Advertisement

A New Imbalance in the Equation of Military Balance Across the Taiwan Strait

  • York W. Chen

Abstract

Such an assertion is neither novel nor one-sided. The rapid speed of China’s acquisition of many advanced weapons systems and its improvements in training and doctrine have rendered Taiwan’s relative qualitative advantage in weapons and personnel to be no longer sustainable. In the past, this was regarded as Taiwan’s critical advantage for counterbalancing China’s quantitative superiority. Many analysts, both in Taiwan and the United States, believe it is only a matter of time before China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) outpaces their Taiwan’s counterparts in quality as well. Besides, the US Department of Defense (DoD) repeatedly expressed its concerns over this emerging imbalance; many American scholars have reached the similar conclusion. For example, Dr. David Shambaugh claimed in 2002 that the PLA would complete its preparations to present a credible threat to Taiwan by 2007.1 In Taiwan, several key national security policymakers also gradually realized this embarrassing fact. Former Chairperson Tsai Ing-Wen of Taiwan’s Mainland Affairs Council even argued that Taiwan might lose its military superiority in 2005.2 According to Taiwan’s Ministry of National Defense (MND), the PLA’s air and naval capabilities might “qualitatively surpass that of ours by 2010.”3

Keywords

Ballistic Missile Cruise Missile Missile Defense United Daily News Mutual Defense Treaty 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    David Shambaugh, Modernizing China’s Military: Progress, Problems, and Prospects (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002), p. 329.Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    Robert R. Leonhard, Fighting by Minutes: Time and the Art of War (Westport: Praeger, 1994), pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    Colin S. Gray, Modern Strategy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), p. 16.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    Ajay Singh, “Time: The New Dimension in War,” Joint Forces Quarterly, vol. 10 (1995), p. 129.Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    Robert S. Ross, “Navigating the Taiwan Strait: Deterrence, Escalation, Dominance, and US-China Relations,” International Security, vol. 27, no. 2 (2002), p. 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 8.
    Hau Pei-Tsun, Eight-Year Diary as the Chief of General Staff, vol. 1 (Taiwan: Commonwealth Publishing Company, 2000), p. 153. Original in Chinese.Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    ROC MND, The Dictionary of Military Terms of the ROC Armed Forces, 1999, pp. 2–14. Original in Chinese.Google Scholar
  8. 12.
    For example, Xiaobing Li, “PLA Attacks and Amphibious Operations during the Taiwan Strait Crises of 1954–1955 and 1958,” in Chinese Warfighting: The PLA Experience since 1949, ed. Mark A. Ryan, David M. Finkelstein, and Michael A. McDevitt (Armonk: M. E. Sharpe, 2003), pp. 143–167.Google Scholar
  9. 13.
    Niu Jun, “Chinese Decision Making in Three Military Actions Across the Taiwan Strait,” in Managing Sino-American Crises: Case Studies and Analysis, ed. Michael D. Swaine, Zhang Tuosheng, and Danielle F. S. Cohen (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2006), p. 313.Google Scholar
  10. 16.
    According to Professor Cole’s assessment, the transit time for the US reinforcing vessels to arrive in the Taiwan Strait from Hawaii or the US west coast will take 9–14 days or 12–18 days respectively. See Bernard D. Cole, “The Modernizing People’s Liberation Army-Navy (PLAN) and Taiwan’s Security,” Taiwan Defense Affairs, vol. 2, no. 2 (2001), p. 121.Google Scholar
  11. 18.
    Michael Pillsbury, “The US Role in Taiwan’s Defense Reforms,” Taiwan Defense Affairs, vol. 4, no. 2 (2003), p. 70.Google Scholar
  12. 19.
    Michael S. Chase, “US-Taiwan Security Cooperation: Enhancing an Unofficial Relationship,” in Dangerous Strait: The US-Taiwan-China Crisis ed. Nancy Bernkopf Tucker (New York: Columbia University Press, 2005), pp. 174–179.Google Scholar
  13. 20.
    For details, see Paul H. B. Godwin, “The PLA Faces the Twenty-First Century: Reflections on Technology, Doctrine, Strategy, and Operations,” in China’s Military Faces the Future, ed. James R. Lilley and David Shambaugh (Armonk: M. E. Sharpe, 1999), pp. 48–53.Google Scholar
  14. 21.
    Council on Foreign Relations, Chinese Military Power, 2003, p. 3.Google Scholar
  15. 24.
    Ministry of National Defense (Taiwan), National Defense Report, 2006, p. 60. Original in Chinese.Google Scholar
  16. 25.
    “‘Aircraft-Sea Air Combat’ at Taiwan Strait,” Kanwa Defense Review, May 2006, pp. 18–19. Original in Chinese (also in English and Japanese). Also, US DoD, Annual Report to Congress: Military Power of People’s Republic of China, 2006, p. 29.Google Scholar
  17. 26.
    Bernard D. Cole, “The Modernizing People’s Liberation Army-Navy (PLAN) and Taiwan’s Security,” Taiwan Defense Affairs, vol. 2, no. 2 (2001), p. 118.Google Scholar
  18. 27.
    For details, see Martin Edmonds and York W. Chen, “Assessment of the ROCN’s Modernization: Views from Strategic and Operational Considerations,” Taiwan Defense Affairs, vol. 2, no. 2 (2002), pp. 144–172.Google Scholar
  19. 28.
    ROCAF Lt. Col. (retired) Haiso-Lung Chen, “Analysis on the Employment of the PLA’s Tactical Missiles against Taiwan,” National Defense Magazine, vol. 18, no. 1 (1998), p. 106. Original in Chinese.Google Scholar
  20. 29.
    Jonathan D. Pollack, “Short-Range Ballistic Missile Capabilities,” in If China Attacks Taiwan: Military Strategy, Politics, and Economics, ed. Steve Tsang (London: Routledge, 2006), p. 58.Google Scholar
  21. 32.
    US DoD, Annual Report to Congress: Military Power of People’s Republic of China, 2006, p. 29.Google Scholar
  22. 36.
    US-China Economic and Security Review Commission, Report to Congress, 2006, p. 145.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Peter C. Y. Chow 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • York W. Chen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations