The Return of the Visible and Romantic Ekphrasis: Wordsworth in the Visual Art Culture of Romanticism

  • Peter Simonsen

Abstract

Wordsworth is often identified with a deep iconoclastic scepticism regarding sight and visual phenomena. In The Prelude, he refers to the eye as ‘The most despotic of our senses’ and recalls a time when it had ‘gained/Such strength in me as often held my mind/In absolute dominion’ (1805, XI, ll. 171–176). As he continues by saying that he would ‘Gladly’ ‘endeavour to unfold the means/Which Nature studiously employs to thwart/This tyranny’ (ll. 176–180), Wordsworth encourages the identification enabling W. J. T. Mitchell, for instance, to state that ‘the first lesson we give to students of romanticism is that, for Wordsworth… “imagination” is a power of consciousness that transcends mere visualization. We may even go on to note that pictures and vision frequently play a negative role in romantic poetic theory’.1 One reason among many why the eye is a touchy subject in Wordsworth is no doubt that from January 1805 and for the rest of his life he suffered from attacks of severe inflammation of the eyelids that made him hypersensitive to light and inhibited poetic composition.2 Yet, while his bad eyes thus put a strain on composition, they also undoubtedly caused Wordsworth to become increasingly aware and appreciative of the gift of seeing, and consequently contributed to the foregrounding of the visible and the turn to descriptive and ekphrastic writing in the later career: a turn that was coterminous with what Alan Liu calls the later Wordsworth’s ‘effort to criticize the flight of imagination’ resulting in predominantly ‘disimaginative work’ that revises the early visual scepticism which informs much of the Great Decade poetry.3

Keywords

Graphic Illustration Lake District Romantic Period Visual Medium Visual Phenomenon 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    See Edith C. Batho, The Later Wordsworth (New York: Russell and Russell, 1963, 1st ed. 1933), pp. 318–319.Google Scholar
  2. 13.
    M. H. Abrams, The Mirror and the Lamp: Romantic Theory and the Critical Tradition ( London, Oxford, New York: Oxford UP, 1953 ), p. 50.Google Scholar
  3. 14.
    R. A. Foakes, ed., Lectures 1808–1819 On Literature, 2 vols (Princeton: Princeton UP, 1987), 2, p. 447.Google Scholar
  4. 19.
    Quoted in Jonathan Bate, Romantic Ecology: Wordsworth and the Environmental Tradition ( London and New York: Routledge, 1991 ), p. 42.Google Scholar
  5. 20.
    Beth Darlington, ed., The Love Letters of William and Mary Wordsworth ( London: Chatto & Windus, 1982 ), p. 42.Google Scholar
  6. 21.
    Stephen Gill, William Wordsworth: A Life ( Oxford and New York: Oxford UP, 1989 ), p. 285.Google Scholar
  7. 25.
    Martin Meisel, Realizations: Narrative, Pictorial, and Theatrical Arts in Nineteenth-Century England ( Princeton: Princeton UP, 1983 ), p. 31.Google Scholar
  8. 26.
    Marilyn Gaull, English Romanticism: The Human Context ( New York and London: Norton, 1988 ), p. 335.Google Scholar
  9. 27.
    Charles Lamb, The Complete Works and Letters ( New York: The Modern Library, 1935 ), p. 1019.Google Scholar
  10. 34.
    Harold Bloom, ‘The Visionary Cinema of Romantic Poetry’, in William Blake: Essays for S. Foster Damon, ed. Alvin H. Rosenfeld ( Providence: Brown UP, 1969 ), p. 20.Google Scholar
  11. 35.
    Quoted in William Knight, The Life of William Wordsworth, 3 vols (Edinburgh: William Paterson, 1889), 3, p. 296.Google Scholar
  12. 36.
    Derek Hudson, ed., The Diary of Henry Crabb Robinson. An Abridgement ( London: Oxford UP, 1967 ), p. 66.Google Scholar
  13. 38.
    See Edward Miller, That Noble Cabinet: A History of the British Museum ( London: André Deutsch, 1973 ), p. 199.Google Scholar
  14. 39.
    David M. Wilson, The British Museum: A History (London: The British Museum P, 2002), pp. 74–75. The problematic nature of these transactions is described in Miller, Noble Cabinet, pp. 198–202.Google Scholar
  15. 53.
    A. W. Phinney, ‘Keats in the Museum: Between Aesthetics and History’, Journal of English and Germanic Philology 90 (1991), pp. 217–218.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Peter Simonsen 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Simonsen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations