Modernist Eroticisms pp 23-43 | Cite as
Innocent Monsters: The Erotic Child in Early Modernism
Chapter
Abstract
The child as an icon of human self-understanding is Janus-faced. Theologically, children may be limbs of Satan, the vessels of Adam’s sin, or they may be the ‘little children’, theirs the Kingdom of Heaven. In the revolutionary year of 1789, William Blake published his Songs of Innocence, which included the poem ‘Infant Joy’:
The child in ‘Infant Joy’ embodies natural innocence in a new age of hope, but in ‘Infant Sorrow’, one of the Songs of Experience published in 1794, the year of the Terror, a different child is born:‘I have no name:
I am but two days old.’
What shall I call thee?
‘I happy am,
Joy is my name.’
Sweet joy befall thee!1
‘Infant Joy’ and ‘Infant Sorrow’ presage enduring tensions in figurations of human nature and the meaning of innocence in a secular world. The Romantic child is a multifaceted symbol of utopian aspiration and social protest.My mother groan’d, my father wept,
Into the dangerous world I leapt;
Helpless, naked, piping loud
Like a fiend hid in a cloud.2
Keywords
Moral Panic Romantic Child Dangerous World Utopian Aspiration Competitive Capitalism
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
- 1.William Blake, The Poems of William Blake, ed. John Sampson (London: Oxford University Press, 1961), p. 68.Google Scholar
- 3.On the Romantic child in German literature, see Angela Winckler, Das romantische Kind. Ein poetischer Typus von Goethe bis Thomas Mann (Berne: Peter Lang, 2000).Google Scholar
- 4.James R. Kincaid, Erotic Innocence: The Culture of Child Molesting (Durham, NC, and London: Duke University Press, 1998), p. 54.Google Scholar
- 5.See Daniel Pick, Faces of Degeneration: A European Disorder, c.1848—c.1918 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Cited in L. Perry Curtis, Jr., Jack the Ripper and the London Press (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2001), p. 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Ruth Florack, Wedekinds ‘Lulu’. Zerrbild der Sinnlichkeit (Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1995), pp. 37–40.Google Scholar
- 8.Richard von Krafft-Ebing, Psychopathia Sexualis, trans. C. M. Chadwick from the seventh edition (Philadelphia and London: F. A. Davis, 1893), p. 13.Google Scholar
- 11.Otto Weininger, Geschlecht und Charakter (Munich: Matthes and Seitz, 1980), p. 283. Later, however, Weininger implies that mothers, too, are essentially whores (see ibid., p. 312).Google Scholar
- 12.Karl Kraus, ‘Die Büchse der Pandora’, in Literatur als Lüge (Munich: DTV, 1962), pp. 5–15, this quotation p. 14 (my translation). In Kraus’s 1905 production of the play, Wedekind played Jack the Ripper, his future wife Lulu, and Alban Berg was in the audience.Google Scholar
- 13.Simon Winchester, The Alice behind the Wonderland (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), pp. 5–6.Google Scholar
- 15.Patrick McGuinness, Maurice Maeterlinck and the Making of Modern Theatre (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), p. 134.Google Scholar
- 16.Richard A. Kaye, ‘Sexual Identity at the Fin de Siècle’, in Gail Marshall (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Fin de Siècle (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 53–72, this quotation p. 56.Google Scholar
- 17.Oscar Wilde, Salomé, trans. Lord Alfred Douglas, in The Complete Works of Oscar Wilde (Glasgow: HarperCollins, 1994), pp. 583–605, this quotation p. 586.Google Scholar
- 19.Kevin Ohi, Innocence and Rapture: The Erotic Child in Pater, Wilde, James, and Nabokov (New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), p. 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.On virginity and dance, see Adrienne Auslander Munich, ‘What Lily Knew: Virginity in the 1890s’, in Lloyd Davis (ed.), Virginal Sexuality and Textuality in Victorian Literature (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993), pp. 143–58.Google Scholar
- 22.See Anna Katharina Schaffner, ‘Richard von Krafft-Ebing’s Psychopathia Sexualis and Thomas Mann’s Buddenbrooks: Exchanges between Scientific and Imaginary Accounts of Sexual Deviance’, Modern Language Review, 106:2 (2011), 477–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.See John Margetts, ‘Die scheinbar herrenlose Kamera. Zu Thomas Manns Tod in Venedig und der Kunstphotographie von Wilhelm von Gloeden’, Germanischromanische Monatsschrift, 39 (1989), 326–37. Gloeden’s work was exhibited in London in 1893 and in Berlin in 1899.Google Scholar
- 24.For a photograph of Nijinsky in L’Après-midi d’un faune, see Germaine Greer, The Boy (London: Thames and Hudson, 2003), p. 138. That the faun could seem to masturbate was one reason for the scandal provoked by the ballet.Google Scholar
- 26.Frank Wedekind, Die Büchse der Pandora. Eine Monstretragödie, in Frank Wedekind, Werke, 3:1, ed. Hartmut Vinçon (Darmstadt: Häusser, 1996), pp. 145–311, this quotation p. 305 (in English in the original).Google Scholar
- 29.Henry James, The Turn of the Screw (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 2010), p. 7.Google Scholar
- 36.Penelope Reed Doob, The Idea of the Labyrinth from Classical Antiquity through the Middle Ages (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1990), p. 52.Google Scholar
- 37.Sallie Sears, The Negative Imagination: Form and Perspective in the Novels of Henry James (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1968), p. 27.Google Scholar
- 39.Henry James, What Maisie Knew, ed. Christopher Ricks (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 2010), p. 69.Google Scholar
- 46.See Peter Brooks, The Melodramatic Imagination: Balzac, Henry James, Melodrama, and the Mode of Excess (New York: Columbia University Press, 1984), pp. 164–6.Google Scholar
- 49.Anthony Giddens, The Transformation of lntimacy: Sexuality, Love and Eroticism in Modern Societies (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Elizabeth Boa 2012