Advances in Risk Management pp 191-212 | Cite as
Model Risk and Financial Derivatives
Abstract
Since the introduction of option trading in Chicago in 1973, derivatives have shaped the evolution of capital markets by allowing efficient risk unbundling and transfer. Financial intermediaries immediately recognized that derivatives were the perfect tool to customize state-contingent payoffs for both speculators and hedgers alike. Consequently, the volume and various types of derivative contracts traded on organized exchanges as well as in over the counter markets have grown steadily. The catalysts of this success were the development of financial theory and sophisticated pricing mathematical models, the availability of real-time information, the technological innovation (in particular increasingly powerful computers) as well as the move from open-outcry trading to electronic trading. Today, we have reached the point where derivatives have become an essential feature of practically any financial contract. They have changed the way companies and individuals make investments, raise capital, and even measure, manage and understand risk.
Keywords
Model Risk Option Price Hedge Fund Implied Volatility Underlying AssetPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Bachelier, L. (1900) “Theorie de la Speculation” (Thesis), Annales Scientifiques de l’École Normale Superieure, III-17: 21–86. [Cootner (ed.) (1964) Random Character of Stock Market Prices, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, pp. 17–78 or Haberman, S. and Sibett, T.A. (eds) (1995) History of Actuarial Science, VII, pp. 15–78, London].Google Scholar
- Black, F. and Scholes, M. (1973) “The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities”, Journal of Political Economy, 81: 637–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cox, J.C. and Ross, S.A. (1976) “The Valuation of Options for Alternative Stochastic Processes”, Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 145–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Derman, E. (April, 1996) “Model Risk”, Goldman Sachs Quantitative Strategies Research Notes.Google Scholar
- Derman, E. and Kani, I. (January, 1994) “The Volatility Smile and Its Implied Tree”. Goldman Sachs Quantitative Strategies Research Notes.Google Scholar
- Gallus, C. (1996) “Exploding Hedging Errors for Digital Options”, Working Paper, Deutsche Morgan Grenfell, October.Google Scholar
- Gibson, R., Lhabitant, F.S., Pistre, N. and Talay, D. (1999). “Interest Rate Model Risk: An Overview”, Journal of Risk, 1 (3): 37–62.Google Scholar
- Gibson, R., Lhabitant, F.S. and Talay, D. (2001) “Modelling the Term Structure of Interest Rates: A Review of the Literature”, Working Paper, http://ssrn.com/abstract=275076Google Scholar
- Green, T.C. and Figlewski, S. (1999) “Market Risk and Model Risk for a Financial Institution Writing Options”, Journal of Finance, 54 (4): 1465–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hirsa, A., Courtadon, G. and Madan, D.B. (2002) “The Effect of Model Risk on the Valuation of Barrier Options”, Journal of Risk Finance, 4 (Winter): 1–9.Google Scholar
- Lhabitant, F.S., Martini, C. and Reghai, A. (2001) “Pricing and Hedging Discount Bond Options in the Presence of Model Risk”, European Finance Review, 4 (1): 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Markowitz, H. (1959) Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investment (New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons).Google Scholar
- Merton, R.C. (1973) “The Theory of Rational Option Pricing”, Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4 (1): 141–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rubinstein, M. (1994) “Implied Binomial Trees”, Journal of Finance, 49 (3): 771–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sharpe, W.F. (1966) “Mutual Fund Performance”, Journal of Business, 39 (1): 119–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar