Democratic Supervision of Taiwan-China Agreements: On the ECFA and Beyond

  • Jau-Yuan Hwang


Since Ma Ying-jeou took office on May 20, 2008, he has listed the China policy on top of his administration’s priorities. As of May 10, 2011, the Ma administration has signed 15 agreements and three memorandums of understandings (MOU) with China.1 These agreements opened direct postal links and air and sea transportation across the Taiwan Straits, allowed more Chinese tourists to visit Taiwan, and initiated a variety of cooperation agreements on judicial assistance, financial and banking businesses, agricultural products and food inspection, among others. Of them, the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) is undoubtedly the most important and controversial one.


World Trade Organization Supra Note Dispute Settlement Democratic Progressive Party Executive Yuan 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Chen, Yi-Kai, “On the Cross-Straits Economic Cooperation Committee from the Perspective of International Law”, New Century Foundation Forum, Vol. 53 (2011): 101–104. (in Mandarin)Google Scholar
  2. Chiang, Huang-Chih, “The ECFA Shall Apply the Review Procedure of Treaty”, New Century Foundation Forum, Vol. 51 (2010): 14–16. (in Mandarin)Google Scholar
  3. Chiang, Huang-Chih, & Jau-Yuan Hwang, “On the Statehood of Taiwan: An Legal Appraisal”, in The “One China” Dilemma, ed. Peter Chow (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008), 57–80.Google Scholar
  4. Chou, Chi-An, “A Two-Edged Sword: the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement between the Republic of China and the People’s Republic of China”, Brigham Young University International Law & Management Review, Vol. 6 (2010): 1–20.Google Scholar
  5. Graewert, Tim, “Conflicting Laws and Jurisdictions in the Dispute Settlement Process of Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO”, Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal, Vol. 1, No. 2 (2008): 287–334Google Scholar
  6. Henckels, Caroline, “Overcoming Jurisdictional Isolationism at the WTO — FTA Nexus: A Potential Approach for the WTO”, European Journal of International Law, Vol. 19, No. 3 (2008): 571–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lin, Chiu-Miao, “Cross-Strait Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement: Its Status in International Law and Domestic Congressional Supervision”, Journal of New Perspectives on Law, Vol. 16 (2009): 117–151 (in Mandarin)Google Scholar
  8. Liu, Philip, “Legislature Approves ECFA”, The Taiwan Economic News, August 18, 2010. Accessed April 30, 2011, Scholar
  9. Lo, Chang-fa, International Trade Law, 2nd ed. Angle: Taipei (2010) (in Mandarin)Google Scholar
  10. Turinov, Anna, “Free Trade Agreements in the World Trade Organization: The Experience of East Asia and the Japan-Mexico Economic Partnership Agreement”, UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal, Vol. 25 (2008): 336–364Google Scholar
  11. Wang, Blake Cheng-yu, “The Current Status and Future of the Cross-Straits Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement”, Taiwan Law Review, Vol. 189 (2011): 115–142 (in Mandarin)Google Scholar
  12. Wang, Dominique T. C., and Chia-Hua Liu, “The Formal Structure and Substantive Contents of the Cross-Straits Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA)”, Taiwan Law Review, Vol. 169 (2009): 186–199 (in Mandarin).Google Scholar
  13. Wu, Ching-Shui, “Congressional Supervision on Cross-Strait Agreement”, Journal of New Perspectives on Law, Vol. 26 (2010): 105–135 (in Mandarin)Google Scholar
  14. Yang, Connie Guang-Hwa, Collection of Essays on International Economic and Financial Laws. Taipei: National Chengchi University (2009).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Peter C. Y. Chow 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jau-Yuan Hwang

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations