Skip to main content

Family Policy and Fertility: Do Policies Make a Difference?

  • Chapter
Fertility Rates and Population Decline

Part of the book series: Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life ((PSFL))

Abstract

In view of persistent very low levels of fertility (as discussed in Part I of this volume), many governments in Europe and other industrialized countries have been asking the questions of how best to support families and, in some cases, how to also encourage young people to have more children? Perhaps ironically, in the 1960s some of the same governments were instead concerned by their rapidly increasing population and high fertility (Gauthier 1996). Today, however, the situation is very different: not only has fertility remained below replacement level for more than three decades in numerous countries, but the spectre of a rapidly ageing population is also raising great worries among governments (Burnett 2007; Cowell 1993; Zeller 2010).’ Whether or not governments should be concerned by this situation and whether or not they should actually intervene to raise fertility are however difficult questions which raise complex economic and ethical issues. In this chapter, we do not venture on that terrain but instead focus on the seemingly simple question: Can policies influence fertility?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aassve, A. and Lappegard, T. (2009) Childcare cash benefits and fertility timing in Norway, European Journal of Population, 25(1): 413–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azmat, G. and Gonzales, L. (2010) Targeting fertility and female participation through the income tax, Labour Economics, 17(3): 487–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchet, D. and Ekert Jaffé, O. (1994) The demographic impact of family benefits: evidence from a micro-model and from macro-data. In J. Ermisch and N. Ogawa (eds) The Family, the Market and the State in Aging Societies (Oxford: Clarendon Press), pp. 79–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buccuzzo, G., Caltabiano, M., Da11 Zuana, G. and Loghi, M. (2008) The impact of the bonus at birth on reproductive behaviour in a lowest-low fertility contect: Friuli-Venezia Giulia (Italy) from 1989 to 2005, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 125–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, V. (2007) Low birth rate prompts Spain to approve child bonus, The New York Times. Online: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/13/world/europe/13iht-spain.4.6652189.html, date accessed 27 April 2011.

  • Chesnais, J.-C. (1987) Quand un people en devient deux: Une allemagne et l’autre, Population et Sociétés, 209, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowell, A. (1993) Low birth rate is becoming a headache for Italy, The New York Times, 28 August 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Addio, A. C and D’Ercole, M. M. (2005) Policies, institutions and fertilty rates: a panel data analysis for OECD countries, OECD Economic Studies, 41: 7–43. Online: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/61/44/40505223.pdf, date accessed 13 May 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drago, R. Sawyer, K., Sheffler, K. Warren, D. and Wooden, M. (2009) Did Australia’s baby bonus increase the fertility rate?, Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series, no. 1/09 (Melbourne).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, G.-F. and Descroix, P. (1988) La spécificité du comportement démo-graphique de la France: Mesure de la surfécondité relative de la France par rapport aux autres pays industriels à faible fécondité précoce de 1963 à 1986, Histoire, Economie et Société, 7(3): 419–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duvander, A.-Z., Lappegard, T. and Andersson, G. (2010) Family policy and fertility: a comparative study of the impact of fathers’ and mothers’ use of parental leave and continued childbearing in Norway and Sweden, Journal of European Social Policy, 20(1): 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2005) Confronting demographic change: a new solidarity between the generations, Green Paper COM 2005.94 (Brussels: Communication from the Commission of the European Communities).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fokkema, T. and Esveldt, I. (2006) Work Package 7: Child-friendly Policies. Report. Online: http://www.bib-demografie.de/cln_090/nn_965290/SharedDocs/Publikationen/EN/Research/DIALOG/ReportsPapers/dialog_ps_no7,templateld=raw,property=publicationFile.pdf/dialog_ps_no7.pdf, date accessed 12 January 2011.

  • Gabos, A., Gal, R. and Kezdi, G. (2009) Birth order fertility effects of child-related benefits and pensions — a test on Hungarian data, Population Studies, 63(3): 215–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gans, J. S. and Leigh, A. (2009) Born on the first of July: an (un)natural experiment in birth timing, Journal of Public Economics, 93: 246–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, A. H. (1996) The State and the Family (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, A. H. (2002) Family policies in industrialized countries: is there convergence, Population, 57(3): 200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, A. H. (2010) The Impact of the Economic Crisis on Family Policies in the European Union (Brussels: European Commission), 18p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, A. and Hatzius, J. (1997) Family benefits and fertility: an econometric analysis, Population Studies, 51: 295–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, N. D., Smith, N. and Verner, M. (2008) The impact of Nordic countries’ family friendly policies on employment, wages, and children, Review of Economics of the Household, 6(1): 65–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hank, K. and Kreyenfeld, M. (2003) A multilevel analysis of child care and women’s fertility decisions in Western Germany, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 65(3): 584–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heiland, F., Prskawetz, A. and Sanderson, W. C. (2008) Are individuals’ desired family sizes stable? Evidence from West German panel data: European Journal of Population, 24(2): 129–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilgeman, C. and Butts, C. (2009) Women’s employment and fertility: a welfare regime paradox, Social Science Research, 38: 103–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hin, S., Gauthier, A., Goldstein, J. and Buehler, C. (2011) Fertility preferences: what measuring second choices teaches us, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, 135–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalwij, A. (2010) The impact of family policy expenditure on fertility in Western Europe, Demography, 47(2): 503–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lain, S. J., Ford, J. B., Raynes-Greenow, C. H., Hadfield, R. M., Simpson, J. M., Morris, J. M. and Roberts, C. L. (2009) The impact of the baby bonus payment in New South Wales: who is having ‘one for the country’?, The Medical Journal of Australia, 190(5): 238–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landais, C. (2003) Le quotient familial atil stimulé la natalité francaise, Economie Publique, 13: 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lappegard, T. (2010) Family policies and fertility in Norway, European Journal of Population, 26: 99–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. (2011) More babies, but was it the bonus? Australia’s success in raising its birth rate could offer pointers for Singapore. Online: http://www.todayonline.com/Print/World/EDC110205–0000138/More-babies,-but-was-it-the-bonus, date accessed 13 May 2011.

  • Liefbroer, A. C. (2009) Changes in family size intentions across young adulthood: a life-course perspective, European Journal of Population, 25(4): 363–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, W. and Skirbekk, V. (2005) Policies addressing the tempo effect in low-fertility countries, Population and Development Review, 31(4): 699–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P. (ed.) (2010) International Review of Leave Policies and Related Research 2010. Employment Market Analysis and Research Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reggiani, A. H. (1996) Procreating France: the politics of demography, 1919–45, French Historical Studies, 19(3): 725–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rindfuss, R. R., Guilkey, D., Morgan, S. P., Kravdal, O. and Guzzo, K. B. (2007) Child care availability and first-birth timing in Norway, Demography, 44(2): 345–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosina, A. and Testa, M. R. (2009) Couples’ first child intentions and disagreement: an analysis of the Italian case, European Journal of Population, 25(4): 487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, S., Boymal, J. and de Silva, A. (2010) A re-appraisal of the fertility response to the Australian baby bonus, MPRA paper no. 27580, School of Economics, Finance and Marketing, RMIT University. Online: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/27580/, date accessed 13 May 2011.

  • Testa, M. R. (2006) Childbearing Preferences and Family Issues in Europe. Online: http://www.ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_253_en.pdf, date accessed 12 January 2011.

  • Thévenon, O. and Gauthier, A. H. (2011) Family policies in developed countries: a ‘fertility booster’ with side-effects, Community, Work and Family, 14(2): 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, E. (1997) Couple childbearing desires, intentions and births, Demography, 34: 343–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2010) World Population Policies 2009, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs/Population Division, pp. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeller, F. (2010) Low birth rates threaten Asia’s top economies, The Jakarta Globe. Online: http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/business/low-birth-rates-threaten-asias-top-economies/413375, date accessed 26 April 2011.

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Anne H. Gauthier

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gauthier, A.H. (2013). Family Policy and Fertility: Do Policies Make a Difference?. In: Buchanan, A., Rotkirch, A. (eds) Fertility Rates and Population Decline. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137030399_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics