Abstract

Interrogator Gletkin, Arthur Koestler’s infamous OGPU (Ob”edinennoe gosudarstvennoe politicheskoe upravlenie)creation, informed Rubashov, Koestler’s Bukharin, about police relations with peasants: “In all other countries, the peasants had one or two hundred years to develop the habit of industrial precision and the handling of machines. Here they only had ten years. If we didn’t sack them and shoot them for every trifle, the whole country would come to a standstill, and the peasants would lie down to sleep in the factory yards until grass grew out of the chimneys and everything became as it was before.”1 Gletkin remains the archetypical political policeman, a symbol of arbitrariness and brutality that proved to many that the Bolshevik Revolution stood for little more than deceit and cant. But just as our vision of the peasantry on the eve of revolution has undergone a serious critique by such investigators as Teodor Shanin,2 political police-peasant relations in the pre-Stalinist years of the Soviet Union deserve much fuller treatment than we have had to date.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Arthur Koestier, Darkness at Noon (New York: The Macmillan Company, 1941), 183.Google Scholar
  2. 5.
    Edward Hallett Carr, Socialism in One Country, 1924–1926(New York: Macmillan, 1958), 2: 362.Google Scholar
  3. 6.
    Paul Hagenloh, Stalin’s Police: Public Order and Mass Repression in the USSR, 1926–1941 (Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press; and Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
  4. 7.
    Tracy McDonald, “A Peasant Rebellion in Stalin’s Russia: The Pitelinskii Uprising, Riazan 1930,” Journal of Social History 35, no. 1 (2001): 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 8.
    Merle Fainsod, Smolensk under Soviet Rule (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1958), 156; Volodomyr Semystiaha, “The Role and Place of Secret Collaborators in the Informational Activity of the GPU-NKVD in the 1920s and 1930s,” Cahiers du Monde russe 42, nos. 2–4 (2001): 237–238.Google Scholar
  6. 9.
    Peter Holquist, “‘Information Is the Alpha and Omega of Our Work’: Bolshevik Surveillance in Its Pan-European Context,” The Journal of Modern History 69, no. 3 (1997): 415–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Hugh D. Hudson, Jr. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hugh D. HudsonJr.

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations