Introduction
Abstract
The field of international business (IB) has recently arrived at a point in its development where its search for knowledge has focused on significant, seminal themes able to drive the advancement of the field forward. This call has been heralded in the literature. For example, the Journal of International Business Studies has recently published a series of articles where leading scholars have pondered the future development of international business as a scholarly discipline (e.g., Buckley, 2002; Buckley and Ghauri, 2004; Peng, 2004; Shenkar, 2004). Buckley (2002) argued that the field of international business may have run out of steam. He noted that to advance the field scholars need to identify the key factors in the global economy to be explained and then search out a tractable means of explication within a coherent theoretical framework. Peng (2004), responding to Buckley, identified notable areas that can be addressed to drive the IB agenda forward.
Keywords
International Business Trade Liberalization International Business Study Firm Internationalization Supply Chain SystemPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Buckley, P.J. (2002), “Is the International Business Research Agenda Running Out of Steam?” Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (2): 365–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Buckley, P. J. and Ghauri, P. N. (2004), “Globalisation, Economic Geography and the Strategy of Multinational Enterprises,” Journal of International Business Studies, 35 (2): 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Huntington, S. (1996), “The West Unique, Not Universal,” Foreign Affairs, 75: 28–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Peng, M. W. (2004), “Identifying the Big Question in International Business Research,” Journal of International Business Studies, 35 (2): 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shenkar, O. (2004), “One More Time: International Business in a Global Economy,” Journal of International Business Studies, 35 (2): 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sullivan, D. (1998), “Cognitive Tendencies in International Business Research: Implications of a ‘Narrow Vision,’” Journal of International Business Studies, 29 (4): 837–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar