US Diplomacy and the Japanese Imposition of Protectorate on Korea

Sanmohonbu, Meiji-sanjushichihachinen Nichirosenshi [History of Russo-Japanese War] (Tokyo: Hakubunkan, 1912), I, 178;Google Scholar

Im Jong-gook, Ilbongun-ui Joseon Chimryaksa [History of Japanese Military Invasion into Korea] (Seoul: Ilwol Sugak, 1988), I, 111.Google Scholar

Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Komura Gaiko-shi [Diplomatic History of Komura] (Tokyo: 1953), II, 256.Google Scholar

Unno Fukuju, Kankoku Heigo [Annexation of Korea] (Tokyo: Iwanami, 1995), 124, 125, 130. NGB: 37, I, 297–98.Google Scholar

Oliver, Syungman Rhee: the Man behind the Myth (New York: Dodd, Mead, 1960), 72; Allen to Hay, December 17, 1904, KARD, III, 138.Google Scholar

Jung Chang-ryeol, “Noiljeonjaenge Daehan Hangukin-ui Daeeung” [The Reaction of Koreans to the Russo-Japanese War], Noiljeonjaeng-jeonhu Ilbonui Dae-Hangukchimryak, ed. Yeoksahakhoe (Seoul: Iljogak, 1986), 230–40. Robert Oliver, Syngman Rhee, 72–73.Google Scholar

Hangukshinmun Yeonguso, ed., Daehanmail Shinbo, I, September 17, November 2, 1904 (Seoul: Gyeongin Munhwawsa, 1976).Google Scholar

Japan, Rikugun, Chosen Chusatsugun Rekishi, ed. Kim Chong-myong (Tokyo: Gannando Shoten, 1967), 33–36, 177–79, 213–14; Jung Chang-ryul, “Noil Jeonnjaenge,” 212; Unno, Kankoku Heigo, 135–37.Google Scholar

Chong-sik Lee, Iseungman-ui Kuhanmal Gaehyeok-undong [Rhee’s efforts for Reform Movement] (Seoul: Paichai University Press, 2005), 39–44.Google Scholar

Kim Ki-suk, “Gwangmuje-ui Jugwonsuho Oegyo, 1905–1907,” [Kojong’s Diplomacy to Guard Sovereignty, 1905–1907], Ilbonui Daehanjeguk Gangjeom [Japan’s Seizure of Korea], ed. Lee Tae-jin (Seoul: Kkachi, 1995), 222–23.Google Scholar

Diary of Straight, on June 22, 1905, quoted in Herbert Croly, Williard Straight (New York: Macmillan, 1924), 169–71.Google Scholar

Taft to Roosevelt, April 5, 1905, quoted in Pringle, The Life and Times of William Howard Taft (New York: Farrar & Rinehart, 1939), 297.Google Scholar

Charles E. Neu, An Uncertain Friendship: Theodore Roosevelt and Japan, 1906–1909 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1967), 15–16;CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ralph E. Minger, William Howard Taft and United States Foreign Policy: The Apprenticeship Years 1900–1908 (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1975), 162.Google Scholar

Taft to Martin Egan, March 25, 1905, quoted in Henry F. Pringle, The Life and Times of William Howard Taft (New York: Farrar & Rinehart, 1939), 296–97.Google Scholar

See, Griswold, Far Eastern Policy (New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1938), 125–26.Google Scholar

Raymond A. Esthus, “The Taft-Katsura Agreement–Reality or Myth?” Journal of Modern History XXXI (March 1959): 50.Google Scholar

For counter arguments, see Jong-suk Chae, “Taft-Katsura Memorandum Reconsidered,” The Pacific Historical Review XXXVI (1968): 321–26; Nagata, Seodoa, 119–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ernest R. May, “The Far Eastern Policy of the United States in the Period of the Russo-Japanese War: A Russian View,” The American Historical Review LXII, 2 (January, 1957): 347.Google Scholar

For this view, see Outten Jones Clinard, Japan’s Influence on American Naval Power (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1947), University of California publication in history, 36, 43–44; Griswald, The Far Eastern Policy, 125–26; Nagata, Seodoa, 120–25.Google Scholar

Roosevelt to Cecil Arthur Spring Rice, June 16, Morrison, Letters of Roosevelt, 1905, 1233–34. For Roosevelt’s earlier concerns about Japanese design on the Philippines, see, Roosevelt to John Albert Tiffin Hull, March 16, 1905, ibid., 1140–41. As early as March 21, 1904, Roosevelt also expressed his hope that the confrontation between Japan and Russia would remove the Japanese threat toward the Philippines. See Sternburg to Foreign Ministry, March 21, 1904, Die Grosse Politik, 19 Band, pt. 1, 112–13.Google Scholar

For a discussion of the legal aspect of the agreement, see Jongsuk Chay, “Taft-Katsura Memorandum Reconsidered,” The Pacific Historical Review XXXVI (1968): 323–24.Google Scholar

Cecil Spring Rice, The Letters and Friendships of Sir Cecil Spring Rice: A Record, ed. by Stephen Gwynn (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1929), I, 449.Google Scholar

Durand to Lansdowne, January 23 and 26, 1905, Lansdowne MSS. xxxii. Quoted in George Monger, The End of Isolation: British Foreign Policy 1900–1907 (London: Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd, 1963), 181.Google Scholar

J. J. Korostovetz, Pre-War Diplomacy: The Russo-Japanese Problem, Treaty Signed at Portsmouth, USA., 1905, Diary of J.J. Korostovetz (London: British Periodicals, 1920), 6;Google Scholar

Esthus, Double Eagle and Rising Sun: the Russians and Japanese at Portsmouth in 1905 (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1988), 85.Google Scholar

Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Protocols of the Peace Conference between Japan and Russia (Tokyo: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, 1906), 10.Google Scholar

Sergius Witte, The Memoir of Count Witte, 135, 159; Roman Romanovich Rosen, Forty Years of Diplomacy (New York: Knopf, 1922), I, 263–64; Katsura to Komura, August 28, 1905, NGB: Nichiro Senso, V, 300–301. For best analyses, see, Esthus, Double Eagle and Rising Sun, 109–83.Google Scholar

Kaneko Kentaro, Nichirokowa-ni-kanshi Beikokuni-okeru Yono Katsudo-nitsuite [Concerning my activities in the United States during the Japanese-Russian peace negotiations] (January 1939), Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Research Division 1. First Section, Kenseishi Hensankai Shushu-bunsho 118, Kenseishiryou-shitsu, Japan National Diet Library, 62.Google Scholar

For other powers’ reaction, see, John Espy Merill, American Official Reactions to the Domestic Policies of Japan in Korea, 1905–1910 (Ph.D. Diss. Stanford University, 1954), 70–72.Google Scholar

Cha munseop, “Maegukui Apjapi Iljinhwoe,” Hanguk Hyeondaesa, 3–Minjokui Jeohang (Seoul: Shingu Munhwasa, 1969), 66–70.Google Scholar

Korean Emperor to President Roosevelt, quoted in McKenzie, Korea’s Fight for Freedom (New York: Fleming H. Revell Company, 1920), 102–3.Google Scholar

Croly, Willard Straight, 178, Hayashi Gonsuke, Waga Shichijunen-o Kataru [Memoirs of 70 Years] (Tokyo: Daiichi Shobo, 1935), 223–25, Tokyo Nichinichi Shimbun, November 25, 1905.Google Scholar

Guksa Pyunchan Wiwonhoe, Juhan Ilbongong sagwan Girok: 26, 118–25; Unno Fukuju, Kankoku Heigoushi-no Kenkyu (Tokyo: Iwanami, 2000), 200–21.Google Scholar

This is the account by Hulbert. His account was based on his interview with Han Kyu-sul. Hulbert, “American Policy in the Case of Korea and Belgium,” The New York Times, March 5, 1916. See also, Hayashi to Katsura, November 18, 1905, Juhan Ilbongongsagwan Girok: 26, 125–26.For a more detailed account, see, Unno Fukuju, Gaiko Shiryo: Kankoku Heigo [Annexation of Korea: Diplomatic Documents] (Tokyo: Fuji Suppan, 2004), I, 282–83.Google Scholar

Hulbert, Homer B. Hulbert, “American Policy in the Cases of Korea and Belgium”; Yoon Byung-suk, “Eulsa 5 joyak Shingochal,” Ilbon-ui Daehanjeguk Gangjeom (Seoul: Kkachi, 1995), ed. Lee Tae-jin, 58–59. For the related report, see, NGB: 38, I, 550–51.Google Scholar

For the representative article that regarded the treaty invalid, see Francis Rey, “La Situation Internationale de la Corée,” Revue Générale de Droit Internationale Public, XIII (1906), 40–58. For the related debate, see Kim Gi-seok, “Gwangmuje-ui Jugwonsuho Oegyo,” Ilboneui Daehanjeguk gangjeom, 226–27. See also, Unno Fukuju, Kankoku Heigo, 162–64.Google Scholar

Straight to Schoelkopf, November 14, 1905, Straight Papers, microfilm, R. 1; Herbert Croly, Willard Straight (New York: Macmillan, 1924), 177.Google Scholar

Hulbert, Ibid; McKenzie, Korea’s Fight for Freedom (New York: Fleming H. Revell, 1920), 100–101.Google Scholar

Chong-sik Lee, The Politics of Korean Nationalism (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1965), 78; Unno Fukuju, Gankokuheigo, 172–76, 180–82.Google Scholar

Chong-sik Lee, The Politics of Korean Nationalism (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1965), 79–85; Duus, Abacus and Sword, 220–34; Unno, Kankoku Heigo, 185–96.Google Scholar

Ku, Hangook, 215–82; Ku, Korea under Colonialism (Seoul: Royal Asiatic Society, Korea Branch, 1985), 133–68.Google Scholar

Nagata Akifumi, Nihonno Chosentochito Kokusaikankei [Japanese Control of Korea and International Relations] (Tokyo: Heibonsha, 2005), chapters 6, 13.Google Scholar