Advertisement

An Evolutionary Perspective on Male Preferences for Female Body Shape

  • Isabel Scott
  • Gillian R. Bentley
  • Martin J. Tovée
  • Farid Uddin Ahamed
  • Kesson Magid
Chapter

Abstract

Cross-culturally, humans make systematic use of physical attractiveness to discriminate among members of the opposite sex, and physical cues to youth, health, and fertility may be particularly important to men (Buss, 1989). Nevertheless, there is controversy over whether attraction preferences are adaptive, particularly in novel environments, and whether they are universal or flexible depending on cultural circumstances (Singh & Luis, 1995). To date, a good deal of research into somatic (i.e., body) attractiveness has focused on two particular characteristics: waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and the body mass index (BMI). WHR is calculated as the circumference of the waist divided by circumference of the hips, and provides an index of a woman’s ‘curvaceousness.’ BMI is calculated as an individual’s weight (kilogrammes) divided by height (metres) squared, and provides an estimate of body fatness.

Keywords

High Body Mass Index Obese Woman Body Shape Male Preference Attractiveness Rating 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J. L., Crawford, C. B., Nadeau, J., & Lindberg, T. (1992). Was the Duchess of Windsor right? A cross-cultural review of the socioecology of ideals of female body shape. Ethology and Sociobiology, 13, 197–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, J. L., Michaelsen, K. F., Rasmussen, K. M., & Sorensen, T. I. (2004). Maternal prepregnant body mass index, duration of breastfeeding, and timing of complementary food introduction are associated with infant weight gain. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 80, 1579–1588.Google Scholar
  3. Barber, N. (1995). The evolutionary psychology of physical attractiveness: Sexual selection and human morphology. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 395–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benyshek, D. C., & Watson, J. T. (2006). Exploring the thrifty genotype’s food shortage assumptions: A cross-cultural comparison of ethnographic accounts of food security among foraging and agricultural societies. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 131, 120–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhargava, A. (2000). Modelling the effects of maternal nutritional status and socioeconomic variables on the anthropometric and psychological indicators of Kenyan infants from age 0–6 months. American Journal ofPhysical Anthropology, 111, 89–104.Google Scholar
  6. Björntorp, P. (1988). The associations between obesity, adipose tissue distribution and disease. Acta Medica Scandinavica, 723 (Suppl.), 121–134.Google Scholar
  7. Brewis, A. A., & McGarvey, S. T. (2000). Body image, body size, and Samoan ecological and individual modernization. Ecology of Food and Nutrition, 39, 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buckingham, G., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Welling, L. L. M., Conway, C. A., Tiddeman, B. P., et al. (2006). Visual adaptation to masculine and feminine faces influences generalized preferences and perceptions of trustworthiness. Evolution and Human behavior, 27, 381–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses testing in 37 cultures. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cashdan, E. (2003). Hormones and competitive aggression in women. Aggressive behavior, 29, 107–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cordain, L., Miller, J., & Mann, M. (1999). Scant evidence of periodic starvation among hunter-gatherers. Diabetologia, 42, 383–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Department of Health. (1999). The health survey for England 1999. Online publication at: http://www.dh.gov.uk/PublicationsAndStatistics/Published Survey.
  13. DeRidder, C. M., Bruning, P. F., Zonderland, M. L., Thijssen, J. H. H., Bonfrer, J. M. G., Blankenstein, M. A., et al. (1990). Body fat mass, body fat distribution and plasma hormones in early puberty in females. Journal of Clinical and Endocrinological Metabolism, 70, 888–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eade, J. A., & Momen, R. (1996). Bangladeshis in Britain: A national database. London: Centre for Bangladeshi Studies.Google Scholar
  15. Ellison, P. T., Lipson, S. F., Orourke, M. T., Bentley, G. R., Harrigan, A. M., Panterbrick, C., et al. (1993a). Population Variation in Ovarian-Function. Lancet, 342, 433–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellison, P. T., Panterbrick, C., Lipson, S. F., & Orourke, M. T. (1993b). The ecological context of human ovarian-function. Human Reproduction, 8, 2248–2258.Google Scholar
  17. Furnham, A., & Alibhai, N. (1983). Cross-cultural differences in the perception of female body shapes. Psychological Medicine, 13, 829–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Furnham, A., McClelland, A., & Omer, L. (2003). A cross-cultural comparison of ratings of perceived fecundity and sexual attractiveness as a function of body weight and waist-to-hip ratio. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 8, 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Furnham, A., Tan, T., McManus, C. (1997). Waist-to-hip ratio and preferences for body shape: A replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 539–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garfinkel, P. E., & Garner, D. M. (1982). Anorexia nervosa: A multidimensional perspective. New York: Bruner and Mazel.Google Scholar
  21. Gitter, A., Lomranz, J., Saxe, L., & Bar-Tal, D. (1983). Perception of female physique characteristics by American and Israeli students. Journal of Social Psychology, 121, 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gluckman, P., & Hanson, M. (2005). The fetal matrix: Evolution, development and disease. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hartz, A. J., Rupley, D. C., & Rimm, A. A. (1984). The association of girth measurement with disease in 32,856 women. American Journal of Epidemiology, 119, 71–80.Google Scholar
  24. Henss, R. (1995). Waist-to-hip ratio and attractiveness: A replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 479–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hosegood, V., & Campbell, O. M. (2003). Body mass index, height, weight, arm circumference, and mortality in rural Bangladeshi women: A 19-y longitudinal study. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 77, 341–347.Google Scholar
  26. Islam, M. Z., Akhtaruzzaman, M., & Lamberg-Allardt, C. (2004). Nutritional status of women in Bangladesh: Comparison of energy intake and nutritional status of a low income rural group with a high income urban group. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 13, 61–68.Google Scholar
  27. Jasienska, G., Ziomkiewicz, A., Ellison, P. T., Lipson, S. F., & Thune, I. (2004). Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. Proceedings ofthe Royal Society ofLondon B, 271, 1213–1217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. King, J. C. (2003). The risk of maternal nutritional depletion and poor outcomes increases in early or closely spaced pregnancies. Journal of Nutrition, 135 (Suppl. 2), 1732–1736.Google Scholar
  29. Kramer, M. S., Coates, A. L., Michoud, M. C., Dağenais, S., Hamilton, E. F., & Papageorgiou, A. (1995). Maternal Anthropometry and Idiopathic Preterm Labor. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 86, 744–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kuh, D., & Schlomo, Y. B. (Eds.) (2004). A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology (2nd ed.). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Lahti-Koski, M., Pietinen, P., Männistö, S., & Vartiainen, E. (2000). Trends in waist-to-hip ratio and its determinants in adults in Finland from 1987 to 1997. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 72, 1436–1444.Google Scholar
  32. Lanska, D. J., Lanska, M. J., Hartz, A. J., & Rimm, A. A. (1985). Factors influencing anatomical location of fat tissue in 52,953 women. International journal of Obesity, 9, 29–38.Google Scholar
  33. Ley, C. J., Lees, B., & Stevenson, J. C. (1992). Sex-and menopause-associated change in body fat distribution. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 55, 950–954.Google Scholar
  34. Manson, J. E., Willet, W. C., Stampfer, M. J., Colditz, G. A., Hunter, D. J., Hankinson, S. E., et al. (1995). Body weight and mortality among women. New England Journal of Medicine, 333, 677–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marlowe, F., & Wetsman, A. (2001). Preferred waist-to-hip ratio and ecology Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 481–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marlowe, F., Apicella, C., & Reed, D. (2005). Men’s preferences for women’s profile waist-to-hip ratio in two societies. Evolution and Human behavior, 26, 458–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McGarvey, S. (1991). Obesity in Samoans and a perspective in its aetiology in Polynesians. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 53, 86–94.Google Scholar
  38. Misra, A., & Vikram, N. K. (2004). Insulin resistance syndrome (metabolic syndrome) and obesity in Asian Indians: Evidence and implications. Nutrition, 20, 482–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mohanty, C., Prasad, R., Reddy, A. S., Ghosh, J. K., Singh, T. B., & Das, B. K. (2006). Maternal anthropometry as predictors of low birth weight. Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, 52, 24–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nûnez-de la Mora, A., Chatterton, R. T., Choudhury, O., Napolitano, D., & Bentley, G. R. (in press — a). Childhood conditions determine adult progesterone levels. PLOS Medicine.Google Scholar
  41. Nûnez-de la Mora, A., Chatterton, R. T., Choudhury, O., Napolitano, D., & Bentley, G. R. (in press — b). The impact of developmental conditions on adult salivary estradiol levels: Why this differs from progesterone? American Journal of Human Biology.Google Scholar
  42. Pawlowski, B., & Grabarczyk, M. (2003). Center of body mass and the evolution of female body shape. American Journal of Biology, 15, 144–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pettijohn, T. F., & Jungeberg, B. J. (2004). Playboy Playmate curves: Changes in facial and body feature preferences across social and economic conditions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1186–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Powers, P. S. (1980). Obesity: The regulation of weight. Williams & Wilkins: Baltimore.Google Scholar
  45. Prentice, A. M. (2005). Early influences on human energy regulation: Thrifty genotypes and thrifty phenotypes. Physiology and behavior, 86, 640–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rhodes, G., Jeffery, L., Watson, T. L., Clifford, C. W. G., & Nakayama, K. (2003). Fitting the mind to the world: Face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects. Psychological Science, 14, 558–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shell-Duncan, B., & Yung, S. A. (2004). The maternal depletion transition in northern Kenya: The effects of settlement, development and disparity. Social Science and Medicine, 58, 2485–2498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Simmons, R. (2005). Developmental origins of adult metabolic disease: Concepts and controversies. Trends in Endocrinological Metabolism, 16, 390–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Singh, D. (1994). Body fat distribution and perception of desirable female body shape by young black men and women. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 16, 289–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Singh, D., & Luis, S. (1995). Ethnic and gender consensus for the role of waist-to-hip ratio on judgment of women’s attractiveness. Human Nature, 6, 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smith, K. L., Cornelissen, P. L., & Tovée, M. J. (2007). Color 3D bodies and judgements of human female attractiveness. Evolution and Human behavior, 28, 48–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sobal, J., & Stunkard, A. J. (1989). Socioeconomic status and obesity: A review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 260–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Steer, P. (2005). The epidemiology of preterm labor — a global perspective. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 33, 273–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sugiyama, L. S. (2004). Is beauty in the context-sensitive adaptations of the beholder? Shiwiar use of waist-to-hip ratio in assessments of female mate value. Evolution and Human behavior, 25, 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Swami, V., & Tovée, M. J. (2005). Female physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia: A cross-cultural study. Body Image, 2, 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Swami, V., & Tovée, M. J. (2006). Do judgements of food influence preferences for female body weight? British Journal of Psychology, 97, 353–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Tovée, M. J., & Cornelissen, P. L. (2001). Female and male perceptions of female physical attractiveness in front-view and profile. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 391–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tovée, M. J., Maisey, D. S., Emery, J. L., & Cornelissen, P. L. (1999). Visual cues to female physical attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 266, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tovée, M. J., Swami, V., Furnham, A., & Mangalparsad, R. (2006). Changing perceptions of attractiveness as observers are exposed to a different culture. Evolution and Human behavior, 27, 443–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tovée, M. J., Hancock, P., Mahmoodi, S., Singleton, B. R. R., & Cornelissen, P. L. (2002). Human female attractiveness: Waveform analysis of body shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 269, 2205–2213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tracer, D. P. (2002). Somatic versus reproductive energy allocation in Papua New Guinea: Life history theory and public health policy. American Journal of Human Biology, 14, 621–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vikram, N. K., Misra, A., Pandey, R. M., Dudeja, V., Sinha, S., Ramadevi, J., et al. (2003). Anthropometry and body composition in northern Asian Indian patients with type 2 diabetes: Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis of body mass index with percentage body fat as standard. Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolism, 16, 32–40.Google Scholar
  65. Vitzthum, V. J., Spielvogel, H., & Thornburg, J. (2004). Interpopulational differences in progesterone levels during conception and implantation in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 101, 1443–1448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vitzthum, V. J., Bentley, G. R., Spielvogel, H., Caceres, E., Thornburg, J., Jones, L., et al. (2002). Salivary progesterone levels and rate of ovulation are significantly lower in poorer than in better-off urban-dwelling Bolivian women. Human Reproduction, 17, 1906–1913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wass, P., Waldenstrom, U., Rossner, S., & Hellberg, D. (1997). An android body fat distribution in females impairs the pregnancy rate of in-vitro fertilisation-embryo transfer. Human Reproduction, 12, 2057–2060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wetsman, A., & Marlowe, F. (1999). How universal are preferences for female waist-to-hip ratios? Evidence from the Hadza of Tanzania. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 20, 219–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. World Bank Key Development Data and Statistics. (2005). Online publication at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/DATASTATISTICS/Resources/GNIPC.pdf.
  70. Yu, D. W., & Shepard, G. H. (1998). Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Nature, 396, 321–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zaadstra, B. M., Seidell, J. C., van Noord, P. A. H., te Velde, E. R., Habbema, J. D. F., Vrieswijk, B., et al. (1993). Fat and female fecundity: Prospective study of effect of body fat distribution on conception rates. British Medical Journal, 306, 484–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Isabel Scott, Gillian R. Bentley, Martin J. Tovée, Farid Uddin Ahamed, and Kesson Magid 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Isabel Scott
    • 1
  • Gillian R. Bentley
    • 2
  • Martin J. Tovée
    • 3
  • Farid Uddin Ahamed
    • 4
  • Kesson Magid
    • 5
  1. 1.Bristol UniversityUK
  2. 2.Durham UniversityUK
  3. 3.Experimental Psychology DepartmentCambridge UniversityUK
  4. 4.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of ChittagongBangladesh
  5. 5.Department of AnthropologyUniversity College LondonUK

Personalised recommendations