Introduction

  • Nigel J. Ashton
Chapter
Part of the Contemporary History in Context book series (CHIC)

Abstract

It was not a promising beginning. Despite the best-laid plans, Prime Minister Harold Macmillan’s first meeting with the new president of the United States, John F. Kennedy did not take place in Washington during the first week of April 1961. Instead, responding to what amounted to a summons from Kennedy at the end of March, the aged prime minister flew to the US Naval Base at Key West in Florida. This detour, involving two five-hour flights in the middle of a planned trip to the Caribbean, was, as Macmillan’s press secretary Harold Evans put it, like flying to Moscow for lunch.1 Across the perspective of four decades, the reason for this hasty change in plans seems somewhat improbable. A civil war between communist and Western-backed forces in the land-locked South East Asian state of Laos had, in Kennedy’s estimation, raised issues vital to the waging of the Cold War. Not only that, but from the new president’s point of view, the prime minister’s attempts to wriggle out of any British military commitment to stem the communist advance in Laos threatened a ‘serious difference of opinion between the United Kingdom and the United States …’2

Keywords

Prime Minister Foreign Policy Domestic Politics Labour Leader American Relation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Evans, H., Downing Street Diaries: The Macmillan Years, 1957–1963 ( London: Hodder Sr Stoughton, 1981 ), pp. 144–5;Google Scholar
  2. Macmillan, H., Pointing the Way, 1959–1961 ( London: Macmillan — now Palgrave Macmillan, 1972 ), p. 335. In his diary, Macmillan noted that the president had spoken of a two-hour flight, but he had forgotten the long detour necessary to avoid Cuban airspace (HMD, 26 March 1961, dep.d.41, p. 99).Google Scholar
  3. 13.
    Macmillan, Pointing the Way, p. 336; Horne, A., Macmillan, 1957–1986 ( London: Macmillan, 1989 ), p. 292; HMD, 26 March 1961, dep.d.41, p. 101.Google Scholar
  4. 17.
    Stevenson, C., A., The End of Nowhere: American Policy Toward Laos Since 1954 ( Boston: Beacon Press, 1972 ), p. 147.Google Scholar
  5. 24.
    For discussion of Anglo-American relations over Indochina up to 1954 see: Ruane, K., ‘Anthony Eden, British Diplomacy and the Origins of the Geneva Conference, 1954’, The Historical Journal, Vol. 37, No. 1, 1994, Ruane, “‘Containing America”: Aspects of British Foreign Policy and the Cold War in South-East Asia, 1951–54’, Diplomacy and Statecraft, Vol. 7, No. 1, 1996, Ruane, ‘Refusing to Pay the Price: British Foreign Policy and the Pursuit of Victory in Vietnam, 1952–4’, English Historical Review, Vol. CX, No. 435, 1995; Warner, G., ‘The Settlement of the Indochina War’ in Young, J. W., (ed.) The Foreign Policy of Winston Churchill’s Peacetime Administration, 1951–1955 ( Leicester: Leicester University Press, 1988 );Google Scholar
  6. Cable, J., The Geneva Conference on Indochina ( London: Macmillan — now Palgrave Macmillan, 1986 ).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 26.
    Quoted in Reynolds, D., ‘Rethinking Anglo-American Relations’, International Affairs, Vol. 65, No. 1, Winter 1988–9, p. 94.Google Scholar
  8. 28.
    Reynolds, D., The Creation of the Anglo-American Alliance, 1937–41: A Study in Competitive Cooperation ( London: Europa, 1981 );Google Scholar
  9. Hathaway, R. M., Ambiguous Partnership: Britain and America, 1944–1947 ( New York: Columbia University Press, 1981 );Google Scholar
  10. Thorne, C., Allies of a Kind: The United States, Britain and the War Against Japan, 1941–1945 ( London: Hamish Hamilton, 1978 ).Google Scholar
  11. 29.
    Danchev, A., ‘Special Pleading’ in Burk, K., and Stokes, M., The United States and the European Alliance since 1945 ( Oxford: Berg, 1999 ), pp. 272–3.Google Scholar
  12. 31.
    Watt, D., ‘Introduction: The Anglo-American relationship’, in Louis, W. R., and Bull, H. (eds) The Special Relationship ( Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986 ), p. 4.Google Scholar
  13. 32.
    Crossman quoted in Sampson, A., Macmillan: A Study in Ambiguity ( London: Allen Lane The Penguin Press, 1967 ), p. 61.Google Scholar
  14. 34.
    Edmonds, R., Setting the Mould: The United States and Britain, 1945–1950 ( Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986 ), endnote 1, p. 319.Google Scholar
  15. 39.
    Quoted in Dimbleby, D., and Reynolds, D., An Ocean Apart: The Relationship Between Britain and America in the Twentieth Century ( London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1988 ), p. 138.Google Scholar
  16. 41.
    For a broader attempt to analyse US Cold War alliance relations in terms of gender see Costigliola, F., ‘The Nuclear Family: Tropes of Gender and Pathology in the Western Alliance’, Diplomatic History, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1997, pp. 163–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 44.
    For an analysis of McNamara as the Cold War manager see Twing, S. W., Myths, Models and US Foreign Policy: The Cultural Shaping of Three Cold Warriors ( London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1998 ), pp. 39–44, 145–85.Google Scholar
  18. Shapley, D., Promise and Power: The Life and Times of Robert McNamara (Boston: Little, Brown, 1993 ) offers a broader biographical account.Google Scholar
  19. 45.
    Neustadt, R. E., Report to JFK: The Skybolt Crisis in Perspective ( Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1999 ), p. 136.Google Scholar
  20. 46.
    Gearson, J. P. S., Harold Macmillan and the Berlin Wall Crisis, 1958–62: The Limits of Interest and Force ( Basingstoke: Macmillan–now Palgrave Macmillan, 1998 ), pp. 26–30;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brivati, B., Hugh Gaitskell ( London: Richard Cohen Books, 1997 ), pp. 314–17.Google Scholar
  22. 47.
    Macmillan, H., At the End of the Day ( London: Macmillan — now Palgrave Macmillan, 1973 ), p. 481.Google Scholar
  23. 51.
    See for example Aldous, R., ‘A Family Affair: Macmillan and the Art of Personal Diplomacy’, in Aldous, R., and Lee, S., Harold Macmillan and Britain’s World Role ( Basingstoke: Macmillan — now Palgrave Macmillan, 1996 ).Google Scholar
  24. 52.
    For the two most prominent sympathetic accounts of the Kennedy presidency written in the aftermath of his assassination see Schlesinger, A. M., Jr, A Thousand Days: John F. Kennedy in the White House (New York: Fawcett Crest, 1967)Google Scholar
  25. Sorenson, T. C., Kennedy ( London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1965 ).Google Scholar
  26. For Kennedy character assassinations see Hersh, S., The Dark Side of Camelot (London: HarperCollins, 1998)Google Scholar
  27. Reeves, T. C., A Question of Character: A Life of John F. Kennedy ( London: Arrow Books, 1992 ).Google Scholar
  28. 55.
    For a flavour of the realist case see Firestone, B. J., ‘Kennedy and the Test Ban: Presidential Leadership and Arms Control’, in Brinkley, D., and Griffiths, R. T., President Kennedy and Europe ( Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1999 ), pp. 75–6.Google Scholar
  29. 56.
    Quoted in Reeves, R., President Kennedy: Profile of Power ( New York: Simon and Schuster, 1993 ), pp. 36–7.Google Scholar
  30. 59.
    Westad, O. A., ‘The New International History of the Cold War: Three (Possible) Paradigms’, Diplomatic History, Vol. 24, No. 4, Fall 2000, pp. 552–3. Records of the Vienna debates are in Foreign Relations of the United States (hereafter FRUS), 1961–63, Vol. V (Washington: United States Government Printing Office, 1998), pp. 172–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 67.
    The two other candidates for inclusion in this list of colonial controversies are the question of the financing of the Upper Volta Dam in Ghana, which rose to prominence during the final months of 1961, and the Indonesian threat to the Federation of Malaysia, which became a significant concern at the end of the Macmillan premiership. However, as David Shields acknowledges in his discussion of the Upper Volta Dam question, the Congo crisis was undoubtedly the key concern in Anglo-American relations over Africa, next to which Ghana ranks in his estimation as ‘relatively obscure’ (The Impact of the Kennedy/Macmillan Relationship on the Making of Anglo-American Foreign Policies, 1961–1963: Five Case Studies, University of London, PhD Thesis, 1998, p. 168). With regard to the Malaysian-Indonesian confrontation, although this gained some high-level attention during the final months of Macmillan’s premiership, the topic can only satisfactorily be treated through a consideration of the whole of the period up to 1965, which goes well beyond the scope of this study. For detailed discussion see Jones, M., Conflict and Confrontation in South East Asia, 1961–1965: Britain, the United States, Indonesia and the Creation of Malaysia ( Cambridge: CUP, 2002 );Google Scholar
  32. Subritsky, J., Confronting Sukarno: British, American, Australian and New Zealand Diplomacy in the Malaysian-Indonesian Confrontation, 1961–5 ( Basingstoke: Macmillan — now Palgrave Macmillan, 1999 ).Google Scholar
  33. 68.
    Stephen Rabe (The Most Dangerous Area in the World: John F. Kennedy Confronts Communist Revolution in Latin America (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1999), p. 91), calls the debate over British Guiana at the Birch Grove summit of June 1963 one of the most extraordinary exchanges of views during the history of the Cold War’.Google Scholar
  34. 75.
    Britain’s total defence expenditure in 1963 stood at $5.2 billion as against $ 52.2 billion on the part of the United States (Kennedy, P., The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000 ( London: Unwin Hyman, 1988 ), p. 384 ).Google Scholar
  35. 79.
    For further discussion of the role of officials in British policy-making see Deighton, A., ‘British Foreign Policy-Making: the Macmillan Years’, in Kaiser, W., and Staerck, G., British Foreign Policy, 1955–64: Contracting Options ( Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000 ), pp. 9–13.Google Scholar
  36. 80.
    Dickie, J., ’Special’ No More: Anglo-American Relations: Rhetoric and Reality ( London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1994 ), pp. 105–10.Google Scholar
  37. 81.
    May, E. R., and Zelikow, P. D., The Kennedy Tapes: Inside the_White House During the Cuban Missile Crisis ( Cambridge, Mass: The Belnap Press of Harvard University Press, 1997 ), pp. 396–7.Google Scholar
  38. 83.
    Ashton, N. J., Eisenhower, Macmillan and the Problem of Nasser: Anglo-American Relations and Arab Nationalism, 1955–59 ( Basingstoke: Macmillan–now Palgrave Macmillan, 1996 ), pp. 150–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 98.
    For a useful broader study of relations between the United States and the Labour Party that offers some insights for the Kennedy years see Jones, P., America and the British Labour Party: The ‘Special Relationship’ at Work ( London: I. B. Tauris, 1997 ).Google Scholar
  40. 107.
    Schlesinger, A. M., Jr. Robert Kennedy and His Times ( London: André Deutsch Ltd, 1978 ), p. 702.Google Scholar
  41. 114.
    Lewis, G., Lord Hailsham: A Life ( London: Jonathan Cape, 1997 ), p. 187.Google Scholar
  42. 115.
    Hathaway, R. M., Great Britain and the United States: Special Relations Since World War II ( Boston: Twayne Publishers, 1990 ), pp. 56–8.Google Scholar
  43. 116.
    Williams, F., The American Invasion ( London: Anthony Blond, 1962 ), p. 11, quoted in Dimbleby and Reynolds, An Ocean Apart, p. 276.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Nigel Ashton 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nigel J. Ashton
    • 1
  1. 1.London School of EconomicsUK

Personalised recommendations