Russian Political Capitalism and its Environment

  • Philip Hanson
  • Elizabeth Teague
Part of the Studies in Economic Transition book series (SET)

Abstract

There are two main arguments in this chapter. First, the indicators putting the Russian economy in the liberal market economy category mask an economic role for the state that is much greater than that in established market economies of any kind. We are not putting forward a normative argument, that Russia should become a liberal market economy. What we are saying is that the Varieties of Capitalism approach is not helpful in understanding systemic developments in Russia: it has been developed on the basis of a set of criteria that, when applied to Russia, produce a misleading picture. We believe Russia can be more easily understood as an example of Weberian political capitalism. This might change in time, and Russian economic institutions might eventually be classifiable in ways that fit established capitalist societies.

Keywords

Foreign Direct Investment Russian State Business Confidence Liberal Market Economy Russian Business 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adachi, Y. (2006) ‘Ambiguous Effects of Russian Corporate Governance Abuses of the 1990s’, forthcoming in Post-Soviet Affairs, 22, 1, 65–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Duverger, M. (1992) ‘A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government’, in Arend Lijphart (ed.), Parliamentary versus Presidential Government (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  3. Gaidar, E. (2003) State and Evolution: Russia’s Search for a Free Market (Seattle: University of Washington Press).Google Scholar
  4. Gorshankov, D. and D. Kabalinskii (2005) ‘Kak nam rasti dal’she?’, Ekspert, 10 October.Google Scholar
  5. Hanson, P. and E. Teague (2005) ‘Big Business and the State in Russia’, Europe-Asia Studies, 57, 657–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hill, F. (2004) Energy Empire: Oil, Gas and Russia’s Revival (London: Foreign Policy Centre).Google Scholar
  7. Ivanenko, V. (2005) Markets and Democracy in Russia (Helsinki: Bank of Finland) Discussion Papers, No. 16.Google Scholar
  8. Kontorovich, V. (2005) ‘Small Business and Putin’s Federal Reform’, in P. Reddaway and R. W. Orttung (eds), The Dynamics of Russian Politics: Putin’s Reform of Federal-Regional Relations, Vol. II (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield), 241–67.Google Scholar
  9. Lucey, B.M. and S. Voronkova (2005) Russian Equity Market Linkages before and after the 1998 Crisis: Evidence from Time-Varying and Stochastic Cointegration Tests, Helsinki: BOFIT Discussion Papers No. 12.Google Scholar
  10. OADB (2005) ‘RUSSIA: Government reconsiders oil taxes’, Oxford Analytica Daily Brief, 3 October.Google Scholar
  11. OECD (2004) Economic Survey of the Russian Federation (Paris: OECD).Google Scholar
  12. Tabata, S. (2006) ‘Observations on the Influence of High Oil Prices on Russia’s GDP Growth’, Eurasian Geography and Economics, 47, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  13. Yasin, E.G. (2005a) Prizhivetsya li demokratiya v Rossii (Moscow: Novoe izdatel’stvo).Google Scholar
  14. Yasin, E.G. (2005b) ‘Polozhenie rossiiskoi ekonomiki v kontekste proshlogo i budushchego’, text of talk delivered at the University of Birmingham European Research Institute, 14 July.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Philip Hanson and Elizabeth Teague 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip Hanson
  • Elizabeth Teague

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations