Advertisement

Abstract

The Portuguese régime change from dictatorship to democracy, set in motion by the April 1974 military coup and finalized with the 1982 and 1989 constitutional amendments, offers clues for answering contested questions about transitions to democracy. Among those questions are the following: Are there socio-economic prerequisites for democracy? What conditions facilitate subordination of the military to the new democracy’s civilian authorities? Who are the parties to the agreement a democratic constitution represents? What is the relationship between market economy and democracy? What works best in new democracies: parliamentarism or presidentialism?

Keywords

Prime Minister Presidential Election Party System Democratic Transition Constitutional Amendment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    David Birmingham, A Concise History of Portugal (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    On the First Republic see Douglas L. Wheeler, Republican Portugal: A Political History, 1910–1926 (Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1978);Google Scholar
  3. R. A. H. Robinson, Contemporary Portugal. A History (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1979).Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    Lawrence S. Graham, The Portuguese Military and the State: Rethinking Transitions in Europe and Latin America (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993);Google Scholar
  5. Paul Christopher Manuel, Uncertain Outcome. The Politics of the Portuguese Transition to Democracy (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1995);Google Scholar
  6. Kenneth Maxwell, The Making of Portuguese Democracy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Walter C. Opello Jr., Portugal: From Monarchy to Pluralist Democracy (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1991); Robinson, Contemporary Portugal;Google Scholar
  8. Paul Christopher Manuel, “Portuguese Civil Society under Dictatorship and Democracy, 1910–1996,” in Perspectives on Political Science, vol. 27, no. 3 (1998): p. 142 ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 5.
    Carlos Cunha, The Portuguese Communist Party’s Strategy for Power, 1921–1986 (New York & London: Garland Publishing, 1992).Google Scholar
  10. 8.
    On the revolutionary period and subsequent reaction, see Nancy Bermeo, The Revolution within the Revolution. Workers’ Control in Rural Portugal (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986);Google Scholar
  11. Martin Kayman, Revolution and Counter Revolution in Portugal (London & Wolfeboro, NH: Merlin Press, 1987);Google Scholar
  12. Phil Mailer, Portugal: The Impossible Revolution? (Montréal: Black Rose Books, 1977);Google Scholar
  13. Audrey Wise, Eyewitness in Revolutionary Portugal (Nottingham: Spokesman Books, 1975); Cunha, Portuguese Communist Party; Manuel, Uncertain Outcomes; Maxwell, Making of Portuguese Democracy; Opello, Portugal; Robinson, Contemporary Portugal. Google Scholar
  14. 10.
    On foreign support for one or the other of the main Portuguese protagonists, see the memoirs of the British Foreign Secretary: James Callahan, Time and Chance (London: Collins, 1987). See also: Rainer Eisfeld, “Influencias Externas sobre a Revolução Portuguesa: O Papel da Europa Ocidental,” in EduardoGoogle Scholar
  15. de Sousa Ferreira & Walter C. Opello Jr., eds., Conflitos e Mudanças em Portugal, 1974–1984 (Lisbon: Editorial Teorema, 1985), p. 79–99.Google Scholar
  16. 11.
    Hugo Gil Ferreira & Michael W. Marshall, Portugal’s Revolution: Te n Years On (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986), p. 46.Google Scholar
  17. 12.
    Cesar Oliveira, “Transiçao e Consolidaçao da Democracia em Portugal,” in Pensamiento Iberoamericano, no. 14 (1988): p. 300; Maxwell, Making of Portuguese Democracy, p. 112–113. Be it noted that the PCP’s popularity has not increased in the intervening two decades. In the most recent parliamentary elections, held in 1995, the communists, in alliance with the Portuguese Greens, pulled less than 10 percent of the popular vote. See Agora’s Elections Around the World website, http://www.agora.stm.it/elections/election/country/pt.htm.Google Scholar
  18. 14.
    On the politics of Portuguese constitution-making, see the collection of essays in Kenneth R. Maxwell & Scott C. Monje, eds., Portugal: The Constitution and the Consolidation of Democracy, 1976–1989 (New York: Columbia University, Camoes Center Special Report No. 2, 1990).Google Scholar
  19. 15.
    On the political struggles between the two branches, see David Corkill, “The Political System and the Consolidation of Democracy in Portugal,” in Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 46, no. 4 (1993): p. 517–533;Google Scholar
  20. David Corkill, “The Portuguese Presidential Election of 13 January 1991,” in West European Politics, vol. 14, no. 4 (1991): p. 185–192;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Francisco Pinto Balsemao, “The Constitution and Politics: Options for the Future,” in Kenneth Maxwell, ed., Portugal in the 1980s: Dilemmas of Democratic Consolidation (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1986), p. 197–232;Google Scholar
  22. Carlos Gaspar, “O Proceso Constitucional e a Estabilidade do Regime,” Analise Social, vol. XXV, no. 1–2 (1990): p. 9–29. Graham, Portuguese Military; Maxwell & Monje, Portugal: the Constitution; Oliveira, Tranciçao. Google Scholar
  23. 16.
    Samuel p. Huntington, “Democracy’s Third Wave,” in Journal of Democracy, vol. 2, no. 2 (1991): p. 12–34;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Seymour Martin Lipset, “The Social Requisites of Democracy Revisited,” in American Sociological Review, vol. 59, no. 1 (1994): p. 1–22;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Deane E. Neubauer, “Some Conditions of Democracy,” in American Political Science Review, vol. 61 (1967): p. 1002–1009; Walter F. Murphy, “Constitutional Democracy,” photocopy, 1996. The Murphy photocopy is the syllabus for a National Endowment for the Humanities Summer Seminar for College Teachers, which he directed at Princeton University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 17.
    Giuseppe Di Palma, To Craft Democracies (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990).Google Scholar
  27. 18.
    Manuel, Uncertain Outcome, p. 3; Giulio Sapelli, Southern Europe since 1945. Tradition and Modernity in Portugal, Spain, Italy, Greece and Turkey (London: Longman, 1995).Google Scholar
  28. 21.
    Joaquim Aguiar, “The Hidden Fluidity in an Ultra-Stable Party System,” in Ferreira & Opello, Conflitos e Mudanças, p. 101–127. See also Daniel Nataf, Democratization and Social Settlements. The Politics of Change in Contemporary Portugal (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995).Google Scholar
  29. 24.
    Jon Elster, “The Necessity and Impossibility of Simultaneous Economic and Political Reform,” in Douglas Greenberg, Stanley N. Katz et alia, eds., Constitutionalism and Democracy. Transitions in the Contemporary World (New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1993), p. 267–274.Google Scholar
  30. 26.
    For forceful arguments against presidentialism see: Juan Linz, “The Perils of Presidentialism,” in Journal of Democracy, vol. 1, no. 1 (1990): p. 51–69;Google Scholar
  31. Arturo Valenzuela, “The Crisis of Presidentialism,” in Journal of Democracy, vol. 4, no. 4 (1993): p. 3–16. Lipset, Social Requisites, doubts that the case for pres-identialism is all that strong.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 27.
    Adam Przeworski et alia, “What Makes Democracy Endure?” in Journal of Democracy, vol. 7, no. 1 (1996): p. 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 28.
    Arend Lijphart, Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Marco Rimanelli 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alfred G. Cuzán

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations