The Cult of Imperial Honor in British India pp 79-128 | Cite as
A Middle-Class Method: Building the Steel Frame of the Raj
Abstract
After the Indian Mutiny of 1857, visions of a transformed India run on European lines increasingly gave way to the more authoritarian rule of the Raj. Although Queen Victoria never traveled to India, she articulated the new relationship by proclaiming that “India should belong to me.”3 The Queen (and later Empress) also issued a royal proclamation after the Mutiny stating that “her strength would be in the prosperity of her Indian subjects, her security in their contentment, and that their gratitude would be regarded by her Majesty as her best reward.”4 Generations of Britons during the Victorian era (and well into the twentieth century) grew up with similar beliefs concerning their right to rule India, making this sentiment almost universal in British society. Few questioned the right of the British to rule India, and instead the emphasis lay in justifying this rule, for if India now belonged to the empire, the subcontinent could at least fulfill its higher purpose to be ruled justly, if not democratically.
Keywords
Middle Class Indian Society East India Company Imperial Life Imperial GovernmentPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
- 1.This quotation fittingly appears in the introduction to Lea Homer, The Day of the Saxon (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1908).Google Scholar
- 3.Clark Worswick, “Photography in British India,” in The Last Empire: Photography in British India, ed. Clark Worswick and Ainslee Embree (New York: Aperture, 1976), 1. The author also notes that thirty years after the Mutiny, Victoria could be found studying Hindustani, eating Indian curries, and proclaiming that she was finally in “real contact” with the people of India. She also had a fondness for being photographed with her Indian servants, which seemed to reflect the imperial splendor of her empire and the unique relationship between Britain and India.Google Scholar
- 4.Sir William Lee-Warner, The Citizen of India (London: Macmillan, 1907), 8–9.Google Scholar
- 5.Kenneth Ballhatchett, Race Sex and Class under the Raj: Imperial Attitudes and their Critics, 1793–1905 (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1980), 164.Google Scholar
- 6.Frank Henderson Stewart, Honor (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994), 46.Google Scholar
- 7.Arthur Schopenhauer, “The Wisdom of Life,” in Essays from the Parerga and Paralipomena, trans. T. Bailey Saunders (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1951), 92.Google Scholar
- 8.Wordsworth, “The Wanderer,” line 341, The Excursion, ed. Thomas Hutchinson (Oxford: Oxford Standard Authors, 1904), 926.Google Scholar
- 9.John Beames, Memoirs of a Bengal Civilian (London: Chatto and Windus, 1961), 132.Google Scholar
- 11.Charles Allen, ed., Plain Tales from the Raj (London: Andre Deutsch, 1975), 96–97.Google Scholar
- 12.Dagmar Engels and Shula Marks, Contesting Colonial Hegemony (London: British Academic Press, 1994), 6.Google Scholar
- 13.Roberta J. Park, “Biological Thought, Athletics, and the formation of a ‘Man of Character,’” in Manliness and Morality, ed. J. A. Mangan and James Walvin (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1987), 7.Google Scholar
- 15.Christopher, Bayly, “Returning the British to South Asian History,” in Origins of Nationality in South Asia: Patriotism and Ethical Government in the Making of Modern India, ed. Christopher Bayly (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 289.Google Scholar
- 16.W. E. Mosse, Liberal Europe: The Age of Bourgeois Realism: 1848–1875 (New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1974), 12.Google Scholar
- 17.W. J. Reader, At Duty’s Call: Studies in Obsolete Patriotism (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1988), 1, 15.Google Scholar
- 19.Katherine Tidrick, Empire and English Character (London: IB Tauris, 1990), 4.Google Scholar
- 21.J. W. Kaye, “The English in India,” Calcutta Review, vol. 1, no. 1 (1844), 11. Quoted inGoogle Scholar
- Nihar Singh, British Historiography on British Rule in India: The Life and Writings of Sir John William Kaye, 1814–1876. (New Delhi: Janaki Prakashan, 1986), 25.Google Scholar
- 22.J. W. Kaye, “The English in India,” Calcutta Review, vol. 1, no. 2 (1844), 292, 319. Quoted in Singh, British Historiography, 25.Google Scholar
- 23.John MacKenzie, Orientalism: History, Theory and the Arts (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1995), 22.Google Scholar
- 25.Francis Hutchins, The Illusion of Permanence (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1967), 128.Google Scholar
- 27.E. M. Collingham, Imperial Bodies: The Physical Experience of the Raj, c. 1800–1947 (Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2001), 118.Google Scholar
- 30.Bradford Spangenberg, “The Problem of Recruitment for the Indian Civil Service during the Late Nineteenth Century,” Journal of Asian Studies, vol. 30, no. 2 (February 1971): 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Raymond K. Renford, The Non-Official British in India to 1920 (Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1987), 25.Google Scholar
- 34.On the issue of “character” in England, see Stefan Collini, Public Moralists: Political Thought and Intellectual Life in Britain 1850–1930 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991). Much like character in Britain, honor could be widely distributed to all classes, and even socialists in England spoke of the rampant individualism of England was destroying “character,” 93.Google Scholar
- 35.J. Morley, Life of Gladstone, vol. 1, 649. Quoted in J. M. Compton, “Open Competition and the Indian Civil Service, 1854–1876,” English Historical Review, vol. 83, no. 327 (April 1968): 266.Google Scholar
- 42.Philip Mason, English Gentleman, 170. Quoted in David C. Potter, India’s Political Administrators (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986), 74.Google Scholar
- 47.Sir John Strachey, India, its Administration and Progress (London: John Murray, 1888), 432.Google Scholar
- 49.Ute Frevert, “Honour and Middle-Class Culture,” in Bourgeois Society in Nineteenth-Century Europe, ed. Jurgen Kocka and Allen Mitchell (Oxford: Berg, 1993), 219.Google Scholar
- 50.H. John Field, Toward a Programme of Imperial Life (Westport, CN: Greenwood Press, 1982), 70.Google Scholar
- 51.Sir Richard Temple, India in 1880, 3rd ed. (London: John Murray, 1881), 44.Google Scholar
- 53.David Cannadine, The Rise and Fall of Class in Britain (New York: Columbia University Press), 108.Google Scholar
- 54.Susanne Rudolph and Lloyd Rudolph, ed., Reversing the Gaze: Amar Singh’s Diary, A Colonial Subject’s Narrative of Imperial India, ed. Susanne Rudolph and Lloyd Rudolph (USA: Westview Press, 2002), 8–10.Google Scholar
- 58.Douglas M. Peers, “Britain and Empire,” in A Companion to Nineteenth-Century Britain, ed. Chris Williams (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2007), 63.Google Scholar
- 60.Ian Baucom, Out of Place: Englishness, Empire, and the Locations of Identity (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999), 79.Google Scholar
- 63.R. Pearson, Eastern Interlude: A Social History of the European Community in Calcutta (Calcutta: Thacker Spink, 1912), 214–215.Google Scholar
- 64.Bhupal Singh, Survey of Anglo-Indian Fiction, 2nd ed. (London: Curzon Press, 1975), 7.Google Scholar
- 67.A previous example in which aristocratic conceptions of honor slowly seeped into the lower strata is documented in studies of the ancient world. In ancient Greece, the growth of slavery reinforced the timocratic character of the ruling class, but also “stimulated its diffusion among all classes, for, by the classical period, these were societies in which even the destitute felt deprived if they could not afford a slave.” See Orlando Patterson, Slavery and Social Death (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982), 87.Google Scholar
- 69.Though dueling in the middle-class Indian army was popular after it had lost its appeal in England, since imperial men had more power, and thus more of a reputation to defend when living in India, and dueling was a relatively easy route to the world of the genteel. Since much of the British Army and Navy were quartered abroad, their influence on English life may have been minimized there, so that dueling remained popular in India because of the preponderance of military officers there. See Antony Simpson, “Dandelion on the Field of Honour: Dueling, the Middle Classes, and the Law in Nineteenth Century England,” Criminal Justice History, vol. 9 1988): 139.Google Scholar
- 75.Peter Quennell, ed., The Prodigal Rake: Memoirs of William Hickey (New York: E.P. Dutton, 1962), 112.Google Scholar
- 82.A. Claude Brown, The Ordinary Man’s India (London: Cecil Palmer, 1927), 21.Google Scholar
- 83.Bertram Wyatt-Brown, Southern Honor: Ethics and Behavior in the Old South (New York: Oxford University Press, 1982), 14.Google Scholar
- 84.David Gilmour, The Ruling Caste: Imperial Lives in the Victorian Raj (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2005), 253.Google Scholar
- 89.James Morris, Pax Britannica: The Climax of an Empire (New York: Harvest/HBJ Book, 1968), 269.Google Scholar
- 93.Thomas Metcalf, Ideologies of the Raj (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997) 45.Google Scholar
- 99.S. Gopal, The Viceroyalty of Lord Ripon, 1880–1884 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1953), 84. Quoted inGoogle Scholar
- Brendan, Decline and Fall of the British Empire (London: Jonathan Cape, 2007), 235.Google Scholar
- 108.Bradford Spangenberg, “The Problem of Recruitment for the Indian Civil Service during the Late Nineteenth Century,” Journal of Asian Studies, vol. 30, no. 2 (February 1971): 354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 111.James Grant-Duff, “India: Political and Social & c,” Contemporary Review, XXVI, 866. Quoted in Lawrence James, The Raj: The Making and Unmaking of British India (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1997), 303.Google Scholar
- 118.John W. Cell, Hailey: A Study in British Imperialism, 1872–1969 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 13.Google Scholar
- 119.Fergus Innes, interview by de Caro. 4700.0579/843. Though this advice originally came from Henry Lawrence, who advised his political agents in the 1840s to “settle the country, make the people happy, and take care there are no rows.” Inherently conservative, Anglo-Indians recognized good advice when they heard it. See James Morris, Heaven’s Command: An Imperial Progress (New York: Harvest, 1973), 184.Google Scholar
- 122.Philip Mason, Prospero’s Magic: Some Thoughts on Class and Race (London: Oxford University Press, 1962), 28.Google Scholar
- 129.Admiral Franklin Goodrich, “Letter from Bombay,” in Some American Opinions on the Indian Empire by Theodore Roosevelt et al. (London: T. Fisher Unwin, 1916).Google Scholar
- 131.Lieutenant Colonel Alexander George Stuart, The Indian Empire: A Short Review and Some Hints for the Soldier Proceeding to India (London: His Majesty’s Stationery Office 1927), 119.Google Scholar
- 136.Chester Macnaghten, Common Thoughts on Serious Subjects (Bombay: Education Society’s Seam Press, 1892), 231.Google Scholar
- 138.Eric Hoffer, The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements (USA: Perennial Classics, 2002), 136.Google Scholar
- 143.Steevens, Egypt in 1898 (London: Dodd, Mead, 1899), 253.Google Scholar
- 145.Robert H. MacDonald, The Language of Empire: Myths and Metaphors of Popular Imperialism 1880–1918 (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1994), 86.Google Scholar
- 148.Leslie Stephen, Life of Fitzjames Stephen (New York: Putnam’s Sons, 1895), 244–245.Google Scholar
- 151.Edith Cuthell, My Garden in the City of Gardens (London, 1893), 163. Quoted inGoogle Scholar
- Mary Procida, Married to the Empire: Gender, Politics, and Imperialism in India 1883–1947. (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002), 147.Google Scholar
- 153.Elliot Evan Mills, The Decline and Fall of the British Empire: A Brief Account of Those Causes which Resulted in the Destruction of our Late Ally, Together with a Comparison between the British and Roman Empire (Appointed for use in the National schools of Japan. Tokio [sic], 2005) (Oxford: Alden, 1905), 58.Google Scholar
- 156.Kipling, “The Education of Padgett, M. P.” in Departmental Ditties (New York: 1913), 61.Google Scholar
- 157.William Arnold, in a series of articles in Fraser’s magazine in the 1850s, decried the ignorance of most Britons about empire. According to Arnold, those who claimed to know about India were “Radicals” and “frothy declaimers,” ignorant of India. Arnold wished that those same “Radicals” could be forced to live under the rule of an Indian prince, to teach the critics of empire a valuable lesson about empire and the benefits of British rule. See William Arnold, “What is the Indian Question?” Fraser’s Magazine, vol. 48 (1853): 248.Google Scholar
- 158.Robert Buchanan, “The Voice of the Hooligan,” in Rudyard Kipling: The Critical Heritage, ed. Roger Green (London: Routledge, 1971), 247.Google Scholar
- 160.Valentin Chirol, Indian Unrest (London: Macmillan, 1910), 301.Google Scholar
- 164.David Arnold, “European Orphans and Vagrants in India in the Nineteenth Century,” Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History, vol. 7, no. 2 (1979): 104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 166.Charles Dilke, Greater Britain (London: Macmillan, 1869), 517. Quoted in Hutchins, Illusion of Permanence, 111.Google Scholar
- 168.Paul Scott, Staying On (repr., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998), 96–97. Quoted in Cannadine, Rise and Fall of Class in Britain, 146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar