Critical Intellectuals and the Academic Labour Process

  • Frank Worthington
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter deals with some of the issues raised in other chapters in this book within the context of labour process theory (LPT) in organisation and management studies. For over three decades, particularly in the United Kingdom (Smith and Thompson 2001), LPT has become a growth area in management school teaching and research (Jaros 2001). The stated aim of those working in the labour process tradition in management education is to challenge the mainstream management view that the practice of management is a purely technical-rational actively designed to meet organisational complex goals. LPT contests this assumption by showing how the conditions under which labour is bought and sold in capitalist society are fundamentally exploitative (Knights and Willmott 1990).

Keywords

Academic Staff Labour Process Quality Audit League Table Quality Assurance Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackroyd, S. and Thompson, P. (1999) Organisational Misbehaviour, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Barker, J. (1999) The Discipline of Teamwork, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Braverman, H. (1974) Labour and Monopoly Capital, New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  4. Burawoy M. (1979) Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process under Monopoly Capitalism, London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Burawoy M. (1985) The Politics of Production, London, Verso.Google Scholar
  6. Casey, C. (1996) Self, Industrialization and Society, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Child, J. (2005) Organization, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Clegg, S. R. (1989) Frameworks of Power, London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Collinson, D. (1994) ‘Strategies of Resistance: Power, Knowledge and Subjectivity in the Workplace’, in J. Jermier, D. Knights and W. Nord (eds), Resistance and Power in Organizations, London: Routledge, 25–68.Google Scholar
  10. Collinson, D. (1992) Managing the Shopfloor: Subjectivity Masculinity and Workplace Culture, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Groot, J. (1997) ‘After the Ivory Tower: Gender, Commodification and the “Academic”’, Feminist Review, 55 (Spring): 130–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Delbridge, R. and Turnbull, P. (1992) ‘Human Resource Maximization — “The Management of Labour under a JIT System”’, in P. Blyton, and P. Turnbull (eds), Reassessing Human Resource Management, London: Sage, 56–73.Google Scholar
  13. Ezzamel, M. and Willmott, H. C. (1998) ‘Accounting for Team Work: Some Limits of Group-Based Systems of Organizational Control’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, June, 358–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ezzamel, M., Willmott, H. and Worthington, F. (2001) ‘Power, Control and Resistance in the Factory that Time Forgot’, Journal of Management Studies, December, 1053–1079.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish, London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  16. Harley, S. (2001) ‘Accountants Divided: Research Selectivity and Academic Accounting Labour in the UK’, Working Paper, De Montfort University Business School.Google Scholar
  17. Howie, G. (2002) ‘A Reflection of Quality: Instrumental Reason, Quality Audits and Knowledge Economy’, Critical Quarterly, 44(4), 140–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jermier, J. Knights, D. and Nord, W. (1994) (eds), Resistance and Power in Organizations, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Jaros, S. (2002) ‘Labour Process Theory: A Commentary on the Debate’, International Studies in Management and Organisation, 30 (4), 25–29.Google Scholar
  20. Knights, D. and Willmott, H. (1999) Management Lives: Power, Identify and Work Organization, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Kunda, G. (1990) Manufacturing Culture, Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Macintyre, A. E. (1981) After Virtue, London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  23. Martinez, L. and MacKenzie, R. (1999) ‘Quality Management: A New Form of Control?’, in S. Corby and S. G. White (eds), Employee Relations in the Public Services, London and New York: Routledge, 188–219.Google Scholar
  24. Marx, K. 1867 (1976) Capital, Vol. 1, Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  25. McKinlay, A and Taylor, P. (1998) ‘Foucault and the Politics of Production’, in A. McKinlay and K. Starkey (eds), Foucault, Management and Organization Theory, London, Sage, 1–37.Google Scholar
  26. McKinlay, A and Starkey, K (1998) ‘Managing Foucault, Foucault, Management and Organization Theory’, in A. McKinlay and K. Starkey (eds), Foucault, Management and Organization Theory, London: Sage, 224–258.Google Scholar
  27. Miller, H. (1991) ‘Academics and their Labour Process’, in C. Smith, D. Knights and H. Willmott (eds), White-Collar Work: The Non-Manual Labour Process, London: Macmillan, 108–139.Google Scholar
  28. Morley, L. (2003) Quality and Power in Higher Education, Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Piercy, N. (2000) ‘Why it is Fundamentally Stupid for a Business School to Try to Improve its Research Assessment Exercise Score?’, European Journal of Marketing, 34 (1), 2–32.Google Scholar
  30. Power, M. (2001) The Auditing Society: Rituals of Verification, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Puxty, A. Sikka, P. and Willmott, H. (1994) ‘Systems of Surveillance and the Silencing of UK Academic Accounting Labour’, British Accounting Review, 26, 137–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sewell, G. and Wilkinson, B. (1992) ‘Someone to Watch Over Me: Surveillance, Discipline and the Just-in-Time Labour Process’, Sociology, 26(2), 271–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith, C. and Thompson, P. (1999) ‘Reevaluating the Labour Process’, in M. Wardell, L. Steiger and P. Meiksins (eds), Rethinking the Labour Process, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 205–233.Google Scholar
  34. Thompson, P. (1990) ‘Crawling from the Wreckage: The Labour Process and the Politics of Production’, in D. Knights and H. Willmott (eds), Labour Process Theory, London: Macmillan, 95–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Thompson, P. and McHugh, D. (1995) A Critical Introduction to Work Organizations, London: Macmillan Business.Google Scholar
  36. Tuckman, A. (1995) ‘Ideology, Quality and TQM’, in A. Wilkinson, and H. Willmott (eds), Making Quality Critical, London and New York: Routledge, 96–118.Google Scholar
  37. Willis, P. (1977) Learning to Labour, Farnborough: Saxon House.Google Scholar
  38. Willmott, H. (1995) ‘Managing the Academics: Commodification and Control in The Development of University Education in the UK’, Human Relations, 48 (9), 993–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wray-Bliss, E. (2005) ‘Abstract Ethics, Embodied Ethics: The Strange Marriage of Foucault and Positivism in Labour Process Theory’, in C. Grey and H. Willmott (eds), Critical Management Studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 83–417.Google Scholar
  40. Zuboff (1988) In The Age of the Smart Machine, Oxford: Heineman.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Frank Worthington 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank Worthington

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations