Process—The Way Things Work Around Here

  • Jerry L. Wellman

Abstract

In 1980 my daughter and I built a computer from a kit, the Heathkit H-8. The computer case was about 6 inches tall, 16 inches wide, and 17 inches deep and was powered from an electrical outlet, no batteries here. It had a sixteen-digit keypad for entering data and a light emitting diode numerical display. One of our most memorable discussions was about whether to upgrade from the standard 8k (8,192 storage locations or bytes) to the optional 16k of memory. This week Kelly and I looked at an Apple iPhone with 8 gigabytes (more than 8,000,000,000 bytes) of memory, 1 million times more than the computer she and I assembled in 1980. The iPhone is 1/300th the size of the H-8 (less than 5 cubic inches). It has an integrated touch keypad and a video display. It also contains a phone and a camera. It can store thousands of songs and I can listen to music for up to twenty-four hours without recharging the device.

Keywords

Tacit Knowledge Work Activity Leadership Team Business Unit Total Quality Management 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. APQC Member Teleconference. (2002). Six sigma and KM—exploring the potential of two powerful disciplines. http://www.apqc.org retrieved July 24, 2007.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, J.S., and P. Duguid. (1998). Organizing knowledge. California Management Review 40(3) (Spring): 90–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. This is an example of the enthusiasm about the information economy enabling, perhaps making inevitable, the spread of virtual organizations and the demise of traditional organization structures.Google Scholar
  4. Davenport, T.H., and L. Prusak. (1998). Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know. Boston, Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  5. The authors take a holistic view of how organizations deal with what they know.Google Scholar
  6. Jelinek, M. (1979). Institutionalizing innovation. New York, Praeger.Google Scholar
  7. Jelinek takes a narrower view of where and how organizations store what they know, asserting all such knowledge is stored within the work routines and procedures.Google Scholar
  8. Moorman, C., and A.S. Miner. (1998). Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Academy of Management Review 23(4): 698–723.Google Scholar
  9. The authors describe organizational procedural memory (skill knowledge) and declarative memory (fact knowledge) as factors that influence how well an organization improvises with what it knows.Google Scholar
  10. Walsh, J.P., and G.R. Ungson. (1991). Organizational memory. Academy of Management Review 16(1): 57–91.Google Scholar
  11. The authors argue that the representations of the concept of organizational memory are fragmented and underdeveloped. Their approach emphasizes proposed definitions of the “locus” of organizational memory, an approach not unlike the one offered herein.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Jerry L. Wellman 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jerry L. Wellman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations