Ether Machines: Raoul Hausmann’s Optophonetic Media

  • Arndt Niebisch
Chapter

Abstract

In one of the last texts that the Berlin Dadaist Raoul Hausmann published before he left Germany in 1933, ‘Trommelfeuer der Wissenschaft’/Drumfire of Science’, he strongly rejected Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity and promoted the cosmological model of the Austrian engineer Hanns Hörbiger who, in his Glacial Cosmogony, explained cosmic processes based on an interaction of ice and fire in the universe.1 Hausmann’s polemic shows that the artistic avant-garde of the Weimar period was not always in tandem with the scientific avant-garde of the time. In fact, Hausmann’s main aesthetic project, which he called Optophonetics, also stood in stark contrast to Einstein’s revolutionary insights, because it was connected to a theory of the ether.2 In the nineteenth century, ether was assumed as the medium in which light and electromagnetic waves would propagate — a hypothesis that was rejected by the theory of relativity.3 However, the ether and its connection to electromagnetic fields, X-rays, and notions of multidimensional spaces fuelled the imagination of many modernist artists. Linda Henderson showed that painters such as Boccioni, Kupka and Kandinsky were inspired by the ether as a phenomenon that stood at the intersection of scientific and occult understandings of mediality. For these artists, aesthetic expression had the task to display the ethereal, electromagnetic, and multidimensional structure of the world that was not yet accessible to human perception.

Keywords

Sense Perception Central Organ Photo Cell Light Input Modernist Artist 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Biro, Matthew, The Dada Cyborg. Visions of the New Human in Weimar Berlin (Minnesota: Minnesota University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
  2. —, ‘Raoul Hausmann’s Revolutionary Media: Dada Performance, Photomomtage and the Cyborg’, Art History 30(1) (2007): 26–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Borck, Cornelius, ‘Sound Work and Visionary Prosthetics: Artistic Experiments in Raoul Hausmann’, Papers of Surrealism 4 (2005): 1–25.Google Scholar
  4. Blom, Ina, ‘The Touch through Time. Raoul Hausmann, Nam June Paik and the Transmission Technology of the Avant-Garde’, Leonardo 34(3) (2001): 209–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Donguy, Jacques, ‘Machine Head: Raoul Hausmann and the Optophone’, Leonardo 34(3) (2001): 217–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elder, Bruce R., Harmony and Dissent: Film and Avant-Garde Art Movements in the Early Twentieth Century (Waterloo, ON: Wilfried Laurier University Press, 2008).Google Scholar
  7. Engl, Jo, Der tönende Film. Das Triergon-Verfahrenund seine Anwendungsmöglichkeiten (Braunschweig: Vieweg, 1927).Google Scholar
  8. Erlhoff, Michael, Raoul Hausmann, Dadasoph. Versuch einer Politisierung der Ästhetik (Hannover: Zweitschrift, 1982).Google Scholar
  9. Fürst, Artur, Im Bannkreis von Nauen. Die Eroberung der Erde durch die drahtlose Telegraphie (Stuttgart and Berlin: Deutsche Verlagsanstalt, 1922).Google Scholar
  10. Hausmann, Raoul, Scharfrichter der bürgerlichen Seele. Raoul Hausmann in Berlin 1900–1933, edited by Eva Züchner (Berlin: Hatje, 1998).Google Scholar
  11. —, Texte bis 1933, edited by Michael Erlhoff, 2 vols (Munich: Edition Text + Kritik, 1982).Google Scholar
  12. Henderson, Linda Dalrymple, ‘Vibratory Modernism: Boccioni, Kupka, and the Ether of Space’, in From Energy to Information, edited by Bruce Clarke and Linda Dalrymple Henderson (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002), pp. 126–49.Google Scholar
  13. Hübner, Corinna, Raoul Hausmann. Grenzgänger zwischen den Künsten (Bielfeld: Aisthesis, 2003).Google Scholar
  14. Koelsch, Karl, Das spierelige Wesen der Wellen in Anwendung auf Licht und Farben (Hannover: Helwig, 1922).Google Scholar
  15. Lista, Marcella, ‘Raoul Hausmann’s Optophone: “Universal Language” and the Intermedia’, in The Dada Seminars, edited by Leah Dickerman and Matthew S. Witovsky (Washington, DC: National Gallery, 2005), pp. 83–101.Google Scholar
  16. Marcus, Ernst, Ausgewählte Schriften, edited by Gottfried Marin and Gerd Hergenlübe, 2 vols (Bonn: Sonderdruck, 1967 and 1981).Google Scholar
  17. —, Das Problem der excentrischen Empfindung und seine Lösung (Berlin: Sturmverlag, 1918).Google Scholar
  18. McLuhan, Marshall, Understanding Media (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999).Google Scholar
  19. Moholy-Nagy, Lazlo, Painting, Photography, Film (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1969).Google Scholar
  20. Müller, Corinna, Vom Stummfilm zum Tonfilm (Munich: Dilhelm Fink Verlag, 2003).Google Scholar
  21. Mumford, Lewis, Technics and Civilization (San Diego, New York and London: Harcourt Brace, 1963).Google Scholar
  22. Niebisch, Arndt, ‘Polemik des Wissens. Raoul Hausmann liest Albert Einstein’ in Wissen. Erzählen: Narrative der Humanwissenschaft (Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, 2006), pp. 197–206.Google Scholar
  23. Rieger, Stefan, Kybernetische Anthropologie (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag, 2003).Google Scholar
  24. Ruhmer, Ernst, Das Selen und seine Bedeutung für die Elektrotechnik mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der drahtlosen Telephonie (Berlin: F. und M. Harrwitz, 1902).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Arndt Niebisch 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arndt Niebisch

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations