The Reformation and the Radical Attitude: Luther, Müntzer and Calvin

  • Jason Edwards

Abstract

In the introduction we mentioned the role played by theological discourse in the formation of some of the central concepts of modern political theory. In this regard, the intellectual and political landscape crafted in the European Reformation of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries is crucial. The challenge posed to the Roman Catholic Church by the various Protestant reform movements was not simply theological in character. In the early sixteenth century the Catholic Church still played a central role in Europe, acting as the main force for unity and pacification among the diverse and competing forms of political authority that characterised the late medieval and early modern period. Historically, however, the Church had also promoted division, most famously in the Great Schism of 1054 between the Roman and Eastern Orthodox churches and on a number of occasions in medieval Europe when kings and princes contested the papacy’s claims to secular authority. The challenge that was mounted to the Roman Church in the early sixteenth century, then, was not of itself remarkable. The consequences of the Protestant challenge were, however, of incalculable importance for the formation of the modern political system in the West and for the character of modern political theory.

Keywords

Radical Attitude Public Power Christian Community Theological Discourse Christian Life 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Q. Skinner, TheFoundations of ModernPoliticalThought, vol. 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978), pp. 3–12.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ibid., pp. 23–4.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Luther, ‘On the Freedom of a Christian’, in Luthers Works, vol. 31 (Philadelphia, PA: Fortress Press, 1957).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ibid., p. 345.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ibid., p. 346.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ibid., pp. 349–50.Google Scholar
  7. 14.
    M. Luther, ‘To the Christian Nobility of the German Nation’, in Luthers Works, vol. 44 (1966), p. 129.Google Scholar
  8. 15.
    Ibid., p. 131.Google Scholar
  9. 16.
    M. Luther, ‘Temporal Authority: To What Extent it Should be Obeyed’, in Luthers Works, vol. 45 (1962), p. 89.Google Scholar
  10. 17.
    Ibid., p. 90.Google Scholar
  11. 18.
    Ibid., p. 91.Google Scholar
  12. 19.
    Ibid., p. 95.Google Scholar
  13. 20.
    Ibid., pp. 111, 107.Google Scholar
  14. 21.
    Ibid., p. 112.Google Scholar
  15. 22.
  16. 23.
    M. Luther, ‘Admonition to Peace, A Reply to the Twelve Articles of the Peasants in Swabia’, in Luthers Works, vol. 46 (1967).Google Scholar
  17. 24.
    M. Luther, ‘Against the Robbing and Murdering Hordes of Peasants’, in Luthers Works, vol. 46 (1967), pp. 51–2.Google Scholar
  18. 25.
    M. Luther, ‘Whether Soldiers Too Can Be Saved’, in Luthers Works, vol. 46 (1967), p. 96.Google Scholar
  19. 26.
    H. Hopfl, Introduction to Luther and Calvin On Secular Authority (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), p. x.Google Scholar
  20. 28.
    W. A. Mueller, Church and State in Luther and Calvin: A Comparative Study (New York: Anchor Books, 1954), ch. 3.Google Scholar
  21. 29.
    The older Luther was intolerant of other faiths, most notably Judaism and Islam. His notoriously anti-semitic ‘On The Jews and their Lies’ recommends the burning of synagogues, the razing of Jewish houses and, ultimately, the expulsion of Jews from German lands. M. Luther, ‘On the Jews and their Lies’, in Luthers Works, vol. 47 (1971).Google Scholar
  22. 30.
    G. H. Williams, The Radical Reformation (Philadelphia, PA: The Westminster Press, 1965).Google Scholar
  23. 31.
    Ibid., ch. 13.Google Scholar
  24. 33.
    See F. F.ngels, The Peasant War in Germany (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1926).Google Scholar
  25. 34.
    H. Loewen, Luther and the Radicals (Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfrid Laurier University, 1974), p. 51.Google Scholar
  26. 35.
    Ibid., p. 53.Google Scholar
  27. 36.
    T. Miintzer, ‘The Prague Protest’, in M. G. Baylor ed., The Radical Reformation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), p. 10.Google Scholar
  28. 38.
    T. Muntzer, ‘Sermon to the Princes’, in Baylor ed., The Radical Reformation, pp. 25, 30.Google Scholar
  29. 39.
    T. Miintzer, ‘A Highly Provoked Defence’, in Baylor ed., The Radical Reformation, p. 80.Google Scholar
  30. 40.
    Ibid., p. 81.Google Scholar
  31. 47.
    H.-J. Goertz, Thomas Muntzer: Apocalyptic Mystic and Revolutionary, trans. Jocelyn Jaquiery (Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1993), p. 206.Google Scholar
  32. 48.
    M. Luther, ‘Dr. Martin Luther’s Warning to His Dear German People’, in Luthers Works, vol. 47 (1971), p. 30.Google Scholar
  33. 49.
    Ibid., p. 55.Google Scholar
  34. 50.
    See R. S. Wallace, Calvin, Geneva and the Reformation (Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press, 1990).Google Scholar
  35. 51.
    S. Wolin, Politics and Vision: Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004), p. 150.Google Scholar
  36. 52.
    A. E. McGrath, A Life o f John Calvin: A Study in the Shaping of Western Culture (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990), pp. 85–6.Google Scholar
  37. 53.
    Ibid., pp. 95–6.Google Scholar
  38. 54.
    Ibid., pp. 98–9.Google Scholar
  39. 55.
    Ibid., pp. 109–10.Google Scholar
  40. 59.
    M. Walzer, The Revolution of the Saints (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1966).Google Scholar
  41. 60.
    Skinner, The Foundations of Modern Political Thought, vol. 2, p. 323. Walzer also reduces Calvinism to ‘ideology’ in the sense of a psychological means of justifying the interests of its believers. This overlooks the importance of Calvinism as a belief system in shaping the interests of its believers according to its theological content. See R. C. Hancock, Calvin and the Foundations of Modem Politics (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 1989), p. 13.Google Scholar
  42. 61.
    J. Calvin, ‘Civil Government’, in Institutes of the Christian Religion, vol. II, ch. XX (Library of Christian Classics, vol. XXI), trans. F. L. Battles (Philadelphia, PA: Westminster Press, 1960), pp. 1485–6.Google Scholar
  43. 62.
    Ibid., p. 1486.Google Scholar
  44. 63.
    Ibid., p. 1487.Google Scholar
  45. 64.
    Ibid., p. 1488.Google Scholar
  46. 65.
    Ibid., pp. 1489–90.Google Scholar
  47. 66.
    Ibid., p. 1511.Google Scholar
  48. 67.
    Ibid., p. 1512.Google Scholar
  49. 68.
    Ibid., p. 1517.Google Scholar
  50. 69.
    Ibid., p. 1521.Google Scholar
  51. 70.
    Ibid., p. 1519.Google Scholar
  52. 72.
    M. Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, trans. T. Parsons (London: Routledge, 1992).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Jason Edwards 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jason Edwards
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Politics and SociologyLondonUK

Personalised recommendations