The South Korean Response: The Regional Context

  • Gilbert Rozman
Part of the Strategic Thought in Northeast Asia book series (STNA)

Abstract

Over the past 615 years since the Mongols were expelled from the land, Korea has experienced 500 years of dependence on China, 40 years of dominance by Japan, 60 years of divided reliance on the United States in the South and mostly on the Soviet Union in the North, and just a few decades when it was even possible to search for autonomy through a balance of powers.1 The concept of sadae recalls how Koreans work with a hegemonic power to keep control of their own destiny or, if unavoidable, just to achieve partial autonomy. When deterring war with the North at last no longer seemed necessary, the goal of expanding national independence or even ending sadae rose to the fore but with disappointing results. Many see the United States trying to retain its dominance, China inclined to reassert its, Japan eyeing ways to reimpose its, and Russia not to be ignored.2 Hopes endure, however, of seizing a rare opportunity to work with all of these countries to find a balance conducive to reunification, more sovereign control, and regional influence.

Keywords

Regional Context Strategic Thinking Economic Sanction Nuclear Issue Nuclear Crisis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Charles K. Armstrong, Gilbert Rozman, Samuel S. Kim, and Stephen Kotkin, eds., Korea at the Center: Dynamics of Regionalism in Northeast Asia (coeditor, M.E. Sharpe, 2006).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sang-woo Rhee, “Introduction,” in Sang-woo Rhee and Tae-hyo Kim, eds., Korea-Japan Security Relations: Prescriptive Studies (Seoul: New Asia Research Institute, 2000).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hong Nack Kim, “The Kim Dae-Jung Government’s North Korea Policy,” Korea & World Affairs, Vol. 29, No. 2 (Summer 2005), pp. 520–40.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    Yu-hwan Koh, “Roh Moo-hyun Administration’s North Korea Policy and Nuclear Crisis Management,” Korea & World Affairs, Vol. 30, No. 1 (Spring 2006), pp. 6–7.Google Scholar
  5. 11.
    Lee Wook Yon, “Korea-China Cultural Relations and a ‘Communal House,’” Korea Focus, Vol. 13, No. 1 (January–February 2005), pp. 125–38.Google Scholar
  6. 12.
    Yang Gi-ho, “Ilbuk gwangye oe jonchi gyongjejok,” in Chong Jin-oe, ed., Saeroun Dongbuka jilso oa Hanbando (Seoul: Homansha, 1998), pp. 502–21.Google Scholar
  7. 15.
    David Kang, “Japan: U.S. Partner or Focused on Abductees,” The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 4 (Autumn 2005), pp. 107–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 16.
    Scott Snyder, “South Korea’s Squeeze Play,” The Washington Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 4 (Autumn 2005), pp. 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 28.
    Chong Hui-sok, “Dongbuka dajaanbo hyopryok goa Roshia,” Hanguk jongji oigyosa ronchong, Vol. 27, No. 2 (2006), pp. 429–63.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Gilbert Rozman 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gilbert Rozman

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations