Under Control: the Genteel Body

  • Linda Young
Chapter

Abstract

Self-control was the fundamental principle of the courtesy traditions that preceded the genteel revolution. Regulation of the body and its appetites, desires, effluvia and excrescences constituted the first step in the civilizing process, located in both the individual and society. Freud depicts resolution of the struggle between self-control and instinct as the repressive compromise between ‘civilisation and its discontents’, a phrase with special resonance in the discourse of gentility. In his own psychoanalytic terms, Freud traces self-control as the individual’s biologically grounded passage from infantile libidinous drive to adult establishment of the superego, expressed as a conscience, a sense of guilt and the capacity for remorse.1 This vision of natural stages of psychic growth frames the view that social development occurs at the expense of individual desire. Elias refers to Freud’s interpretation, but inverts it by historicizing the regulation of the body within the social order defined by different expressions of state power. The hypothesis that external power shapes the individual psyche according to evolving techniques of power is illustrated by the history of increasingly self-managed controls over the body2 Both theories illuminate the growth of human cultivation as the sublimation of animal instincts by order presented in rules imposed by the authority of kings, parents or teachers and naturalized as civil, adult behaviour.

Keywords

Nineteenth Century Early Nineteenth Century Domestic Economy Late Eighteenth Century White Cotton 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Sigmund Freud, Civilization and Its Discontents (New York: WW. Norton, 1962 [1930]) pp. 44, 70.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Norbert Elias, The Civilizing Process, vol. 2, State Formation and Civilization (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1994 [1939]) ch. 2.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Lawrence Wright, Clean and Decent: The Fascinating History of the Bathroom and Water Closet (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1960) p. 24.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    Siegfried Giedion, Mechanization Takes Command: a Contribution to Anonymous History (New York: Norton, 1969 [1948]) p. 628.Google Scholar
  5. Richard Bushman and Claudia Bushman, ‘The Early History of Cleanliness in America’, Journal of American History, vol. 74, no. 4 (1988) p. 1219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 7.
    Catharine Beecher, A Treatise on Domestic Economy (New York: Source Books, 1970 [1841]) p. 103.Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    A Copley, Female Excellence, p. 49; A Lady of Distinction, The Mirror of the Graces, or, the English Lady’s Costume (New York: I. Riley, 1815) pp. 34–5; Emily Thornwell, The Lady’s Guide to Perfect Gentility (New York: Derby & Jackson, 1858) pp. 21–2; A. F. Crell and W. M. Wallace, The Family Oracle of Good Health, Economy, Medicine and Good Living, vol. 1 (London: Knight & Lacey 1824) p. 310.Google Scholar
  8. 10.
    George Hepplewhite, The Cabinet-Maker and Upholsterer’s Guide, 3rd edn ([1794] facs. New York: Dover, 1969) pl. 83, 84; Thomas Sheraton, The Cabinet-Maker and Upholsterer’s Drawing Book, part 3 (London: T. Bensley 1793) pl. 42–3, pp. 393–4; pl. 53, pp. 109–10.Google Scholar
  9. 11.
    See examples in Edward Joy, Pictorial Dictionary of British Nineteenth Century Design (Woodbridge, Suffolk: Antique Collectors Club, 1984) pp. 70–5.Google Scholar
  10. 12.
    W. Smee and Sons, Designs for Furniture, 1850, in Pictorial Dictionary, pp. 73–4.Google Scholar
  11. 14.
    John Gloag, A Short Dictionary of Furniture (London, George Allen & Unwin, 1969) pp. 235–6.Google Scholar
  12. 16.
    See recipes for toilet and laundry soaps in Thomas Webster, Encyclopedia of Domestic Economy (London: Longman, Bowman and Green & Longman, 1844) pp. 1035, 1079–80.Google Scholar
  13. 17.
    Neville Williams, Powder and Paint: A History of the Englishwoman’s Toilet (London: Longman, Green & Co., 1957) p. 89.Google Scholar
  14. 21.
    Maureen Ogle, ‘Domestic Reform in American Household Plumbing’, Winterthur Portfolio, vol. 28, no. 1 (Spring 1993) pp. 36–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 22.
    Horatio Mahomed, The Bath: A Concise History of Bathing (London: Smith, Elder & Co., 1843) p. 27.Google Scholar
  16. 28.
    See historic house re-creations in Christina Hardyment, Behind the Scenes: Domestic Arrangements in Historic Houses (London: National Trust, 1997) p. 203. Mahomed, The Bath, p. 47.Google Scholar
  17. 31.
    May Stone, ‘The Plumbing Paradox: American Attitudes towards Late Nineteenth Century Domestic Sanitary Arrangements’, Winterthur Portfolio, vol. 14, no. 3 (Autumn 1979) p. 285;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mark Girouard, Life in the English Country House (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1980) pp. 265–6.Google Scholar
  19. 36.
    Caroline Davidson, A Woman’s Work is Never Done: A History of Housework in the British Isles 1650–1950 (London: Chatto & Windus, 1982) p. 12.Google Scholar
  20. 41.
    M. G. Jones, The Story of Brushmaking: a Norfolk Craft (Norwich: Briton Chadwick, 1974).Google Scholar
  21. 43.
    Paul Shackel, Personal Discipline and Material Culture: An Archaeology of Annapolis, Maryland, 1695–1870 (Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1993) pp. 48–9.Google Scholar
  22. 49.
    Beverley Lemire, Fashion’s Favourite: The Cotton Trade and the Consumer in Britain, 1660–1800 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991) pp. 95–6.Google Scholar
  23. 50.
    Christina Walkley and Vanda Foster, Crinolines and Crimping Irons: Victorian Clothes: How They Were Cleaned and Cared For (London: Peter Owen, 1978) p. 40.Google Scholar
  24. 52.
    Anne Hollander, Seeing Through Clothes (New York: Viking, 1975) pp. 132–3.Google Scholar
  25. 53.
    C. Willet Cunnington and Phillis Cunnington, The History of Underclothes (New York: Dover, 1992 [1951]) pp. 111, 130.Google Scholar
  26. 54.
    Captain Jesse, The Life of George Brummell Esquire (London: Saunders & Otley 1844) p. 69.Google Scholar
  27. 56.
    Lucy Frost, No Place for a Nervous Lady: Voices from the Australian Bush (Melbourne: McPhee Gribble, 1984) p. 47.Google Scholar
  28. 57.
    Kathy Peiss, Hope in a Jar: The Making of America’s Beauty Culture (New York: Metropolitan Books, 1998) pp. 26–31.Google Scholar
  29. 58.
    Gloag, Short Dictionary of Furniture, pp. 302–3, 573, 672–3; cf. three designers’ formulations: Thomas Chippendale, The Gentleman and Cabinet-Maker’s Director, 3rd edn ([1762], facs. New York: Dover, 1966) pl. 52; Hepplewhite, Guide, pl. 72–3; Sheraton, Drawing Book, Appendix, pl. 7, p. 156.Google Scholar
  30. 60.
    Jane B. Donegan, ‘Hydropathic Highway to Health’: Women and Water-Cure in Antebellum America (New York: Greenwood Press, 1986) ch. 9.Google Scholar
  31. 62.
    Giovanni della Casa, Galateo, or the Book of Manners (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1958) p. 24.Google Scholar
  32. 64.
    Lucinda Lambton, Temples of Convenience and Chambers of Delight (New York: St. Martin’s Press — now Palgrave Macmillan, 1995) p. 12.Google Scholar
  33. 73.
    Anne Buck, Victorian Costume and Costume Accessories, 2nd edn (Bedford: Ruth Bean, 1984) p. 172.Google Scholar
  34. 77.
    David Yosifon and Peter N. Stearns, ‘The Rise and Fall of American Posture’, American Historical Review, vol. 103, no. 4 (1998) p. 1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 79.
    Mrs Almira Lincoln Phelps, Hours With My Pupils: The Young Lady’s Guide (New York: Charles Scribner & Co., 1859) p. 110.Google Scholar
  36. 80.
    Bushman, Richard, The Refinement of America: Persons, Houses, Cities (New York: Knopf, 1992) p. 295.Google Scholar
  37. 81.
    Elizabeth Ewing, Dress and Undress: A History of Underclothes (London: Bibliophile, 1978) p. 57.Google Scholar
  38. 82.
    C. Willet Cunnington and Phillis Cunnington, The History of Underclothes (New York: Dover, 1992 [1951]) p. 106.Google Scholar
  39. 83.
    Albert E. Scheflen, Body Language and Social Order: Communication as Behavioural Control (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1972) p. 9.Google Scholar
  40. 84.
    Kenneth L. Ames, Death in the Dining Room, and Other Tales of Victorian Culture (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1992) pp. 201–6.Google Scholar
  41. 85.
    Katherine C. Grier, Culture and Comfort: People, Parlours and Upholstery, 1850–1930 (Rochester, NY: Strong Museum, 1988) pp. 108–9.Google Scholar
  42. 95.
    Mrs Ellis, The Mothers of England: Their Influence and Responsibility (London: Fisher, Son & Co., 1843) p. 164.Google Scholar
  43. 96.
    Carroll Smith-Rosenberg, ‘The Female World of Love and Ritual: Relations between Women in Nineteenth-Century America’, in Disorderly Conduct: Visions of Gender in Victorian America (New York: Knopf, 1985) pp. 60–2.Google Scholar
  44. 97.
    Daniel C. Eddy, The Young Man’s Friend (Boston: Dayton & Wentworth, 1855) p. 117.Google Scholar
  45. 98.
    Peter N. Stearns, Battleground of Desire: The Struggle for Self-Control in Modern America (New York: New York University Press, 1999) pp. 58–9.Google Scholar
  46. 100.
    Richard Waterhouse, Private Pleasures, Public Leisures: A History of Australian Popular Culture since 1788 (Melbourne: Longman, 1995) pp. 23, 38–9.Google Scholar
  47. 101.
    F. M. L. Thompson, The Rise of Respectable Society: a Social History of Victorian Britain 1830–1900 (London: Fontana, 1988) p. 334.Google Scholar
  48. 102.
    Barbara Leslie Epstein, The Politics of Domesticity: Women, Evangelism and Temperance in Nineteenth-Century America (Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1981) pp. 1, 89.Google Scholar
  49. 103.
    Cited in John D’Emilio and Estelle B. Freedman, Intimate Matters: A History of Sexuality in America (New York: Harper & Row, 1988) p. 70.Google Scholar
  50. 106.
    Jeffrey Weekes, Sex, Politics and Society: The Regulation of Sexuality since 1800, 2nd edn (London: Longman, 1989) p. 49.Google Scholar
  51. 108.
    William L. Langer, ‘The Origins of the Birth Control Movement in England in the Early Nineteenth Century’, Journal of Interdisciplinary History, vol. 5, no. 4 (1975) p. 684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Linda Young 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Linda Young

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations