Corporate Governance and Ownership Concentration on the Budapest Stock Exchange
Abstract
The importance of good corporate governance has only recently been recognized in Hungary and efforts to implement modern structures have been slow. Moreover, it has been an ‘imported product,’ not a result of endogenous evolution. The lack of organic development in Hungary is understandable given the history of central planning up to 1990. During the subsequent ten-year transition period all the essential features of a well-functioning market economy were established. Notwithstanding this, strong corporate governance was treated as a low priority ingredient in the newly created capitalist institutions. The updated Company Law contained the necessary prescriptions for the formal corporate governance structures but for closely held private Hungarian companies — the dominant form of those domestically owned — the structures remain more or less an empty shell.
Keywords
Corporate Governance Institutional Investor Pension Fund Minority Shareholder Supervisory BoardPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
- Becht, M. & Mayer C, ‘Introduction’, in Barca, Fabrizio,& Marco Becht (eds), The Control of Corporate Europe (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
- Berglöf, E. & Ciaessens, S., ‘Corporate Governance and Enforcement’, Paper prepared for the Global Corporate Governance Forum, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Czajlik, I. & Vincze, J., ‘Corporate Law and Corporate Governance — the Hungarian Experience’, Discussion Paper MT-DP 2004/11, Budapest, Institute of Economics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 2004.Google Scholar
- Earle, J. S., Kucsera, C, & Telegdy, A., ‘Ownership Concentration and Corporate Performance on the Budapest Stock Exchange: Do too Many Cooks Spoil the Goulash?’, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13, 2005, pp. 254–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R.W., ‘Legal Determinants of External Finance’, Journal of Finance, 52, 1997, pp. 1131–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R.W., ‘Law and Finance’, Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1998, pp. 1113–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F. & Shleifer A., ‘Corporate Ownership around the World’, Journal of Finance, 54, 1999.Google Scholar
- Lins, K. V., ‘Equity Ownership and Firm Value in Emerging Markets’, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38, 2003, pp. 159–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pistor, K., Raiser, M. & Geifer, S., ‘Law and Finance in Transition Economies’, Working Paper No. 49, Center for International Development, Harvard University, 2000 (reprinted in Economics of Transition, 8, 2000, pp. 325–68).Google Scholar
- ‘Report on the Observance of Standards and Codes (ROSC)’, Corporate Governance Country Assessment, Hungary, World Bank, February 2003. (available at: http://www.worldbank.org/ifa/rosc_huncg.pdf//ifa/rosc_huncg.pdf/)Google Scholar
- Torok, A., ‘Corporate Governance in the Transition — the Case of Hungary’, in L. Halpern & C. Wyplosz (eds), Hungary: Towards a Market Economy (Cambridge, University Press and Centre for Economic Policy Research, 1998).Google Scholar