Angels, Soul and Rebirth

  • Alison Oddey

Abstract

Luce Irigaray has criticised Western culture for forgetting the existence of the Goddess, woman and nature. She discusses ‘the capacity for withdrawing from a universe which does not correspond to oneself, for taking time to experience what or who one is, for inventing ways of expressing oneself, for acting according to one’s own values, and also for entering into relation with the other, respecting both oneself and this other’.1 Warner’s Angel Project in Perth, Australia invites the spectator to take as much time as she/he wishes to experience the self and in relation to a twenty-first century world of globalisation, the Internet and developing technologies. I want to argue, that in Warner’s re-framing of the theatrical in the crossover of art installation and performance, and in the form of the walk, the thirteen sited buildings and the everyday city space, that the spectator is given the chance to spiritually become, to self-compose a poetics, emerging and transforming to the spectator-performer-protagonist of the work.

Keywords

Water Lily Filing Cabinet Sacred Space Paradise Lost White Wing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    L. Irigaray, Key Writings (New York: Continuum, 2004), p. ix.Google Scholar
  2. 6.
    A. Kuhn, ‘A Journey Through Memory’, in S. Radstone (ed.), Memory and Methodology (Oxford & New York: Berg, 2000), p. 184.Google Scholar
  3. 7.
    R. Adams, Why People Photograph (New York: Aperture, 1994), p. 181.Google Scholar
  4. 8.
    J. Drobnick, ‘Volatile Effects Olfactory Dimensions of Art and Architecture’ in D. Howes (ed.), Empire of the Senses (Oxford & New York: Berg, 2005), p. 272.Google Scholar
  5. 23.
    G. Bachelard, The Poetics of Space (Boston: Beacon Press, 1969), pp. 183–5.Google Scholar
  6. 26.
    M. de Certeau, The Practice of Everyday Life, translated by S. Rendall (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press 1984), p. 99.Google Scholar
  7. 28.
    U. Chaudhuri, ‘Land/Scape/Theory’ in Land/Scape/Theater and the new spatial paradigm, E. Fuchs and U. Chaudhuri, (Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2002), p. 13.Google Scholar
  8. 34.
    B. Bender, ‘Introduction:Landscape — Meaning and Action’, in B. Bender (ed.), Landscape: Politics and Perspectives (Oxford: Berg, 1993), p. 1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Alison Oddey 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alison Oddey

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations