Advertisement

‘Accidentalizing’ a Nationalist Conflict: The Spy Plane Collision Incident (April 2001)

  • Simon Shen

Abstract

On 1 April 2001, almost two years after the Bombing, an American EP-3 reconnaissance plane (conveniently referred to as a ‘spy plane’) and a Chinese F-8 war plane collided over the South China Sea. The Chinese plane was destroyed and its pilot, Wang Wei, went missing; the American plane was forced to land at Hainan Airport. The body of the pilot was never found. This incident in many ways resembled the Bombing, but whether the exact spot where the aerial incident occurred belonged to China or was in international territory was open to dispute. Unlike the Bombing, which was treated by China as a ‘non-accident’, the Collision was defined by the party-state as an accident. The ‘accidentalization’ constitutes the setting for the second case study and points to the different outcome in this case.

Keywords

Chinese People Premature Ejaculation Crew Member Ordinary Citizen Bush Administration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Gries, Peter and Peng, Kaiping. ‘Cultural Clash? Apologies East and West’. Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 11, No. 30, 2002, p. 176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 4.
    Lampton, David. Same Bed, Different Dreams: Managing US China Relations, 1989–2000 (2003 Chinese Version). Trans. Ji Qiufeng. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press, 2003, p. 453.Google Scholar
  3. 6.
    Kagan, Robert and Kristol, William. ‘A National Humiliation’. Weekly Standard, Vol. 6, No. 30, 16–23 April 2001.Google Scholar
  4. 14.
    Liu, Lian. ‘Zhongnanhai Qinzi Chuli Zhuangji Shijian (Zhongnanhai Handled the Collision Incident Personally)’. Jinbao Yuekan (Mirror Monthly), No. 286, May 2001, p. 87.Google Scholar
  5. 14.
    Xia, Wensi. ‘Jiang Zemin Buxiang Yu Bushi Duikang (Jiang Zemin Does Not Want to Confront Bush)’. Kai fang Zazhi (Open Magazine), No. 173, May 2001, pp. 10–11.Google Scholar
  6. 17.
    Li, Qin. ‘A Look at the Plane Collision Incident from the Perspective of International Law’. PDO, 16 April 2001.Google Scholar
  7. 19.
    Foot, Rosemary. Rights Beyond Borders: The Global Community and the Struggle over Human Rights in China. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 31.
    Zhang, Hang. ‘Culture and Apology: The Hainan Island Incident’. World Englishes, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2001, p. 390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 44.
    Lam, Willy Wo-Lap. ‘Analysis: Behind the Scenes in Beijing’s Corridors of Powers’. CNN, 9 May 2001.Google Scholar
  10. 45.
    Pomfret, John. ‘New Nationalism Drives Beijing: Hard Line Reflects Popular Mood’. Washington Post, 4 April 2001.Google Scholar
  11. 46.
    Shambaugh, David. ‘Containment or Engagement of China? Calculating Beijing’s Responses’. International Security, Vol. 21, No. 2, Fall 1996, p. 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 55.
    Luo, Bing. ‘Junfang Ju Biaotai Zhichi Jiang Zemin (The Military Refuses to Come Out and Support Jiang Zemin)’. Zhengming, No. 173, May 2001, pp. 10–11.Google Scholar
  13. 56.
    Lampton, David. Same Bed (2003) pp. 453–4. [2] Mulvenon, James. ‘Civil-Military Relations and the EP-3 Crisis’. China Leadership Monitor Vol. 1, No. 1, September 2001 [www.chinaleadershipmonitor.org/20011/CLM20011JM1.pdf].Google Scholar
  14. 69.
    Sutter, Robert. ‘China’s Good Neighbour Policy and its Implications for Taiwan’. Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 13, No. 41, November 2004, pp. 722–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 70.
    Keefe, John. Anatomy of the EP-3 Incident. Alexandria, VA: Centre for Naval Analysis, 2002.Google Scholar
  16. 74.
    Odeen, Philip A. ‘The Role of the National Security Council’. In Inderfuth, Karl and Johnson, Loch (eds). Decisions of the Highest Order: Perspectives on the National Security Council. California: Brooks/Cole, 1988, pp. 340–5.Google Scholar
  17. 76.
    Luo, Cheng. ‘Cong Falijiaodu He Zhengzhi Jiaodu Kan Zhongmei Zhuangji Shijian (A Look at the Plane Collision Incident from the Perspective of Law and Politics)’. Guoji Guanxi Xueyuan Xuebao, October 2001, pp. 14–17. [2] Yang, Zhichu, ‘Zhuangji Shijian Yu Guojifa (The Plane Collision Incident and International Law)’. In Le, Shan (ed), p. 72.Google Scholar
  18. 80.
    Shi, Hanbing. ‘Jinan Wang Wei Jun (In Memorial of Mr. Wang Wei)’. PSDF, No. 16, 13 April 2001.Google Scholar
  19. 81.
    Shi, Hanbing. ‘Meiguo Weige Yu Zhongguo De Zaoxie (The US Vagina and the Chinese Premature Ejaculation)’. PSDF, No. 18, 1 June 2001. The sequence of the four points has been rearranged by the author for editorial purpose.Google Scholar
  20. 84.
    Ye, Fu. ‘Cong Zhuangji Shijian Kan Zhongguo Zhengfu (A Look at the Chinese Government from the Perspective of the Plane Collision Incident)’. Boxun Xinwen Wangluo (Boxun News Network) 16 April 2001: [www.boxun.com/hero/yefu/6_1.shtml].Google Scholar
  21. 85.
    Han, Deqiang, ‘Wang Wei Yu Zhonghua Minzu Tongzai (Wang Wei will Always be Alive with the Chinese Ethnicity)’. PSDF, No. 18, 8 April 2001.Google Scholar
  22. 86.
    Shi, Hanbing, ‘Zhangji Zhangchu De Waijiao Juexian He Waijiao Jiyu (Diplomatic Deficiencies and Opportunities as Revealed from the Collision)’. PSDF, No. 18, 8 April 2001.Google Scholar
  23. 90.
    Qin, Xudong. ‘Cong Guojifa Kan Zhongmei Zhuangji Shijian (A Look at the Sino-American Plane Collision Incident from the Perspective of International Law)’. Falu Tushuguan (Law Library Online) 3 November 2003: [www.lawlib.com/lw/lw_view.asp?no=22121].Google Scholar
  24. 95.
    Rice, Condoleezza. ‘Promoting the National Interest’. Foreign Affairs, Vol. 79, No. 1, January-February 2000, p. 56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 97.
    Jin, Junhui. ‘Bushi Zhengfu Duihua Zhengce Fangzheng Ji Qi Zouxiang (Bush Administration’s China Policy and its Prospects)’. CIR, June 2001, pp. 14–15.Google Scholar
  26. 98.
    Yang, Jiemian. ‘Dui Xiaobushi Zhengfu Duihua Zhengce De Fengxi he Sikao (An Analysis of the China Policy of George W. Bush)’. GuojiWentiYanjiu (International Issues Study), May 2001, pp. 41–6.Google Scholar
  27. 103.
    Lu, Jiaping. ‘Zhongmei Zhuanji Shijian: Shijie Xinlengzhan Shiqi De Shifadian (The Sino-American Airplane Collision Incident: The Start of a New Cold War)’. PSDF, 11 April 2001.Google Scholar
  28. 109.
    Shi, Xin. ‘Gong Meiguo Duihua Zhengce Tiaozheng Kan Zhongmei Guanxi Zhong Cunza De Wenti (A Look at the Problem in Sino-American Relations from the Recent Adjustment of US’s China Policy)’. Guoji Guanxi Xueyuan Xuebao, October 2001, p. 17.Google Scholar
  29. 111.
    Fang, Ning, ‘Zhongguo Zhongyi Shuobu Le (China Eventually Said No)’. PSDF, No. 18, 1 June 2001.Google Scholar
  30. 113.
    Jia, Qingguo. ‘Learning to Live with the Hegemon: Evolution of China’s Policy toward the US since the End of the Cold War’. Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 14, No. 44, August 2005, p. 402.Google Scholar
  31. 114.
    Liu, Xiaobo. ‘Taoguangyanghui: Yizhong Xialiu De Waijiao Zhihui (Taoguang Yanghui: A Dirty Diplomatic Wisdom)’. Liu Xiaobo Wenxuan (Selected Works o fLiu Xiaobo) 21 July 2001 [www.boxun.com/hero/liuxb/14_1.shtml].Google Scholar
  32. 118.
    Han, Deqiang. ‘Luging Wo Lingkong, Zhuanghui Wo Zhanji, Suijing Waijiao Shi Neiying (Appeasement Policy is the Planted Agent of the US Air Invasion)’. PSDF No. 18, 4 April 2001. [2] Han, Deqiang. ‘Wang Wei Yu Zhonghua Minzu Tongzai’.Google Scholar
  33. 121.
    Ling, Xu. ‘Yao Cong Gengbendian Yanpan Zhongmei Guanxi (An Analysis of US-China Relations)’. CIR, June 2001, pp. 10–12.Google Scholar
  34. 122.
    Zheng, Yongnian. Daguo De Zeren: Zhuanxing Zhong De Zhongguo Guoji Zhanlue (Responsibility of a Big Nation: International Strategy of China in Transition). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 2004, pp. 134–68.Google Scholar
  35. 125.
    Huang, Yan. ‘Zhongmei Zhuanji Shijian Fangxi: Lian Aisenghaoweoer Dou Daoqian, Weishema Bushi Xue Zuobudaone? (An Analysis of the Airplane Collision Incident: Even Eisenhower Can Apologize, Why Can’t Bush?)’. SCDFA, 9 April 2001.Google Scholar
  36. 127.
    Daishu Yeyu Aiguo Renshi. ‘Cong Very Sorry Kan Meiguo Guizi De Jiaohua (A Look at Americans’ Cunning from the Word “Very Sorry”)’. SCDFA, 12 April 2001.Google Scholar
  37. 129.
    Tangta. ‘Wo Zhichi Zhongguo Zhengfu Shifang Feixingyuan (I Support the Chinese Government’s Release of American Pilots)’. SCDFA, 12 April 2001.Google Scholar
  38. 131.
    Aying. Zhongmei Wangluo Zhanzheng De Yiyi (The Significance of the Sino-American Internet War). SCDFA 3 May 2001.Google Scholar
  39. 134.
    Vatis, Michael. ‘Cyber Terrorism and Information Warfare: Government Perspectives’. In Alexander, Yonah and Swetnam, Michael (eds). Cyber Terrorism and Information Warfare. New York: Transnational Publishers, 2001.Google Scholar
  40. 137.
    Liu, Taiping. Daojihua: Erlinlinba Nian Zhonggong Fadong Duitai Gehou Zhan (Plan Island: PRC Will Launch Imminent War Against Taiwan). Taibei: Shiying Publishing, 2005.Google Scholar
  41. 139.
    Xiaotian Chaolong. ‘Wangwei, Nizana? (Wang Wei, Where are you?)’. SCDFA, 10 April 2001.Google Scholar
  42. 142.
    Rosenthal, Elisabeth. ‘News Analysis: Many Voices for Beijing’. New York Times, 10 April 2001.Google Scholar
  43. 144.
    Yedi Xifeng. ‘Xuezha Yao Yong Xue Lai Huang (Return Blood Debts with Blood)’. SCDFA, 10 April 2001.Google Scholar
  44. 145.
    Dijiu Cunmin Wongluoke. ‘Meiguo Zhengfu Zai Jiechi Renzhi!!(The US Government is Taking Hostages!!)’. SCDFA, 9 April 2001.Google Scholar
  45. 147.
    Qijie Jiayijie Dengyu Bajie. ‘Meiguo Zhezhong Zhanliu Diushou Buhui Gei Women Shijian Qiangda Da Yuzhi Duikang (America Will Not Allow Us to be Strong Enough to Confront Them)’. SCDFA, 13 April 2001.Google Scholar
  46. 158.
    Zhen, Duo. ‘Duikang Meiguo Jiutiao Ce (Nine Ways to Confront America)’. SCDFA, 9 April 2001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Simon Shen 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simon Shen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations