American Puppet Modernism pp 219-230 | Cite as
Old and New Materials: Wood, Paper, Metal, Plastic, Bone
Abstract
Having looked at some aspects of American puppet modernism in terms of the way objects in motion have helped define U.S. culture in the past 150 years, I would like to focus in particular on the materials used in such performances, in order to think about how the identity of those materials has helped define the ways in which modernist performance has developed. Specifically, I want to consider the shifts in object performance from traditional materials such as wood, leather, paper, and bone; to such “modern” materials as metal, plastic, glass, and rubber, and how the identities of these materials influence the performances created with them.
Keywords
Live Performance Hybrid Culture Live Theatre Street Demonstration Puppet ShowPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
- 1.Oskar Schlemmer, The Letters and Diaries of Oskar Schlemmer, ed. Tut Schlemmer (Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1971) 243.Google Scholar
- 2.Alfred Jarry, “Ubu sur la Butte,” in Tout Ubu (Paris: Livre de Poche, 1962) 455–456.Google Scholar
- 4.Guy Debord, The Society of the Spectacle (Detroit, MI: Black & Red, 1977).Google Scholar
- 5.Simon Watney, “The Spectacle of AIDS,” AIDS: Cultural Analysis Cultural Activism, ed. Douglas Crimp (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989) 80.Google Scholar
- 7.Larry Kramer, Reports fom the Holocaust: The Making of an AIDS Activist (New York: St. Martins Press, 1981) 138.Google Scholar
- 10.See Douglas Crimp and Adam Rolston, AIDS Demo Graphics (Seattle, WA: Bay Press, 1990) for an examination of ACT-UP graphic designs used in demonstrations.Google Scholar
- 13.For an account of the puppet activism connected to the Seattle protests and other events, see Morgan F. P. Andrews, “When Magic Confronts Authority: The Rise of Protest Puppetry in N. America,” Realizing the Impossible: Art against Authority (Oakland, CA: A. K. Press, 2007) 180–209.Google Scholar