Introduction: Applied Ethics, Human Security, and the War on Terrorism
Abstract
On September 11, 2001, nineteen men hijacked four passenger jets to carry out attacks that killed more than 3,000 people in the United States, demonstrating the vulnerability of powerful nations to massive attacks by groups of violent extremists. This shocking example of “asymmetric warfare” between powerful nations and adversaries unwilling to confront them directly served as a warning that national security had to be reexamined and an effective, multilateral antiterrorism strategy made a top priority. However, rather than waiting for a full accounting of facts and for debate of dissenting views, in the “global war on terrorism” (GWOT) the U.S.-led coalition has fought violence with more violence and terrorism with massive state terrorism.
Keywords
National Security Human Security Powerful Nation Information Warfare Lethal ForcePreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
- 1.Heidi Ross, “Rethinking Human Vulnerability, Security, and Connection Through Relational Theorizing,” in Comparative Education, Terrorism, and Human Security: From Critical Pedagogy to Peacebuilding, ed. Wayne Nelles (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003), 38–39.Google Scholar
- 2.Richard Jackson, Writing the War on Terrorism: Language, Politics and Counter-terrorism (New York: Manchester University Press, 2007), 8–9.Google Scholar
- 15.Laurie Calhoun, “Just War? Moral Soldiers?,” The Independent Review IV.3 (2000): 325.Google Scholar