simpson Ross, Lord Kames and the Scotland of His Day (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1972), 173–76.Google Scholar
  115. Luigi Turco, “Lord Kames, John Stuart e le leggi del moto,”, Scienza e filosofia scozzese nell’età di Hume, ed. Antonio Santucci (Bologna: Il Mulino, 1976), 75–111.Google Scholar
  116. 108.
    Buffon, The Natural History of the Horse…Translated from the French of.… M. de Buffon (London: R. Griffith, 1762).Google Scholar
  117. on which, see the interesting review by William Bewley in the Monthly Review 27 (1762): 41–48.Google Scholar
  118. Now also in Race: the Origins of an Idea, 1760–1850, ed. Hannah F. Augstein (Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1996), 1–9.Google Scholar
  119. In the attribution of the reviewers, I follow Benjamin Christie Nangle, The Monthly Review First Series 1749–1789: Indexes of Contributors and Articles (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1934).Google Scholar
  120. Nangle, The Monthly Review Second Series 1789–1844: Indexes of Contributors and Articles (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1955).Google Scholar
  121. 109.
    Oliver Goldsmith, An History of the Earth and Animated Nature, 8 vols. (London: J. Nourse, 1774).Google Scholar
  122. 110.
    Georges-Louis L. Buffon, Natural History, General and Particular. Translated into English with Notes and Observations by the Translator, trans. William Smellie, 9 vols. (Edinburgh: William Creech, 1780–85; reprint ed. Aaron Garrett, Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 2000).Google Scholar
  123. See Jeff Loveland, “Georges-Louis Leclerc de Buffon’s Histoire naturelle in English. 1775–1815,” Archives of Natural History 31 (2004): 214–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. 113.
    Wood, “The Science of Man,”, Cultures of Natural History, ed. Nicholas Jardine, James A. Secord, and Emma C. Spary (Cambridge: Cambridge U. P., 1995), 205–6; Wood, “The Natural History of Man,” 100–1.Google Scholar
  125. 114.
    Adam Ferguson, Principles of Moral and Political Science; Being Chiefly a Retrospect of Lectures delivered in the College of Edinburgh, 2 vols. (Edinburgh: Strahan, Cadell & Creech, 1792), I: 1–6.Google Scholar
  126. 115.
    Buffon, Histoire naturelle, IV (1753): 385–86 and II (1749): 10–11.Google Scholar
  127. See Phillip R. Sloan, “From Logical Universals to Historical Individuals: Buffon’s Idea of Biological Species,”, Histoire du concept d’espèce dans les sciences de la vie, ed. Scott Atran et al. (Paris: Editions de la Fondation Singer-Polignac, 1987), 101–40.Google Scholar
  128. on which, see Arthur O. Lovejoy, “Buffon and the Problem of Species,”, Forerunners of Darwin: 1745–1859, ed. Bentley Glass, Temkin Owsei, and William L. Strauss Jr. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1968), 93–94.Google Scholar
  129. 117.
    Buffon, Histoire naturelle, XIV (1766): 311–12.Google Scholar
  130. 119.
    See Phillip R. Sloan, “The Idea of Racial Degeneracy in Buffon’s Histoire Naturelle”, in Racism in the Eighteenth Century, ed. Harold E. Pagliaro (Cleveland: Case Western Reserve U. P., 1973), 306.Google Scholar
  131. For an alternative interpretation: John H. Eddy Jr., “Buffon’s Histoire Naturelle: History? A Critique of Recent Interpretations,” Isis 85 (1994): 651–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. On Buffon’s ethnocentrism: Jacques Roger, Buffon. Un philosophe au Jardin du Roi (Paris: Fayard, 1989), 236.Google Scholar
  133. 120.
    Buffon, Histoire naturelle, III (1749): 530.Google Scholar
  134. 123.
    Claude Blanckaert, “Buffon and the Natural History of Man: Writing History and the ‘Foundational Myth’ of Anthropology,” History of the Human Sciences 6 (1993): 13–50; Blanckaert, “Les conditions d’émergence de la science des races au début du XIXe siècle,”, L’idée de “race”, 136–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 124.
    “Pour que l’histoire naturelle apparaisse”—Michel Foucault wrote in Les Mots et les Choses (Paris: Gallimard, 1966), 140, 150—it was necessary “que l’histoire devienne naturelle.” In order to realize this fundamental change in Western culture it was indispensable to substitute “l’anatomie au classement, l’organisme à la structure, la subordination interne au caractère visible, la série au tableau.” Meanwhile, nature had to be historicized. On this aspect.Google Scholar
  136. Peter H. Reill, Vitalizing Nature in the Enlightenment (Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press, 2005).Google Scholar
  137. The Moral Authority of Nature, ed. Lorraine Daston and Fernando Vidal (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Silvia Sebastiani 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silvia Sebastiani

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations