Decline and Fall

  • Stewart Candlish
Part of the History of Analytic Philosophy book series (History of Analytic Philosophy)

Abstract

A very learned philosopher once said to me that he was puzzled by the fact that arguments which seemed absolutely compelling to one generation of philosophers were often found utterly unconvincing by another. It was clear that he did not think it sufficient explanation to talk about, for example, the problems posed by translation, by meaning shifts, by obscurity and so on. This short, and admittedly inconclusive, concluding chapter begins from the sense that we should take this puzzlement seriously. Those who are already convinced that we should not, who think perhaps that philosophy is decided on the arguments alone, at least in their own case, are advised to read no further.

Keywords

True Place Metaphysical View Conclusive Argument British Imperialism Mate Metaphysic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 3.
    These articles, originally published in 1925 and 1939 respectively, were reprinted in G.E. Moore, [hilosophical Papers (London: Allen & Un win, 1959).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Stewart Candlish 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stewart Candlish
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of Western AustraliaAustralia

Personalised recommendations